Cargando…

Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared proportional increases over time in waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). However this method is flawed. Here, we explain why comparisons of WC and BMI must take into account the relationship between them. We used data from two cross-sectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walls, Helen L, Peeters, Anna, Mannan, Haider, Stevenson, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21600056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-145
_version_ 1782206736833183744
author Walls, Helen L
Peeters, Anna
Mannan, Haider
Stevenson, Christopher
author_facet Walls, Helen L
Peeters, Anna
Mannan, Haider
Stevenson, Christopher
author_sort Walls, Helen L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared proportional increases over time in waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). However this method is flawed. Here, we explain why comparisons of WC and BMI must take into account the relationship between them. We used data from two cross-sectional US surveys (NHANES 1988-94 and 2005-06), and calculated the percentage change in the average BMI and the average WC between the two surveys, comparing the results with a regression analysis of changes in WC relative to BMI. FINDINGS: The crude percentage change in BMI (5.8%) was marginally greater than for WC (5.1%). But these percentages cannot be directly compared, as the relationship between the measures is described by a regression equation with an intercept term that does not equal zero. The coefficient of time from the regression equation will determine whether or not WC is on average larger for a given BMI at the second compared with the first time point. CONCLUSION: Differences in the percentage change in WC and the percentage change in BMI cannot be usefully directly compared. Comparisons of increases in the two measures must account for the relationship between them as described by the regression equation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3120697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31206972011-06-23 Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight Walls, Helen L Peeters, Anna Mannan, Haider Stevenson, Christopher BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared proportional increases over time in waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). However this method is flawed. Here, we explain why comparisons of WC and BMI must take into account the relationship between them. We used data from two cross-sectional US surveys (NHANES 1988-94 and 2005-06), and calculated the percentage change in the average BMI and the average WC between the two surveys, comparing the results with a regression analysis of changes in WC relative to BMI. FINDINGS: The crude percentage change in BMI (5.8%) was marginally greater than for WC (5.1%). But these percentages cannot be directly compared, as the relationship between the measures is described by a regression equation with an intercept term that does not equal zero. The coefficient of time from the regression equation will determine whether or not WC is on average larger for a given BMI at the second compared with the first time point. CONCLUSION: Differences in the percentage change in WC and the percentage change in BMI cannot be usefully directly compared. Comparisons of increases in the two measures must account for the relationship between them as described by the regression equation. BioMed Central 2011-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3120697/ /pubmed/21600056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-145 Text en Copyright ©2011 Walls et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Walls, Helen L
Peeters, Anna
Mannan, Haider
Stevenson, Christopher
Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
title Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
title_full Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
title_fullStr Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
title_full_unstemmed Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
title_short Methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
title_sort methodological problem with comparing increases in different measures of body weight
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21600056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-145
work_keys_str_mv AT wallshelenl methodologicalproblemwithcomparingincreasesindifferentmeasuresofbodyweight
AT peetersanna methodologicalproblemwithcomparingincreasesindifferentmeasuresofbodyweight
AT mannanhaider methodologicalproblemwithcomparingincreasesindifferentmeasuresofbodyweight
AT stevensonchristopher methodologicalproblemwithcomparingincreasesindifferentmeasuresofbodyweight