Cargando…
Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer
In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise meas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712958 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.79681 |
_version_ | 1782206897399529472 |
---|---|
author | LaFleur, Bonnie Lee, Wooin Billhiemer, Dean Lockhart, Craig Liu, Junmei Merchant, Nipun |
author_facet | LaFleur, Bonnie Lee, Wooin Billhiemer, Dean Lockhart, Craig Liu, Junmei Merchant, Nipun |
author_sort | LaFleur, Bonnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise measures, one only has information that the value is somewhere between 0 and the DL (below detection limit, BDL). Substitution of BDL values, with 0 or the DL can lead to biased parameter estimates and a loss of statistical power. Statistical methods that make adjustments when dealing with these types of data, often called left-censored data, are available in many commercial statistical packages. Despite this availability, the use of these methods is still not widespread in biomedical literature. We have reviewed the statistical approaches of dealing with BDL values, and used simulations to examine the performance of the commonly used substitution methods and the most widely available statistical methods. We have illustrated these methods using a study undertaken at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, to examine the serum bile acid levels in patients with colorectal cancer and adenoma. We have found that the modern methods for BDL values identify disease-related differences that are often missed, with statistically naive approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3122101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31221012011-06-27 Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer LaFleur, Bonnie Lee, Wooin Billhiemer, Dean Lockhart, Craig Liu, Junmei Merchant, Nipun J Carcinog Review Article In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise measures, one only has information that the value is somewhere between 0 and the DL (below detection limit, BDL). Substitution of BDL values, with 0 or the DL can lead to biased parameter estimates and a loss of statistical power. Statistical methods that make adjustments when dealing with these types of data, often called left-censored data, are available in many commercial statistical packages. Despite this availability, the use of these methods is still not widespread in biomedical literature. We have reviewed the statistical approaches of dealing with BDL values, and used simulations to examine the performance of the commonly used substitution methods and the most widely available statistical methods. We have illustrated these methods using a study undertaken at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, to examine the serum bile acid levels in patients with colorectal cancer and adenoma. We have found that the modern methods for BDL values identify disease-related differences that are often missed, with statistically naive approaches. Medknow Publications 2011-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3122101/ /pubmed/21712958 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.79681 Text en © 2011 LaFleur http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article LaFleur, Bonnie Lee, Wooin Billhiemer, Dean Lockhart, Craig Liu, Junmei Merchant, Nipun Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
title | Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
title_full | Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
title_short | Statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: Serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
title_sort | statistical methods for assays with limits of detection: serum bile acid as a differentiator between patients with normal colons, adenomas, and colorectal cancer |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21712958 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1477-3163.79681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lafleurbonnie statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer AT leewooin statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer AT billhiemerdean statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer AT lockhartcraig statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer AT liujunmei statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer AT merchantnipun statisticalmethodsforassayswithlimitsofdetectionserumbileacidasadifferentiatorbetweenpatientswithnormalcolonsadenomasandcolorectalcancer |