Cargando…

Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Patients at higher than average risk of heritable cancer may process risk information differently than the general population. However, little is known about clinical, demographic, or psychosocial predictors that may impact risk perception in these groups. The objective of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tilburt, Jon C, James, Katherine M, Sinicrope, Pamela S, Eton, David T, Costello, Brian A, Carey, Jantey, Lane, Melanie A, Ehlers, Shawna L, Erwin, Patricia J, Nowakowski, Katherine E, Murad, Mohammad H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21595959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-9-2
_version_ 1782206526898831360
author Tilburt, Jon C
James, Katherine M
Sinicrope, Pamela S
Eton, David T
Costello, Brian A
Carey, Jantey
Lane, Melanie A
Ehlers, Shawna L
Erwin, Patricia J
Nowakowski, Katherine E
Murad, Mohammad H
author_facet Tilburt, Jon C
James, Katherine M
Sinicrope, Pamela S
Eton, David T
Costello, Brian A
Carey, Jantey
Lane, Melanie A
Ehlers, Shawna L
Erwin, Patricia J
Nowakowski, Katherine E
Murad, Mohammad H
author_sort Tilburt, Jon C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients at higher than average risk of heritable cancer may process risk information differently than the general population. However, little is known about clinical, demographic, or psychosocial predictors that may impact risk perception in these groups. The objective of this study was to characterize factors associated with perceived risk of developing cancer in groups at high risk for cancer based on genetics or family history. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycInfo, and Scopus from inception through April 2009 for English-language, original investigations in humans using core concepts of "risk" and "cancer." We abstracted key information and then further restricted articles dealing with perceived risk of developing cancer due to inherited risk. RESULTS: Of 1028 titles identified, 53 articles met our criteria. Most (92%) used an observational design and focused on women (70%) with a family history of or contemplating genetic testing for breast cancer. Of the 53 studies, 36 focused on patients who had not had genetic testing for cancer risk, 17 included studies of patients who had undergone genetic testing for cancer risk. Family history of cancer, previous prophylactic tests and treatments, and younger age were associated with cancer risk perception. In addition, beliefs about the preventability and severity of cancer, personality factors such as "monitoring" personality, the ability to process numerical information, as well as distress/worry also were associated with cancer risk perception. Few studies addressed non-breast cancer or risk perception in specific demographic groups (e.g. elderly or minority groups) and few employed theory-driven analytic strategies to decipher interrelationships of factors. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors influence cancer risk perception in patients at elevated risk for cancer. The science of characterizing and improving risk perception in cancer for high risk groups, although evolving, is still relatively undeveloped in several key topic areas including cancers other than breast and in specific populations. Future rigorous risk perception research using experimental designs and focused on cancers other than breast would advance the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3118965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31189652011-06-22 Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review Tilburt, Jon C James, Katherine M Sinicrope, Pamela S Eton, David T Costello, Brian A Carey, Jantey Lane, Melanie A Ehlers, Shawna L Erwin, Patricia J Nowakowski, Katherine E Murad, Mohammad H Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Patients at higher than average risk of heritable cancer may process risk information differently than the general population. However, little is known about clinical, demographic, or psychosocial predictors that may impact risk perception in these groups. The objective of this study was to characterize factors associated with perceived risk of developing cancer in groups at high risk for cancer based on genetics or family history. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycInfo, and Scopus from inception through April 2009 for English-language, original investigations in humans using core concepts of "risk" and "cancer." We abstracted key information and then further restricted articles dealing with perceived risk of developing cancer due to inherited risk. RESULTS: Of 1028 titles identified, 53 articles met our criteria. Most (92%) used an observational design and focused on women (70%) with a family history of or contemplating genetic testing for breast cancer. Of the 53 studies, 36 focused on patients who had not had genetic testing for cancer risk, 17 included studies of patients who had undergone genetic testing for cancer risk. Family history of cancer, previous prophylactic tests and treatments, and younger age were associated with cancer risk perception. In addition, beliefs about the preventability and severity of cancer, personality factors such as "monitoring" personality, the ability to process numerical information, as well as distress/worry also were associated with cancer risk perception. Few studies addressed non-breast cancer or risk perception in specific demographic groups (e.g. elderly or minority groups) and few employed theory-driven analytic strategies to decipher interrelationships of factors. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors influence cancer risk perception in patients at elevated risk for cancer. The science of characterizing and improving risk perception in cancer for high risk groups, although evolving, is still relatively undeveloped in several key topic areas including cancers other than breast and in specific populations. Future rigorous risk perception research using experimental designs and focused on cancers other than breast would advance the field. BioMed Central 2011-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3118965/ /pubmed/21595959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-9-2 Text en Copyright ©2011 Tilburt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tilburt, Jon C
James, Katherine M
Sinicrope, Pamela S
Eton, David T
Costello, Brian A
Carey, Jantey
Lane, Melanie A
Ehlers, Shawna L
Erwin, Patricia J
Nowakowski, Katherine E
Murad, Mohammad H
Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
title Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
title_full Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
title_short Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
title_sort factors influencing cancer risk perception in high risk populations: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21595959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-9-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tilburtjonc factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT jameskatherinem factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT sinicropepamelas factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT etondavidt factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT costellobriana factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT careyjantey factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT lanemelaniea factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT ehlersshawnal factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT erwinpatriciaj factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT nowakowskikatherinee factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview
AT muradmohammadh factorsinfluencingcancerriskperceptioninhighriskpopulationsasystematicreview