Cargando…

The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis

Background. Uraemic toxins in the 8 to 60 kDa molecular weight range have been attracting increasing attention in dialysis therapy. However, there are no available standardized methods to evaluate their removal. Using new filtering membranes, we evaluated SDS–PAGE of spent dialysate to assess cut-of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ficheux, Alain, Gayrard, Nathalie, Szwarc, Ilan, Andress, Daniel, Soullier, Stéphan, Duny, Yohan, Goubert, Gilles, Thomas, Marie, Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna, Daurès, Jean-Pierre, Brunet, Philippe, Servel, Marie-Françoise, Argilés, Àngel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq709
_version_ 1782207076083171328
author Ficheux, Alain
Gayrard, Nathalie
Szwarc, Ilan
Andress, Daniel
Soullier, Stéphan
Duny, Yohan
Goubert, Gilles
Thomas, Marie
Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Brunet, Philippe
Servel, Marie-Françoise
Argilés, Àngel
author_facet Ficheux, Alain
Gayrard, Nathalie
Szwarc, Ilan
Andress, Daniel
Soullier, Stéphan
Duny, Yohan
Goubert, Gilles
Thomas, Marie
Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Brunet, Philippe
Servel, Marie-Françoise
Argilés, Àngel
author_sort Ficheux, Alain
collection PubMed
description Background. Uraemic toxins in the 8 to 60 kDa molecular weight range have been attracting increasing attention in dialysis therapy. However, there are no available standardized methods to evaluate their removal. Using new filtering membranes, we evaluated SDS–PAGE of spent dialysate to assess cut-off ranges and removal capacities into dialysate, while also measuring classical markers of dialyser function. Methods. Eighteen dialysis patients were washed out for 2 weeks with FX 100 (Helixone(®)), followed by randomization to Xevonta Hi 23 (Amembris(®)) or FX dialysers for 2 weeks, then crossed over for an additional 2 weeks, and finally placed on Xenium 210 (Purema(®)) for 2 weeks. SDS–PAGE scanning of the removed proteins contained in the spent dialysate was performed during all dialysis sessions. Total mass of urea, creatinine, total proteins, beta 2 microglobulin (β2m), retinol-binding protein (RBP) and albumin were measured. The reduction rates of serum urea, creatinine, β2m, leptin, RBP, alpha 1-antitrypsin, albumin and total proteins were also determined. Results. SDS–PAGE scanning identified four major protein peaks (10–18, 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa molecular weight) and showed clear differences in the amounts of removed proteins between the dialysers, particularly in the 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa ranges. Total mass of removed β2m, RBP and albumin were in agreement with SDS–PAGE, while serum assays showed differing results. Conclusions. SDS–PAGE scanning provided a good characterization of protein patterns in the spent dialysate; it extended and agreed with protein determinations and allowed a better assessment of dialyser performance in removing 10 to 80 kDa molecular weight substances. It also identified differences between the three mainly filtrating polysulfone dialysers that were not detected with blood measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3124329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31243292011-07-05 The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis Ficheux, Alain Gayrard, Nathalie Szwarc, Ilan Andress, Daniel Soullier, Stéphan Duny, Yohan Goubert, Gilles Thomas, Marie Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna Daurès, Jean-Pierre Brunet, Philippe Servel, Marie-Françoise Argilés, Àngel Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Article Background. Uraemic toxins in the 8 to 60 kDa molecular weight range have been attracting increasing attention in dialysis therapy. However, there are no available standardized methods to evaluate their removal. Using new filtering membranes, we evaluated SDS–PAGE of spent dialysate to assess cut-off ranges and removal capacities into dialysate, while also measuring classical markers of dialyser function. Methods. Eighteen dialysis patients were washed out for 2 weeks with FX 100 (Helixone(®)), followed by randomization to Xevonta Hi 23 (Amembris(®)) or FX dialysers for 2 weeks, then crossed over for an additional 2 weeks, and finally placed on Xenium 210 (Purema(®)) for 2 weeks. SDS–PAGE scanning of the removed proteins contained in the spent dialysate was performed during all dialysis sessions. Total mass of urea, creatinine, total proteins, beta 2 microglobulin (β2m), retinol-binding protein (RBP) and albumin were measured. The reduction rates of serum urea, creatinine, β2m, leptin, RBP, alpha 1-antitrypsin, albumin and total proteins were also determined. Results. SDS–PAGE scanning identified four major protein peaks (10–18, 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa molecular weight) and showed clear differences in the amounts of removed proteins between the dialysers, particularly in the 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa ranges. Total mass of removed β2m, RBP and albumin were in agreement with SDS–PAGE, while serum assays showed differing results. Conclusions. SDS–PAGE scanning provided a good characterization of protein patterns in the spent dialysate; it extended and agreed with protein determinations and allowed a better assessment of dialyser performance in removing 10 to 80 kDa molecular weight substances. It also identified differences between the three mainly filtrating polysulfone dialysers that were not detected with blood measurements. Oxford University Press 2011-07 2010-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3124329/ /pubmed/21148683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq709 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ficheux, Alain
Gayrard, Nathalie
Szwarc, Ilan
Andress, Daniel
Soullier, Stéphan
Duny, Yohan
Goubert, Gilles
Thomas, Marie
Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna
Daurès, Jean-Pierre
Brunet, Philippe
Servel, Marie-Françoise
Argilés, Àngel
The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
title The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
title_full The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
title_fullStr The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
title_full_unstemmed The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
title_short The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
title_sort use of sds–page scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq709
work_keys_str_mv AT ficheuxalain theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT gayrardnathalie theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT szwarcilan theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT andressdaniel theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT soullierstephan theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT dunyyohan theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT goubertgilles theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT thomasmarie theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT bismuthmondolfojohanna theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT dauresjeanpierre theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT brunetphilippe theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT servelmariefrancoise theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT argilesangel theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT ficheuxalain useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT gayrardnathalie useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT szwarcilan useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT andressdaniel useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT soullierstephan useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT dunyyohan useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT goubertgilles useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT thomasmarie useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT bismuthmondolfojohanna useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT dauresjeanpierre useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT brunetphilippe useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT servelmariefrancoise useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis
AT argilesangel useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis