Cargando…

Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: This study examines research knowledge infrastructures (RKIs) found in health systems. An RKI is defined as any instrument (i.e., programs, interventions, tools) implemented in order to facilitate access, dissemination, exchange, and/or use of evidence in healthcare organisations. Based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellen, Moriah E, Lavis, John N, Ouimet, Mathieu, Grimshaw, Jeremy, Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21645401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-60
_version_ 1782206949809455104
author Ellen, Moriah E
Lavis, John N
Ouimet, Mathieu
Grimshaw, Jeremy
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
author_facet Ellen, Moriah E
Lavis, John N
Ouimet, Mathieu
Grimshaw, Jeremy
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
author_sort Ellen, Moriah E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study examines research knowledge infrastructures (RKIs) found in health systems. An RKI is defined as any instrument (i.e., programs, interventions, tools) implemented in order to facilitate access, dissemination, exchange, and/or use of evidence in healthcare organisations. Based on an environmental scan (17 key informant interviews) and scoping review (26 studies), we found support for a framework that we developed that outlines components that a health system can have in its RKI. The broad domains are climate for research use, research production, activities used to link research to action, and evaluation. The objective of the current study is to profile the RKI of three types of health system organisations--regional health authorities, primary care practices, and hospitals--in two Canadian provinces to determine the current mix of components these organisations have in their RKI, their experience with these components, and their views about future RKI initiatives. METHODS: This study will include semistructured telephone interviews with a purposive sample region of a senior management team member, library/resource centre manager, and a 'knowledge broker' in three regional health authorities, five or six purposively sampled hospitals, and five or six primary care practices in Ontario and Quebec, for a maximum of 71 interviewees. The interviews will explore (a) which RKI components have proven helpful, (b) barriers and facilitators in implementing RKI components, and (c) views about next steps in further development of RKIs. DISCUSSION: This is the first qualitative examination of potential RKI efforts that can increase the use of research evidence in health system decision making. We anticipate being able to identify broadly applicable insights about important next steps in building effective RKIs. Some of the identified RKI components may increase the use of research evidence by decision makers, which may then lead to more informed decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3123231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31232312011-06-25 Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study Ellen, Moriah E Lavis, John N Ouimet, Mathieu Grimshaw, Jeremy Bédard, Pierre-Olivier Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: This study examines research knowledge infrastructures (RKIs) found in health systems. An RKI is defined as any instrument (i.e., programs, interventions, tools) implemented in order to facilitate access, dissemination, exchange, and/or use of evidence in healthcare organisations. Based on an environmental scan (17 key informant interviews) and scoping review (26 studies), we found support for a framework that we developed that outlines components that a health system can have in its RKI. The broad domains are climate for research use, research production, activities used to link research to action, and evaluation. The objective of the current study is to profile the RKI of three types of health system organisations--regional health authorities, primary care practices, and hospitals--in two Canadian provinces to determine the current mix of components these organisations have in their RKI, their experience with these components, and their views about future RKI initiatives. METHODS: This study will include semistructured telephone interviews with a purposive sample region of a senior management team member, library/resource centre manager, and a 'knowledge broker' in three regional health authorities, five or six purposively sampled hospitals, and five or six primary care practices in Ontario and Quebec, for a maximum of 71 interviewees. The interviews will explore (a) which RKI components have proven helpful, (b) barriers and facilitators in implementing RKI components, and (c) views about next steps in further development of RKIs. DISCUSSION: This is the first qualitative examination of potential RKI efforts that can increase the use of research evidence in health system decision making. We anticipate being able to identify broadly applicable insights about important next steps in building effective RKIs. Some of the identified RKI components may increase the use of research evidence by decision makers, which may then lead to more informed decisions. BioMed Central 2011-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3123231/ /pubmed/21645401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-60 Text en Copyright ©2011 Ellen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ellen, Moriah E
Lavis, John N
Ouimet, Mathieu
Grimshaw, Jeremy
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier
Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
title Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
title_full Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
title_short Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
title_sort determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21645401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-60
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenmoriahe determiningresearchknowledgeinfrastructureforhealthcaresystemsaqualitativestudy
AT lavisjohnn determiningresearchknowledgeinfrastructureforhealthcaresystemsaqualitativestudy
AT ouimetmathieu determiningresearchknowledgeinfrastructureforhealthcaresystemsaqualitativestudy
AT grimshawjeremy determiningresearchknowledgeinfrastructureforhealthcaresystemsaqualitativestudy
AT bedardpierreolivier determiningresearchknowledgeinfrastructureforhealthcaresystemsaqualitativestudy