Cargando…
Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand
BACKGROUND: Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS: We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study exami...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21615963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-166 |
_version_ | 1782206947182772224 |
---|---|
author | Seubsman, Sam-ang Kelly, Matthew Sleigh, Adrian Peungson, Janya Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan Vilainerun, Duangkae |
author_facet | Seubsman, Sam-ang Kelly, Matthew Sleigh, Adrian Peungson, Janya Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan Vilainerun, Duangkae |
author_sort | Seubsman, Sam-ang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS: We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study examining the health transition underway in Thailand. We began the cohort study in 2005 with a baseline postal questionnaire sent to all 200,000 Thais enrolled as distance learning students at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University and residing all over Thailand; 87,134 or 44% of the students responded. Subsequently we used University and national media to inform cohort members of study progress. Also, we prepared a health book with study results and health advice which was distributed to all cohort members. After 4 years we repeated the survey and achieved a 71% response rate. In this paper we report the methods used to achieve this response The initial follow-up mail-out generated a response rate of about 48% reflecting the extensive preparatory work between baseline and follow-up. After 4 rounds of telephone contact (more than 100,000 phone calls) and 4 related mail-out rounds progressively over 16 months an overall response rate was achieved of just over 71% (n = 60,774). The total cost was US$4.06/respondent - 19% for printing, 21% for postage, 14% for tape measures (included in mail-out), 18% for data processing 22% for prizes and 6% for telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the methods reported as effective for mail questionnaire and cohort response rates held true for Thailand. These included being associated with a university, incentivating cooperation, follow-up contact, providing a second copy of questionnaire where necessary, and assurance of confidentiality. Telephone contact with the cohort and the small prizes given to responders were particularly important in the Thai context as was Thai leadership of the research team. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3123220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31232202011-06-25 Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand Seubsman, Sam-ang Kelly, Matthew Sleigh, Adrian Peungson, Janya Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan Vilainerun, Duangkae BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Ensuring successful follow-up is essential when conducting a prospective cohort study. Most existing literature reviewing methods to ensure a high response rate is based on experience in developed nations. FINDINGS: We report our 4-year follow-up success for a national cohort study examining the health transition underway in Thailand. We began the cohort study in 2005 with a baseline postal questionnaire sent to all 200,000 Thais enrolled as distance learning students at Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University and residing all over Thailand; 87,134 or 44% of the students responded. Subsequently we used University and national media to inform cohort members of study progress. Also, we prepared a health book with study results and health advice which was distributed to all cohort members. After 4 years we repeated the survey and achieved a 71% response rate. In this paper we report the methods used to achieve this response The initial follow-up mail-out generated a response rate of about 48% reflecting the extensive preparatory work between baseline and follow-up. After 4 rounds of telephone contact (more than 100,000 phone calls) and 4 related mail-out rounds progressively over 16 months an overall response rate was achieved of just over 71% (n = 60,774). The total cost was US$4.06/respondent - 19% for printing, 21% for postage, 14% for tape measures (included in mail-out), 18% for data processing 22% for prizes and 6% for telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the methods reported as effective for mail questionnaire and cohort response rates held true for Thailand. These included being associated with a university, incentivating cooperation, follow-up contact, providing a second copy of questionnaire where necessary, and assurance of confidentiality. Telephone contact with the cohort and the small prizes given to responders were particularly important in the Thai context as was Thai leadership of the research team. BioMed Central 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3123220/ /pubmed/21615963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-166 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kelly et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Seubsman, Sam-ang Kelly, Matthew Sleigh, Adrian Peungson, Janya Chokkanapitak, Jaruwan Vilainerun, Duangkae Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand |
title | Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand |
title_full | Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand |
title_fullStr | Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand |
title_short | Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand |
title_sort | methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in thailand |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21615963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-166 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seubsmansamang methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand AT kellymatthew methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand AT sleighadrian methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand AT peungsonjanya methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand AT chokkanapitakjaruwan methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand AT vilainerunduangkae methodsusedforsuccessfulfollowupinalargescalenationalcohortstudyinthailand |