Cargando…

Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model

Background. Nerve stimulation can facilitate correct needle placement in peripheral regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine whether the high threshold current is associated with reduced nerve injury due to fewer needle-nerve contacts compared with low current. Methods. In anaesth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinfeldt, T., Graf, J., Schneider, J., Nimphius, W., Weihe, E., Borgeat, A., Wulf, H., Wiesmann, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/591851
_version_ 1782206575353528320
author Steinfeldt, T.
Graf, J.
Schneider, J.
Nimphius, W.
Weihe, E.
Borgeat, A.
Wulf, H.
Wiesmann, T.
author_facet Steinfeldt, T.
Graf, J.
Schneider, J.
Nimphius, W.
Weihe, E.
Borgeat, A.
Wulf, H.
Wiesmann, T.
author_sort Steinfeldt, T.
collection PubMed
description Background. Nerve stimulation can facilitate correct needle placement in peripheral regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine whether the high threshold current is associated with reduced nerve injury due to fewer needle-nerve contacts compared with low current. Methods. In anaesthetized pigs, thirty-two nerves of the brachial plexus underwent needle placement at low (0.2 mA) or high current (1.0 mA). The occurrence of needle-nerve contact was recorded. After 48 hours, the nerves were analyzed for occurrence of histological changes. Nerve injury was scored ranging from 0 (no injury) to 4 (severe injury). Results. The frequency of needle-nerve contact was 94% at low compared to 6% at high current. The score was significantly higher at low (median [interquartile range] 2.0 [1.0-2.0]) compared to high current (0.0 [0.0-1.0] P = .001). Conclusions. Inflammatory responses were directly related to needle-nerve contacts. Hence, posttraumatic inflammation may be diminished using higher current for nerve localization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3119464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31194642011-06-28 Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model Steinfeldt, T. Graf, J. Schneider, J. Nimphius, W. Weihe, E. Borgeat, A. Wulf, H. Wiesmann, T. Anesthesiol Res Pract Research Article Background. Nerve stimulation can facilitate correct needle placement in peripheral regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to determine whether the high threshold current is associated with reduced nerve injury due to fewer needle-nerve contacts compared with low current. Methods. In anaesthetized pigs, thirty-two nerves of the brachial plexus underwent needle placement at low (0.2 mA) or high current (1.0 mA). The occurrence of needle-nerve contact was recorded. After 48 hours, the nerves were analyzed for occurrence of histological changes. Nerve injury was scored ranging from 0 (no injury) to 4 (severe injury). Results. The frequency of needle-nerve contact was 94% at low compared to 6% at high current. The score was significantly higher at low (median [interquartile range] 2.0 [1.0-2.0]) compared to high current (0.0 [0.0-1.0] P = .001). Conclusions. Inflammatory responses were directly related to needle-nerve contacts. Hence, posttraumatic inflammation may be diminished using higher current for nerve localization. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3119464/ /pubmed/21716736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/591851 Text en Copyright © 2011 T. Steinfeldt et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Steinfeldt, T.
Graf, J.
Schneider, J.
Nimphius, W.
Weihe, E.
Borgeat, A.
Wulf, H.
Wiesmann, T.
Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model
title Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model
title_full Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model
title_fullStr Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model
title_full_unstemmed Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model
title_short Histological Consequences of Needle-Nerve Contact following Nerve Stimulation in a Pig Model
title_sort histological consequences of needle-nerve contact following nerve stimulation in a pig model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3119464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/591851
work_keys_str_mv AT steinfeldtt histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT grafj histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT schneiderj histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT nimphiusw histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT weihee histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT borgeata histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT wulfh histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel
AT wiesmannt histologicalconsequencesofneedlenervecontactfollowingnervestimulationinapigmodel