Cargando…

Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has dramatically improved the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure in large randomized clinical trials. Optimization of device settings may maximize benefit on an individual basis, although the best method for this is not yet established...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginks, Matthew R., Sciaraffia, Elena, Karlsson, Andreas, Gustafsson, John, Hamid, Shoaib, Bostock, Julian, Simon, Marcus, Blomström-Lundqvist, Carina, Rinaldi, C. Aldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21498849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur055
_version_ 1782206619781693440
author Ginks, Matthew R.
Sciaraffia, Elena
Karlsson, Andreas
Gustafsson, John
Hamid, Shoaib
Bostock, Julian
Simon, Marcus
Blomström-Lundqvist, Carina
Rinaldi, C. Aldo
author_facet Ginks, Matthew R.
Sciaraffia, Elena
Karlsson, Andreas
Gustafsson, John
Hamid, Shoaib
Bostock, Julian
Simon, Marcus
Blomström-Lundqvist, Carina
Rinaldi, C. Aldo
author_sort Ginks, Matthew R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has dramatically improved the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure in large randomized clinical trials. Optimization of device settings may maximize benefit on an individual basis, although the best method for this is not yet established. We evaluated the use of cardiogenic impedance measurements (derived from intracardiac impedance signals) in CRT device optimization, using invasive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt(max) as the reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment using a pressure wire placed in the LV cavity at the time of CRT device implantation. Intracardiac impedance measurements were made at different atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays and compared with LV dP/dt(max). We assessed the performance of patient-specific and generic impedance-based models in predicting acute haemodynamic response to CRT. In two patients, LV catheterization with the pressure wire was unsuccessful and in two patients LV lead delivery was unsuccessful; therefore, data were acquired for 13 out of 17 patients. Left ventricular dP/dt(max) was 919 ± 182 mmHg/s at baseline and this increased acutely (by 24%) to 1121 ± 226 mmHg/s as a result of CRT. The patient-specific impedance-based model correctly predicted the optimal haemodynamic response (to within 5% points) for AV and VV delays in 90 and 92% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cardiogenic impedance measurements are capable of correctly identifying the maximum achievable LV dP/dt(max) as measured by invasive haemodynamic assessment. This study suggests that cardiogenic impedance can potentially be used for CRT optimization and may have a role in ambulatory assessment of haemodynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3120133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31201332011-06-24 Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy Ginks, Matthew R. Sciaraffia, Elena Karlsson, Andreas Gustafsson, John Hamid, Shoaib Bostock, Julian Simon, Marcus Blomström-Lundqvist, Carina Rinaldi, C. Aldo Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has dramatically improved the symptoms and prognosis of patients with heart failure in large randomized clinical trials. Optimization of device settings may maximize benefit on an individual basis, although the best method for this is not yet established. We evaluated the use of cardiogenic impedance measurements (derived from intracardiac impedance signals) in CRT device optimization, using invasive left ventricular (LV) dP/dt(max) as the reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen patients underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment using a pressure wire placed in the LV cavity at the time of CRT device implantation. Intracardiac impedance measurements were made at different atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays and compared with LV dP/dt(max). We assessed the performance of patient-specific and generic impedance-based models in predicting acute haemodynamic response to CRT. In two patients, LV catheterization with the pressure wire was unsuccessful and in two patients LV lead delivery was unsuccessful; therefore, data were acquired for 13 out of 17 patients. Left ventricular dP/dt(max) was 919 ± 182 mmHg/s at baseline and this increased acutely (by 24%) to 1121 ± 226 mmHg/s as a result of CRT. The patient-specific impedance-based model correctly predicted the optimal haemodynamic response (to within 5% points) for AV and VV delays in 90 and 92% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cardiogenic impedance measurements are capable of correctly identifying the maximum achievable LV dP/dt(max) as measured by invasive haemodynamic assessment. This study suggests that cardiogenic impedance can potentially be used for CRT optimization and may have a role in ambulatory assessment of haemodynamics. Oxford University Press 2011-07 2011-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3120133/ /pubmed/21498849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur055 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Ginks, Matthew R.
Sciaraffia, Elena
Karlsson, Andreas
Gustafsson, John
Hamid, Shoaib
Bostock, Julian
Simon, Marcus
Blomström-Lundqvist, Carina
Rinaldi, C. Aldo
Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
title Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_fullStr Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_short Relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_sort relationship between intracardiac impedance and left ventricular contractility in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21498849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur055
work_keys_str_mv AT ginksmatthewr relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT sciaraffiaelena relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT karlssonandreas relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT gustafssonjohn relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT hamidshoaib relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT bostockjulian relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT simonmarcus relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT blomstromlundqvistcarina relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT rinaldicaldo relationshipbetweenintracardiacimpedanceandleftventricularcontractilityinpatientsundergoingcardiacresynchronizationtherapy