Cargando…

Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand

BACKGROUND: Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS: We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study exami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seubsman, Sam-ang, Kelly, Matthew, Sleigh, Adrian, Peungson, Janya, Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan, Vilainerun, Duangkae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21615963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-166
_version_ 1782206947182772224
author Seubsman, Sam-ang
Kelly, Matthew
Sleigh, Adrian
Peungson, Janya
Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan
Vilainerun, Duangkae
author_facet Seubsman, Sam-ang
Kelly, Matthew
Sleigh, Adrian
Peungson, Janya
Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan
Vilainerun, Duangkae
author_sort Seubsman, Sam-ang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS: We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study examining the health transition underway in Thailand. We began the cohort study in 2005 with a baseline postal questionnaire sent to all 200,000 Thais enrolled as distance learning students at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University and residing all over Thailand; 87,134 or 44% of the students responded. Subsequently we used University and national media to inform cohort members of study progress. Also, we prepared a health book with study results and health advice which was distributed to all cohort members. After 4 years we repeated the survey and achieved a 71% response rate. In this paper we report the methods used to achieve this response The initial follow-up mail-out generated a response rate of about 48% reflecting the extensive preparatory work between baseline and follow-up. After 4 rounds of telephone contact (more than 100,000 phone calls) and 4 related mail-out rounds progressively over 16 months an overall response rate was achieved of just over 71% (n = 60,774). The total cost was US$4.06/respondent - 19% for printing, 21% for postage, 14% for tape measures (included in mail-out), 18% for data processing 22% for prizes and 6% for telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the methods reported as effective for mail questionnaire and cohort response rates held true for Thailand. These included being associated with a university, incentivating cooperation, follow-up contact, providing a second copy of questionnaire where necessary, and assurance of confidentiality. Telephone contact with the cohort and the small prizes given to responders were particularly important in the Thai context as was Thai leadership of the research team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3123220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31232202011-06-25 Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand Seubsman, Sam-ang Kelly, Matthew Sleigh, Adrian Peungson, Janya Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan Vilainerun, Duangkae BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS: We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study examining the health transition underway in Thailand. We began the cohort study in 2005 with a baseline postal questionnaire sent to all 200,000 Thais enrolled as distance learning students at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University and residing all over Thailand; 87,134 or 44% of the students responded. Subsequently we used University and national media to inform cohort members of study progress. Also, we prepared a health book with study results and health advice which was distributed to all cohort members. After 4 years we repeated the survey and achieved a 71% response rate. In this paper we report the methods used to achieve this response The initial follow-up mail-out generated a response rate of about 48% reflecting the extensive preparatory work between baseline and follow-up. After 4 rounds of telephone contact (more than 100,000 phone calls) and 4 related mail-out rounds progressively over 16 months an overall response rate was achieved of just over 71% (n = 60,774). The total cost was US$4.06/respondent - 19% for printing, 21% for postage, 14% for tape measures (included in mail-out), 18% for data processing 22% for prizes and 6% for telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the methods reported as effective for mail questionnaire and cohort response rates held true for Thailand. These included being associated with a university, incentivating cooperation, follow-up contact, providing a second copy of questionnaire where necessary, and assurance of confidentiality. Telephone contact with the cohort and the small prizes given to responders were particularly important in the Thai context as was Thai leadership of the research team. BioMed Central 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3123220/ /pubmed/21615963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-166 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kelly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Seubsman, Sam-ang
Kelly, Matthew
Sleigh, Adrian
Peungson, Janya
Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan
Vilainerun, Duangkae
Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
title Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
title_full Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
title_fullStr Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
title_short Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
title_sort methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in thailand
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21615963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-166
work_keys_str_mv AT seubsmansamang methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand
AT kellymatthew methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand
AT sleighadrian methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand
AT peungsonjanya methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand
AT chokkanapitakjaruwan methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand
AT vilainerunduangkae methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand