Cargando…

Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer

In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LaFleur, Bonnie, Lee, Wooin, Billhiemer, Dean, Lockhart, Craig, Liu, Junmei, Merchant, Nipun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712958
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.79681
_version_ 1782206897399529472
author LaFleur, Bonnie
Lee, Wooin
Billhiemer, Dean
Lockhart, Craig
Liu, Junmei
Merchant, Nipun
author_facet LaFleur, Bonnie
Lee, Wooin
Billhiemer, Dean
Lockhart, Craig
Liu, Junmei
Merchant, Nipun
author_sort LaFleur, Bonnie
collection PubMed
description In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise measures, one only has information that the value is somewhere between 0 and the DL (below detection limit, BDL). Substitution of BDL values, with 0 or the DL can lead to biased parameter estimates and a loss of statistical power. Statistical methods that make adjustments when dealing with these types of data, often called left-censored data, are available in many commercial statistical packages. Despite this availability, the use of these methods is still not widespread in biomedical literature. We have reviewed the statistical approaches of dealing with BDL values, and used simulations to examine the performance of the commonly used substitution methods and the most widely available statistical methods. We have illustrated these methods using a study undertaken at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, to examine the serum bile acid levels in patients with colorectal cancer and adenoma. We have found that the modern methods for BDL values identify disease-related differences that are often missed, with statistically naive approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3122101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31221012011-06-27 Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer LaFleur, Bonnie Lee, Wooin Billhiemer, Dean Lockhart, Craig Liu, Junmei Merchant, Nipun J Carcinog Review Article In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise measures, one only has information that the value is somewhere between 0 and the DL (below detection limit, BDL). Substitution of BDL values, with 0 or the DL can lead to biased parameter estimates and a loss of statistical power. Statistical methods that make adjustments when dealing with these types of data, often called left-censored data, are available in many commercial statistical packages. Despite this availability, the use of these methods is still not widespread in biomedical literature. We have reviewed the statistical approaches of dealing with BDL values, and used simulations to examine the performance of the commonly used substitution methods and the most widely available statistical methods. We have illustrated these methods using a study undertaken at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, to examine the serum bile acid levels in patients with colorectal cancer and adenoma. We have found that the modern methods for BDL values identify disease-related differences that are often missed, with statistically naive approaches. Medknow Publications 2011-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3122101/ /pubmed/21712958 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.79681 Text en © 2011 LaFleur http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
LaFleur, Bonnie
Lee, Wooin
Billhiemer, Dean
Lockhart, Craig
Liu, Junmei
Merchant, Nipun
Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
title Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
title_full Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
title_short Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
title_sort statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712958
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.79681
work_keys_str_mv AT lafleurbonnie statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer
AT leewooin statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer
AT billhiemerdean statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer
AT lockhartcraig statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer
AT liujunmei statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer
AT merchantnipun statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer