Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND: Information on cost-effectiveness of interventions to treat schizophrenia can assist health policy decision making, particularly given the lack of health resources in developing countries like Thailand. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment package, including drug and non-dr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phanthunane, Pudtan, Vos, Theo, Whiteford, Harvey, Bertram, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-6
_version_ 1782206752918339584
author Phanthunane, Pudtan
Vos, Theo
Whiteford, Harvey
Bertram, Melanie
author_facet Phanthunane, Pudtan
Vos, Theo
Whiteford, Harvey
Bertram, Melanie
author_sort Phanthunane, Pudtan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information on cost-effectiveness of interventions to treat schizophrenia can assist health policy decision making, particularly given the lack of health resources in developing countries like Thailand. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment package, including drug and non-drug interventions, for schizophrenia in Thailand. METHODS: A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of typical antipsychotics, generic risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine and family interventions. Health outcomes were measured in disability adjusted life years. We evaluated intervention benefit by estimating a change in disease severity, taking into account potential side effects. Intervention costs included outpatient treatment costs, hospitalization costs as well as time and travel costs of patients and families. Uncertainty was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. A sensitivity analysis of the expected range cost of generic risperidone was undertaken. RESULTS: Generic risperidone is more cost-effective than typicals if it can be produced for less than 10 baht per 2 mg tablet. Risperidone was the cheapest treatment with higher drug costs offset by lower hospital costs in comparison to typicals. The most cost-effective combination of treatments was a combination of risperidone (dominant intervention). Adding family intervention has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1,900 baht/DALY with a 100% probability of a result less than a threshold for very cost-effective interventions of one times GDP or 110,000 baht per DALY. Treating the most severe one third of patients with clozapine instead of risperidone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 320,000 baht/DALY with just over 50% probability of a result below three times GDP per capita. CONCLUSIONS: There are good economic arguments to recommend generic risperidone as first line treatment in combination with family intervention. As the uncertainty interval indicates the addition of clozapine may be dominated and there are serious side effects, treating severe patients with clozapine is advisable only for patients who do not respond to risperidone and only in the presence of a stricter side effect monitoring system than currently exists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3120770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31207702011-06-23 Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia Phanthunane, Pudtan Vos, Theo Whiteford, Harvey Bertram, Melanie Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Information on cost-effectiveness of interventions to treat schizophrenia can assist health policy decision making, particularly given the lack of health resources in developing countries like Thailand. This study aims to determine the optimal treatment package, including drug and non-drug interventions, for schizophrenia in Thailand. METHODS: A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of typical antipsychotics, generic risperidone, olanzapine, clozapine and family interventions. Health outcomes were measured in disability adjusted life years. We evaluated intervention benefit by estimating a change in disease severity, taking into account potential side effects. Intervention costs included outpatient treatment costs, hospitalization costs as well as time and travel costs of patients and families. Uncertainty was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. A sensitivity analysis of the expected range cost of generic risperidone was undertaken. RESULTS: Generic risperidone is more cost-effective than typicals if it can be produced for less than 10 baht per 2 mg tablet. Risperidone was the cheapest treatment with higher drug costs offset by lower hospital costs in comparison to typicals. The most cost-effective combination of treatments was a combination of risperidone (dominant intervention). Adding family intervention has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1,900 baht/DALY with a 100% probability of a result less than a threshold for very cost-effective interventions of one times GDP or 110,000 baht per DALY. Treating the most severe one third of patients with clozapine instead of risperidone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 320,000 baht/DALY with just over 50% probability of a result below three times GDP per capita. CONCLUSIONS: There are good economic arguments to recommend generic risperidone as first line treatment in combination with family intervention. As the uncertainty interval indicates the addition of clozapine may be dominated and there are serious side effects, treating severe patients with clozapine is advisable only for patients who do not respond to risperidone and only in the presence of a stricter side effect monitoring system than currently exists. BioMed Central 2011-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3120770/ /pubmed/21569448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-6 Text en Copyright ©2011 Phanthunane et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Phanthunane, Pudtan
Vos, Theo
Whiteford, Harvey
Bertram, Melanie
Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
title Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
title_full Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
title_short Cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
title_sort cost-effectiveness of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21569448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-9-6
work_keys_str_mv AT phanthunanepudtan costeffectivenessofpharmacologicalandpsychosocialinterventionsforschizophrenia
AT vostheo costeffectivenessofpharmacologicalandpsychosocialinterventionsforschizophrenia
AT whitefordharvey costeffectivenessofpharmacologicalandpsychosocialinterventionsforschizophrenia
AT bertrammelanie costeffectivenessofpharmacologicalandpsychosocialinterventionsforschizophrenia