Cargando…

Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study

(11)C-choline and (18)F-FAMT are known to correlate with tumor cell proliferation and amino acid metabolism. We investigated the ability of (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FAMT PET in diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors in thirty-six patients in comparison of (18)F-FDG PET. (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG PET w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Mei, Zhang, Hong, Endo, Keigo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21738405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/807929
_version_ 1782206569185804288
author Tian, Mei
Zhang, Hong
Endo, Keigo
author_facet Tian, Mei
Zhang, Hong
Endo, Keigo
author_sort Tian, Mei
collection PubMed
description (11)C-choline and (18)F-FAMT are known to correlate with tumor cell proliferation and amino acid metabolism. We investigated the ability of (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FAMT PET in diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors in thirty-six patients in comparison of (18)F-FDG PET. (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG PET were positive in all the malignant tumors (n = 13), whereas (18)F-FAMT was positive in 11 tumors. The mean SUVs for malignant tumors were significantly higher than those for benign lesions in all three tracers imaging. A moderate correlation was found between (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG (r = 0.540, P < .05), or (18)F-FAMT and FDG (r = 0.596, P < .05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 91.7% and 71.4%, respectively, using (11)C-choline with a SUV cut-off of 2.69. The sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FAMT for malignancy were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively, using a SUV cut-off of 1.26. For (18)F-FDG, using a SUV cut-off of 2.77, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 71.4%, respectively. According to ROC analysis, the ROC curves for (11)C-Choline, (18)F-FAMT, and (18)F-FDG were 0.855, 0.734, and 0.847, respectively. (11)C-Choline PET is superior in the visualization of musculoskeletal tumors with high contrast imaging, whereas the combination of (18)F-FAMT and (18)F-FDG PET provides valuable information for the preoperative planning in patients with musculoskeletal tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3119418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31194182011-07-07 Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study Tian, Mei Zhang, Hong Endo, Keigo J Biomed Biotechnol Research Article (11)C-choline and (18)F-FAMT are known to correlate with tumor cell proliferation and amino acid metabolism. We investigated the ability of (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FAMT PET in diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors in thirty-six patients in comparison of (18)F-FDG PET. (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG PET were positive in all the malignant tumors (n = 13), whereas (18)F-FAMT was positive in 11 tumors. The mean SUVs for malignant tumors were significantly higher than those for benign lesions in all three tracers imaging. A moderate correlation was found between (11)C-Choline and (18)F-FDG (r = 0.540, P < .05), or (18)F-FAMT and FDG (r = 0.596, P < .05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were 91.7% and 71.4%, respectively, using (11)C-choline with a SUV cut-off of 2.69. The sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FAMT for malignancy were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively, using a SUV cut-off of 1.26. For (18)F-FDG, using a SUV cut-off of 2.77, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 71.4%, respectively. According to ROC analysis, the ROC curves for (11)C-Choline, (18)F-FAMT, and (18)F-FDG were 0.855, 0.734, and 0.847, respectively. (11)C-Choline PET is superior in the visualization of musculoskeletal tumors with high contrast imaging, whereas the combination of (18)F-FAMT and (18)F-FDG PET provides valuable information for the preoperative planning in patients with musculoskeletal tumors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3119418/ /pubmed/21738405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/807929 Text en Copyright © 2011 Mei Tian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tian, Mei
Zhang, Hong
Endo, Keigo
Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
title Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
title_full Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
title_short Comparison of Cell Proliferation, Protein, and Glucose Metabolism in Musculoskeletal Tumors in a PET Study
title_sort comparison of cell proliferation, protein, and glucose metabolism in musculoskeletal tumors in a pet study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21738405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/807929
work_keys_str_mv AT tianmei comparisonofcellproliferationproteinandglucosemetabolisminmusculoskeletaltumorsinapetstudy
AT zhanghong comparisonofcellproliferationproteinandglucosemetabolisminmusculoskeletaltumorsinapetstudy
AT endokeigo comparisonofcellproliferationproteinandglucosemetabolisminmusculoskeletaltumorsinapetstudy