Cargando…

Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination

BACKGROUND: In the Solomon Islands, the Malaria Eradication Programmes of the 1970s virtually eliminated the malaria vectors: Anopheles punctulatus and Anopheles koliensis, both late night biting, endophagic species. However, the vector, Anopheles farauti, changed its behaviour to bite early in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bugoro, Hugo, Cooper, Robert D, Butafa, Charles, Iro'ofa, Charles, Mackenzie, Donna O, Chen, Cheng-Chen, Russell, Tanya L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21592366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-133
_version_ 1782206952905900032
author Bugoro, Hugo
Cooper, Robert D
Butafa, Charles
Iro'ofa, Charles
Mackenzie, Donna O
Chen, Cheng-Chen
Russell, Tanya L
author_facet Bugoro, Hugo
Cooper, Robert D
Butafa, Charles
Iro'ofa, Charles
Mackenzie, Donna O
Chen, Cheng-Chen
Russell, Tanya L
author_sort Bugoro, Hugo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the Solomon Islands, the Malaria Eradication Programmes of the 1970s virtually eliminated the malaria vectors: Anopheles punctulatus and Anopheles koliensis, both late night biting, endophagic species. However, the vector, Anopheles farauti, changed its behaviour to bite early in the evening outdoors. Thus, An. farauti mosquitoes were able to avoid insecticide exposure and still maintain transmission. Thirty years on and the Solomon Islands are planning for intensified malaria control and localized elimination; but little is currently known about the behaviour of the vectors and how they will respond to intensified control. METHODS: In the elimination area, Temotu Province, standard entomological collection methods were conducted in typical coastal villages to determine the vector, its ecology, biting density, behaviour, longevity, and vector efficacy. These vector surveys were conducted pre-intervention and post-intervention following indoor residual spraying and distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets. RESULTS: Anopheles farauti was the only anopheline in Temotu Province. In 2008 (pre-intervention), this species occurred in moderate to high densities (19.5-78.5 bites/person/night) and expressed a tendency to bite outdoors, early in the night (peak biting time 6-8 pm). Surveys post intervention showed that there was little, if any, reduction in biting densities and no reduction in the longevity of the vector population. After adjusting for human behaviour, indoor biting was reduced from 57% pre-intervention to 40% post-intervention. CONCLUSION: In an effort to learn from historical mistakes and develop successful elimination programmes, there is a need for implementing complimentary vector control tools that can target exophagic and early biting vectors. Intensified indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticide net use has further promoted the early, outdoor feeding behaviour of An. farauti in the Solomon Islands. Consequently, the effectiveness of IRS and the personal protection provided by bed nets is compromised. To achieve elimination, any residual transmission should be targeted using integrated vector control incorporating complementary tools such as larviciding and/or zooprophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3123245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31232452011-06-25 Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination Bugoro, Hugo Cooper, Robert D Butafa, Charles Iro'ofa, Charles Mackenzie, Donna O Chen, Cheng-Chen Russell, Tanya L Malar J Research BACKGROUND: In the Solomon Islands, the Malaria Eradication Programmes of the 1970s virtually eliminated the malaria vectors: Anopheles punctulatus and Anopheles koliensis, both late night biting, endophagic species. However, the vector, Anopheles farauti, changed its behaviour to bite early in the evening outdoors. Thus, An. farauti mosquitoes were able to avoid insecticide exposure and still maintain transmission. Thirty years on and the Solomon Islands are planning for intensified malaria control and localized elimination; but little is currently known about the behaviour of the vectors and how they will respond to intensified control. METHODS: In the elimination area, Temotu Province, standard entomological collection methods were conducted in typical coastal villages to determine the vector, its ecology, biting density, behaviour, longevity, and vector efficacy. These vector surveys were conducted pre-intervention and post-intervention following indoor residual spraying and distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets. RESULTS: Anopheles farauti was the only anopheline in Temotu Province. In 2008 (pre-intervention), this species occurred in moderate to high densities (19.5-78.5 bites/person/night) and expressed a tendency to bite outdoors, early in the night (peak biting time 6-8 pm). Surveys post intervention showed that there was little, if any, reduction in biting densities and no reduction in the longevity of the vector population. After adjusting for human behaviour, indoor biting was reduced from 57% pre-intervention to 40% post-intervention. CONCLUSION: In an effort to learn from historical mistakes and develop successful elimination programmes, there is a need for implementing complimentary vector control tools that can target exophagic and early biting vectors. Intensified indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticide net use has further promoted the early, outdoor feeding behaviour of An. farauti in the Solomon Islands. Consequently, the effectiveness of IRS and the personal protection provided by bed nets is compromised. To achieve elimination, any residual transmission should be targeted using integrated vector control incorporating complementary tools such as larviciding and/or zooprophylaxis. BioMed Central 2011-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3123245/ /pubmed/21592366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-133 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bugoro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bugoro, Hugo
Cooper, Robert D
Butafa, Charles
Iro'ofa, Charles
Mackenzie, Donna O
Chen, Cheng-Chen
Russell, Tanya L
Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination
title Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination
title_full Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination
title_fullStr Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination
title_full_unstemmed Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination
title_short Bionomics of the malaria vector Anopheles farauti in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands: issues for malaria elimination
title_sort bionomics of the malaria vector anopheles farauti in temotu province, solomon islands: issues for malaria elimination
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21592366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-10-133
work_keys_str_mv AT bugorohugo bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination
AT cooperrobertd bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination
AT butafacharles bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination
AT iroofacharles bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination
AT mackenziedonnao bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination
AT chenchengchen bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination
AT russelltanyal bionomicsofthemalariavectoranophelesfarautiintemotuprovincesolomonislandsissuesformalariaelimination