Cargando…

Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality

Geographic and temporal variation in occurrence of dementia within the US has received little attention despite its importance for generation of new etiologic hypotheses and health services research. We examine methodological problems in the use of vital statistics data for assessing variation over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillum, Richard F., Yorrick, Ralston, Obisesan, Thomas O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21695038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8041244
_version_ 1782206518561603584
author Gillum, Richard F.
Yorrick, Ralston
Obisesan, Thomas O.
author_facet Gillum, Richard F.
Yorrick, Ralston
Obisesan, Thomas O.
author_sort Gillum, Richard F.
collection PubMed
description Geographic and temporal variation in occurrence of dementia within the US has received little attention despite its importance for generation of new etiologic hypotheses and health services research. We examine methodological problems in the use of vital statistics data for assessing variation over time, among states and within states in the US. We analyzed the US multiple cause of death files for 2005–2006 and 1999–2000 US deaths with Alzheimer’s Disease (International Classification of Disease 10th revision code G30) and other dementias (codes F01, F02, R54) coded as underlying or contributing cause of death based on the death certificate. Age-adjusted death rates were computed by year, state or county for persons aged 65 years and over. In 2005–2006 combined, 555,904 total deaths occurred with any dementia type (212,386 for Alzheimer’s disease) coded as underlying or contributing cause. Among the states, age-adjusted rates per 100,000 per year varied by two fold ranging from 458 in New York to 921 in Oregon. Similar geographic patterns were seen for Alzheimer’s disease. However, between 1999–2000 and 2005–2006 the US death rate for all dementia increased only from 559 to 695 (24%) while that for Alzheimer’s disease doubled from 135 to 266. Use of specific (G30, F01) versus non-specific diagnoses (F02, R54) varied among states and over time, explaining most of the temporal increase in rate of Alzheimer’s disease. Further research is needed to assess artifacts of diagnosis, certification or coding, utilization of health services, versus biological variation as possible causes of temporal and geographic variation to enhance utility of mortality data for dementia monitoring and research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3118887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31188872011-06-21 Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality Gillum, Richard F. Yorrick, Ralston Obisesan, Thomas O. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Geographic and temporal variation in occurrence of dementia within the US has received little attention despite its importance for generation of new etiologic hypotheses and health services research. We examine methodological problems in the use of vital statistics data for assessing variation over time, among states and within states in the US. We analyzed the US multiple cause of death files for 2005–2006 and 1999–2000 US deaths with Alzheimer’s Disease (International Classification of Disease 10th revision code G30) and other dementias (codes F01, F02, R54) coded as underlying or contributing cause of death based on the death certificate. Age-adjusted death rates were computed by year, state or county for persons aged 65 years and over. In 2005–2006 combined, 555,904 total deaths occurred with any dementia type (212,386 for Alzheimer’s disease) coded as underlying or contributing cause. Among the states, age-adjusted rates per 100,000 per year varied by two fold ranging from 458 in New York to 921 in Oregon. Similar geographic patterns were seen for Alzheimer’s disease. However, between 1999–2000 and 2005–2006 the US death rate for all dementia increased only from 559 to 695 (24%) while that for Alzheimer’s disease doubled from 135 to 266. Use of specific (G30, F01) versus non-specific diagnoses (F02, R54) varied among states and over time, explaining most of the temporal increase in rate of Alzheimer’s disease. Further research is needed to assess artifacts of diagnosis, certification or coding, utilization of health services, versus biological variation as possible causes of temporal and geographic variation to enhance utility of mortality data for dementia monitoring and research. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011-04 2011-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3118887/ /pubmed/21695038 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8041244 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gillum, Richard F.
Yorrick, Ralston
Obisesan, Thomas O.
Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality
title Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality
title_full Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality
title_fullStr Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality
title_full_unstemmed Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality
title_short Population Surveillance of Dementia Mortality
title_sort population surveillance of dementia mortality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21695038
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8041244
work_keys_str_mv AT gillumrichardf populationsurveillanceofdementiamortality
AT yorrickralston populationsurveillanceofdementiamortality
AT obisesanthomaso populationsurveillanceofdementiamortality