Cargando…

The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods

BACKGROUND: The energy that animals devote to locomotion has been of intense interest to biologists for decades and two basic methodologies have emerged to predict locomotor energy expenditure: those based on metabolic and those based on mechanical energy. Metabolic energy approaches share the persp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kramer, Patricia Ann, Sylvester, Adam D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21731693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021290
_version_ 1782206771037732864
author Kramer, Patricia Ann
Sylvester, Adam D.
author_facet Kramer, Patricia Ann
Sylvester, Adam D.
author_sort Kramer, Patricia Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The energy that animals devote to locomotion has been of intense interest to biologists for decades and two basic methodologies have emerged to predict locomotor energy expenditure: those based on metabolic and those based on mechanical energy. Metabolic energy approaches share the perspective that prediction of locomotor energy expenditure should be based on statistically significant proxies of metabolic function, while mechanical energy approaches, which derive from many different perspectives, focus on quantifying the energy of movement. Some controversy exists as to which mechanical perspective is “best”, but from first principles all mechanical methods should be equivalent if the inputs to the simulation are of similar quality. Our goals in this paper are 1) to establish the degree to which the various methods of calculating mechanical energy are correlated, and 2) to investigate to what degree the prediction methods explain the variation in energy expenditure. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We use modern humans as the model organism in this experiment because their data are readily attainable, but the methodology is appropriate for use in other species. Volumetric oxygen consumption and kinematic and kinetic data were collected on 8 adults while walking at their self-selected slow, normal and fast velocities. Using hierarchical statistical modeling via ordinary least squares and maximum likelihood techniques, the predictive ability of several metabolic and mechanical approaches were assessed. We found that all approaches are correlated and that the mechanical approaches explain similar amounts of the variation in metabolic energy expenditure. Most methods predict the variation within an individual well, but are poor at accounting for variation between individuals. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the choice of predictive method is dependent on the question(s) of interest and the data available for use as inputs. Although we used modern humans as our model organism, these results can be extended to other species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3120855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31208552011-06-30 The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods Kramer, Patricia Ann Sylvester, Adam D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The energy that animals devote to locomotion has been of intense interest to biologists for decades and two basic methodologies have emerged to predict locomotor energy expenditure: those based on metabolic and those based on mechanical energy. Metabolic energy approaches share the perspective that prediction of locomotor energy expenditure should be based on statistically significant proxies of metabolic function, while mechanical energy approaches, which derive from many different perspectives, focus on quantifying the energy of movement. Some controversy exists as to which mechanical perspective is “best”, but from first principles all mechanical methods should be equivalent if the inputs to the simulation are of similar quality. Our goals in this paper are 1) to establish the degree to which the various methods of calculating mechanical energy are correlated, and 2) to investigate to what degree the prediction methods explain the variation in energy expenditure. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We use modern humans as the model organism in this experiment because their data are readily attainable, but the methodology is appropriate for use in other species. Volumetric oxygen consumption and kinematic and kinetic data were collected on 8 adults while walking at their self-selected slow, normal and fast velocities. Using hierarchical statistical modeling via ordinary least squares and maximum likelihood techniques, the predictive ability of several metabolic and mechanical approaches were assessed. We found that all approaches are correlated and that the mechanical approaches explain similar amounts of the variation in metabolic energy expenditure. Most methods predict the variation within an individual well, but are poor at accounting for variation between individuals. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the choice of predictive method is dependent on the question(s) of interest and the data available for use as inputs. Although we used modern humans as our model organism, these results can be extended to other species. Public Library of Science 2011-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3120855/ /pubmed/21731693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021290 Text en Kramer, Sylvester. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kramer, Patricia Ann
Sylvester, Adam D.
The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
title The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
title_full The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
title_fullStr The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
title_full_unstemmed The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
title_short The Energetic Cost of Walking: A Comparison of Predictive Methods
title_sort energetic cost of walking: a comparison of predictive methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3120855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21731693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021290
work_keys_str_mv AT kramerpatriciaann theenergeticcostofwalkingacomparisonofpredictivemethods
AT sylvesteradamd theenergeticcostofwalkingacomparisonofpredictivemethods
AT kramerpatriciaann energeticcostofwalkingacomparisonofpredictivemethods
AT sylvesteradamd energeticcostofwalkingacomparisonofpredictivemethods