Cargando…
Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
(11)C-choline and (18)F-FAMT are known to correlate with tumor cell proliferation and amino acid metabolism. We investigated the ability of (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FAMT PET in diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors in thirty-six patients in comparison of (18)F-FDG PET. (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG PET w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21738405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/807929 |
_version_ | 1782206569185804288 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Mei Zhang, Hong Endo, Keigo |
author_facet | Tian, Mei Zhang, Hong Endo, Keigo |
author_sort | Tian, Mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | (11)C-choline and (18)F-FAMT are known to correlate with tumor cell proliferation and amino acid metabolism. We investigated the ability of (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FAMT PET in diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors in thirty-six patients in comparison of (18)F-FDG PET. (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG PET were positive in all the malignant tumors (n = 13), whereas (18)F-FAMT was positive in 11 tumors. The mean SUVs for malignant tumors were significantly higher than those for benign lesions in all three tracers imaging. A moderate correlation was found between (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG (r = 0.540, P < .05), or (18)F-FAMT and FDG (r = 0.596, P < .05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 91.7% and 71.4%, respectively, using (11)C-choline with a SUV cut-off of 2.69. The sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FAMT for malignancy were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively, using a SUV cut-off of 1.26. For (18)F-FDG, using a SUV cut-off of 2.77, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 71.4%, respectively. According to ROC analysis, the ROC curves for (11)C-Choline, (18)F-FAMT, and (18)F-FDG were 0.855, 0.734, and 0.847, respectively. (11)C-Choline PET is superior in the visualization of musculoskeletal tumors with high contrast imaging, whereas the combination of (18)F-FAMT and (18)F-FDG PET provides valuable information for the preoperative planning in patients with musculoskeletal tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3119418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31194182011-07-07 Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study Tian, Mei Zhang, Hong Endo, Keigo J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article (11)C-choline and (18)F-FAMT are known to correlate with tumor cell proliferation and amino acid metabolism. We investigated the ability of (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FAMT PET in diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors in thirty-six patients in comparison of (18)F-FDG PET. (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG PET were positive in all the malignant tumors (n = 13), whereas (18)F-FAMT was positive in 11 tumors. The mean SUVs for malignant tumors were significantly higher than those for benign lesions in all three tracers imaging. A moderate correlation was found between (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG (r = 0.540, P < .05), or (18)F-FAMT and FDG (r = 0.596, P < .05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 91.7% and 71.4%, respectively, using (11)C-choline with a SUV cut-off of 2.69. The sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FAMT for malignancy were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively, using a SUV cut-off of 1.26. For (18)F-FDG, using a SUV cut-off of 2.77, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 71.4%, respectively. According to ROC analysis, the ROC curves for (11)C-Choline, (18)F-FAMT, and (18)F-FDG were 0.855, 0.734, and 0.847, respectively. (11)C-Choline PET is superior in the visualization of musculoskeletal tumors with high contrast imaging, whereas the combination of (18)F-FAMT and (18)F-FDG PET provides valuable information for the preoperative planning in patients with musculoskeletal tumors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3119418/ /pubmed/21738405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/807929 Text en Copyright © 2011 Mei Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tian, Mei Zhang, Hong Endo, Keigo Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study |
title | Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study |
title_full | Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study |
title_short | Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study |
title_sort | comparison of cell proliferation, protein, and glucose metabolism in musculoskeletal tumors in a pet study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21738405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/807929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianmei comparisonofcellproliferationproteinandglucosemetabolisminmusculoskeletaltumorsinapetstudy AT zhanghong comparisonofcellproliferationproteinandglucosemetabolisminmusculoskeletaltumorsinapetstudy AT endokeigo comparisonofcellproliferationproteinandglucosemetabolisminmusculoskeletaltumorsinapetstudy |