Cargando…

"Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and body mass index (BMI, kg.m(-2)) are established independent risk factors in the development of diabetes; we prospectively examined their relative contributions and joint relationship with incident diabetes in a Middle Eastern cohort. METHOD: participants of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadaegh, Farzad, Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza, Safarkhani, Maryam, Khalili, Davood, Azizi, Fereidoun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21609497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-383
_version_ 1782206541580992512
author Hadaegh, Farzad
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
Safarkhani, Maryam
Khalili, Davood
Azizi, Fereidoun
author_facet Hadaegh, Farzad
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
Safarkhani, Maryam
Khalili, Davood
Azizi, Fereidoun
author_sort Hadaegh, Farzad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and body mass index (BMI, kg.m(-2)) are established independent risk factors in the development of diabetes; we prospectively examined their relative contributions and joint relationship with incident diabetes in a Middle Eastern cohort. METHOD: participants of the ongoing Tehran lipid and glucose study are followed on a triennial basis. Among non-diabetic participants aged≥ 20 years at baseline (8,121) those with at least one follow-up examination (5,250) were included for the current study. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate sex-specific adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of baseline BMI-MetS categories (normal weight without MetS as reference group) for incident diabetes among 2186 men and 3064 women, aged ≥ 20 years, free of diabetes at baseline. RESULT: During follow up (median 6.5 years); there were 369 incident diabetes (147 in men). In women without MetS, the multivariate adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI≥30) participants were 2.3 (1.2-4.3) and 2.2 (1.0-4.7), respectively. The corresponding ORs for men without MetS were 1.6 (0.9-2.9) and 3.6 (1.5-8.4) respectively. As compared to the normal-weight/without MetS, normal-weight women and men with MetS, had a multivariate-adjusted ORs for incident diabetes of 8.8 (3.7-21.2) and 3.1 (1.3-7.0), respectively. The corresponding ORs for overweight and obese women with MetS reached to 7.7 (4.0-14.9) and 12.6 (6.9-23.2) and for men reached to 3.4(2.0-5.8) and 5.7(3.9-9.9), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of screening for MetS in normal weight individuals. Obesity increases diabetes risk in the absence of MetS, underscores the need for more stringent criteria to define healthy metabolic state among obese individuals. Weight reduction measures, thus, should be encouraged in conjunction with achieving metabolic targets not addressed by current definition of MetS, both in every day encounter and public health setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3119166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31191662011-06-22 "Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?" Hadaegh, Farzad Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza Safarkhani, Maryam Khalili, Davood Azizi, Fereidoun BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and body mass index (BMI, kg.m(-2)) are established independent risk factors in the development of diabetes; we prospectively examined their relative contributions and joint relationship with incident diabetes in a Middle Eastern cohort. METHOD: participants of the ongoing Tehran lipid and glucose study are followed on a triennial basis. Among non-diabetic participants aged≥ 20 years at baseline (8,121) those with at least one follow-up examination (5,250) were included for the current study. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate sex-specific adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of baseline BMI-MetS categories (normal weight without MetS as reference group) for incident diabetes among 2186 men and 3064 women, aged ≥ 20 years, free of diabetes at baseline. RESULT: During follow up (median 6.5 years); there were 369 incident diabetes (147 in men). In women without MetS, the multivariate adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI≥30) participants were 2.3 (1.2-4.3) and 2.2 (1.0-4.7), respectively. The corresponding ORs for men without MetS were 1.6 (0.9-2.9) and 3.6 (1.5-8.4) respectively. As compared to the normal-weight/without MetS, normal-weight women and men with MetS, had a multivariate-adjusted ORs for incident diabetes of 8.8 (3.7-21.2) and 3.1 (1.3-7.0), respectively. The corresponding ORs for overweight and obese women with MetS reached to 7.7 (4.0-14.9) and 12.6 (6.9-23.2) and for men reached to 3.4(2.0-5.8) and 5.7(3.9-9.9), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of screening for MetS in normal weight individuals. Obesity increases diabetes risk in the absence of MetS, underscores the need for more stringent criteria to define healthy metabolic state among obese individuals. Weight reduction measures, thus, should be encouraged in conjunction with achieving metabolic targets not addressed by current definition of MetS, both in every day encounter and public health setting. BioMed Central 2011-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3119166/ /pubmed/21609497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-383 Text en Copyright ©2011 Hadaegh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hadaegh, Farzad
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
Safarkhani, Maryam
Khalili, Davood
Azizi, Fereidoun
"Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
title "Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
title_full "Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
title_fullStr "Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
title_full_unstemmed "Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
title_short "Predictability of body mass index for diabetes: Affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
title_sort "predictability of body mass index for diabetes: affected by the presence of metabolic syndrome?"
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21609497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-383
work_keys_str_mv AT hadaeghfarzad predictabilityofbodymassindexfordiabetesaffectedbythepresenceofmetabolicsyndrome
AT bozorgmaneshmohammadreza predictabilityofbodymassindexfordiabetesaffectedbythepresenceofmetabolicsyndrome
AT safarkhanimaryam predictabilityofbodymassindexfordiabetesaffectedbythepresenceofmetabolicsyndrome
AT khalilidavood predictabilityofbodymassindexfordiabetesaffectedbythepresenceofmetabolicsyndrome
AT azizifereidoun predictabilityofbodymassindexfordiabetesaffectedbythepresenceofmetabolicsyndrome