Cargando…

Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Active travel such as walking and cycling has potential to increase physical activity levels in sedentary individuals. Motorised car travel is a sedentary behaviour that contributes to carbon emissions. There have been recent calls for technology that will improve our ability to measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Paul, Doherty, Aiden, Berry, Emma, Hodges, Steve, Batterham, Alan M, Foster, Charlie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21599935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-44
_version_ 1782206453371633664
author Kelly, Paul
Doherty, Aiden
Berry, Emma
Hodges, Steve
Batterham, Alan M
Foster, Charlie
author_facet Kelly, Paul
Doherty, Aiden
Berry, Emma
Hodges, Steve
Batterham, Alan M
Foster, Charlie
author_sort Kelly, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Active travel such as walking and cycling has potential to increase physical activity levels in sedentary individuals. Motorised car travel is a sedentary behaviour that contributes to carbon emissions. There have been recent calls for technology that will improve our ability to measure these travel behaviours, and in particular evaluate modes and volumes of active versus sedentary travel. The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the potential efficacy of a new electronic measurement device, a wearable digital camera called SenseCam, in travel research. METHODS: Participants (n = 20) were required to wear the SenseCam device for one full day of travel. The device automatically records approximately 3,600 time-stamped, first-person point-of-view images per day, without any action required by the wearer. Participants also completed a self-report travel diary over the same period for comparison, and were interviewed afterwards to assess user burden and experience. RESULTS: There were a total of 105 confirmed journeys in this pilot. The new SenseCam device recorded more journeys than the travel diary (99 vs. 94). Although the two measures demonstrated an acceptable correlation for journey duration (r = 0.92, p < 0.001) self-reported journey duration was over-reported (mean difference 154 s per journey; 95% CI = 89 to 218 s; 95% limits of agreement = 154 ± 598 s (-444 to 752 s)). The device also provided visual data that was used for directed interviews about sources of error. CONCLUSIONS: Direct observation of travel behaviour from time-stamped images shows considerable potential in the field of travel research. Journey duration derived from direct observation of travel behaviour from time-stamped images appears to suggest over-reporting of self-reported journey duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3118309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31183092011-06-20 Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study Kelly, Paul Doherty, Aiden Berry, Emma Hodges, Steve Batterham, Alan M Foster, Charlie Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Active travel such as walking and cycling has potential to increase physical activity levels in sedentary individuals. Motorised car travel is a sedentary behaviour that contributes to carbon emissions. There have been recent calls for technology that will improve our ability to measure these travel behaviours, and in particular evaluate modes and volumes of active versus sedentary travel. The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the potential efficacy of a new electronic measurement device, a wearable digital camera called SenseCam, in travel research. METHODS: Participants (n = 20) were required to wear the SenseCam device for one full day of travel. The device automatically records approximately 3,600 time-stamped, first-person point-of-view images per day, without any action required by the wearer. Participants also completed a self-report travel diary over the same period for comparison, and were interviewed afterwards to assess user burden and experience. RESULTS: There were a total of 105 confirmed journeys in this pilot. The new SenseCam device recorded more journeys than the travel diary (99 vs. 94). Although the two measures demonstrated an acceptable correlation for journey duration (r = 0.92, p < 0.001) self-reported journey duration was over-reported (mean difference 154 s per journey; 95% CI = 89 to 218 s; 95% limits of agreement = 154 ± 598 s (-444 to 752 s)). The device also provided visual data that was used for directed interviews about sources of error. CONCLUSIONS: Direct observation of travel behaviour from time-stamped images shows considerable potential in the field of travel research. Journey duration derived from direct observation of travel behaviour from time-stamped images appears to suggest over-reporting of self-reported journey duration. BioMed Central 2011-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3118309/ /pubmed/21599935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-44 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kelly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kelly, Paul
Doherty, Aiden
Berry, Emma
Hodges, Steve
Batterham, Alan M
Foster, Charlie
Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
title Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
title_full Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
title_fullStr Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
title_short Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
title_sort can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? results from a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21599935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-44
work_keys_str_mv AT kellypaul canweusedigitallifelogimagestoinvestigateactiveandsedentarytravelbehaviourresultsfromapilotstudy
AT dohertyaiden canweusedigitallifelogimagestoinvestigateactiveandsedentarytravelbehaviourresultsfromapilotstudy
AT berryemma canweusedigitallifelogimagestoinvestigateactiveandsedentarytravelbehaviourresultsfromapilotstudy
AT hodgessteve canweusedigitallifelogimagestoinvestigateactiveandsedentarytravelbehaviourresultsfromapilotstudy
AT batterhamalanm canweusedigitallifelogimagestoinvestigateactiveandsedentarytravelbehaviourresultsfromapilotstudy
AT fostercharlie canweusedigitallifelogimagestoinvestigateactiveandsedentarytravelbehaviourresultsfromapilotstudy