Cargando…

A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK

AIMS: To determine the impact of self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) strip use in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK. METHODS: The study period was April 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005. Data from primary care was extracted from The Health Improvement Network database. Patients identified with diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, C. L., Griffin, A., Chamberlain, G. H., Turkiendorf, A., McEwan, P., Evans, L. M., Owens, D. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare Communications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22127668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0001-9
_version_ 1782206447710371840
author Morgan, C. L.
Griffin, A.
Chamberlain, G. H.
Turkiendorf, A.
McEwan, P.
Evans, L. M.
Owens, D. R.
author_facet Morgan, C. L.
Griffin, A.
Chamberlain, G. H.
Turkiendorf, A.
McEwan, P.
Evans, L. M.
Owens, D. R.
author_sort Morgan, C. L.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To determine the impact of self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) strip use in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK. METHODS: The study period was April 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005. Data from primary care was extracted from The Health Improvement Network database. Patients identified with diabetes and matching the inclusion criteria were defined as new users of SMBG, prevalent users, or non-users. Patients were also defined as treated with insulin, with oral agents (OA), or not pharmacologically treated. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) at baseline and after 12 months was compared. RESULTS: 2559 patients met the inclusion criteria. For new users, HbA(1c) fell by 0.59% (P=0.399) for those treated with insulin, 1.52% (P<0.001) for those treated with OA, and 0.51% (P<0.001) for no treatment. In prevalent users, changes were 0.31% (P<0.001), 0.34% (P<0.001), and 0.09% (P=0.456), respectively. In non-users, changes were 0.28% (P=0.618), 0.42% (P<0.001), and an increase of 0.05% (P=0.043), respectively. A significant decrease in mean HbA(1c) was associated with increasing strip use in OA patients newly initiated on strips. CONCLUSION: This observational study showed a significant decrease in HbA(1c) for new users of SMBG treated either non-pharmacologically or with OA, and for prevalent users treated with insulin or OA. Reduced HbA(1c) with increasing strip use was observed but was only significant for OA-treated new users. This suggests that SMBG use has a role in the treatment of non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3118273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Healthcare Communications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31182732011-07-14 A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK Morgan, C. L. Griffin, A. Chamberlain, G. H. Turkiendorf, A. McEwan, P. Evans, L. M. Owens, D. R. Diabetes Ther Original Research AIMS: To determine the impact of self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) strip use in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK. METHODS: The study period was April 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005. Data from primary care was extracted from The Health Improvement Network database. Patients identified with diabetes and matching the inclusion criteria were defined as new users of SMBG, prevalent users, or non-users. Patients were also defined as treated with insulin, with oral agents (OA), or not pharmacologically treated. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) at baseline and after 12 months was compared. RESULTS: 2559 patients met the inclusion criteria. For new users, HbA(1c) fell by 0.59% (P=0.399) for those treated with insulin, 1.52% (P<0.001) for those treated with OA, and 0.51% (P<0.001) for no treatment. In prevalent users, changes were 0.31% (P<0.001), 0.34% (P<0.001), and 0.09% (P=0.456), respectively. In non-users, changes were 0.28% (P=0.618), 0.42% (P<0.001), and an increase of 0.05% (P=0.043), respectively. A significant decrease in mean HbA(1c) was associated with increasing strip use in OA patients newly initiated on strips. CONCLUSION: This observational study showed a significant decrease in HbA(1c) for new users of SMBG treated either non-pharmacologically or with OA, and for prevalent users treated with insulin or OA. Reduced HbA(1c) with increasing strip use was observed but was only significant for OA-treated new users. This suggests that SMBG use has a role in the treatment of non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Springer Healthcare Communications 2010-07-28 2010-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3118273/ /pubmed/22127668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0001-9 Text en © Springer Healthcare 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Morgan, C. L.
Griffin, A.
Chamberlain, G. H.
Turkiendorf, A.
McEwan, P.
Evans, L. M.
Owens, D. R.
A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
title A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
title_full A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
title_fullStr A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
title_full_unstemmed A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
title_short A longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the UK
title_sort longitudinal study into the new and long-term use of self-monitoring blood glucose strips in the uk
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22127668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0001-9
work_keys_str_mv AT morgancl alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT griffina alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT chamberlaingh alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT turkiendorfa alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT mcewanp alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT evanslm alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT owensdr alongitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT morgancl longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT griffina longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT chamberlaingh longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT turkiendorfa longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT mcewanp longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT evanslm longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk
AT owensdr longitudinalstudyintothenewandlongtermuseofselfmonitoringbloodglucosestripsintheuk