Cargando…

Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) regain ambulatory function. However, during the first 3 months most of the patients are not able to walk unsupported. To enable ambulatory training at such an early stage the body weight is partially relieved and the leg moveme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wirz, Markus, Bastiaenen, Carolien, de Bie, Rob, Dietz, Volker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-60
_version_ 1782206542259421184
author Wirz, Markus
Bastiaenen, Carolien
de Bie, Rob
Dietz, Volker
author_facet Wirz, Markus
Bastiaenen, Carolien
de Bie, Rob
Dietz, Volker
author_sort Wirz, Markus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) regain ambulatory function. However, during the first 3 months most of the patients are not able to walk unsupported. To enable ambulatory training at such an early stage the body weight is partially relieved and the leg movements are assisted by two therapists. A more recent approach is the application of robotic based assistance which allows for longer training duration. From motor learning science and studies including patients with stroke, it is known that training effects depend on the duration of the training. Longer trainings result in a better walking function. The aim of the present study is to evaluate if prolonged robot assisted walking training leads to a better walking outcome in patients with incomplete SCI and whether such training is feasible or has undesirable effects. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients from multiple sites with a subacute incomplete SCI and who are not able to walk independently will be randomized to either standard training (3-5 sessions per week, session duration maximum 25 minutes) or an intensive training (3-5 sessions per week, session duration minimum 50 minutes). After 8 weeks of training and 4 months later the walking ability, the occurrence of adverse events and the perceived rate of exertion as well as the patients' impression of change will be compared between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01147185.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3119169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31191692011-06-22 Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial Wirz, Markus Bastiaenen, Carolien de Bie, Rob Dietz, Volker BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) regain ambulatory function. However, during the first 3 months most of the patients are not able to walk unsupported. To enable ambulatory training at such an early stage the body weight is partially relieved and the leg movements are assisted by two therapists. A more recent approach is the application of robotic based assistance which allows for longer training duration. From motor learning science and studies including patients with stroke, it is known that training effects depend on the duration of the training. Longer trainings result in a better walking function. The aim of the present study is to evaluate if prolonged robot assisted walking training leads to a better walking outcome in patients with incomplete SCI and whether such training is feasible or has undesirable effects. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients from multiple sites with a subacute incomplete SCI and who are not able to walk independently will be randomized to either standard training (3-5 sessions per week, session duration maximum 25 minutes) or an intensive training (3-5 sessions per week, session duration minimum 50 minutes). After 8 weeks of training and 4 months later the walking ability, the occurrence of adverse events and the perceived rate of exertion as well as the patients' impression of change will be compared between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT01147185. BioMed Central 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3119169/ /pubmed/21619574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-60 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wirz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wirz, Markus
Bastiaenen, Carolien
de Bie, Rob
Dietz, Volker
Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial
title Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial
title_full Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial
title_short Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial
title_sort effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled multicenter trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-60
work_keys_str_mv AT wirzmarkus effectivenessofautomatedlocomotortraininginpatientswithacuteincompletespinalcordinjuryarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT bastiaenencarolien effectivenessofautomatedlocomotortraininginpatientswithacuteincompletespinalcordinjuryarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT debierob effectivenessofautomatedlocomotortraininginpatientswithacuteincompletespinalcordinjuryarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial
AT dietzvolker effectivenessofautomatedlocomotortraininginpatientswithacuteincompletespinalcordinjuryarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrial