Cargando…
The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis
Background. Uraemic toxins in the 8 to 60 kDa molecular weight range have been attracting increasing attention in dialysis therapy. However, there are no available standardized methods to evaluate their removal. Using new filtering membranes, we evaluated SDS–PAGE of spent dialysate to assess cut-of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq709 |
_version_ | 1782207076083171328 |
---|---|
author | Ficheux, Alain Gayrard, Nathalie Szwarc, Ilan Andress, Daniel Soullier, Stéphan Duny, Yohan Goubert, Gilles Thomas, Marie Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna Daurès, Jean-Pierre Brunet, Philippe Servel, Marie-Françoise Argilés, Àngel |
author_facet | Ficheux, Alain Gayrard, Nathalie Szwarc, Ilan Andress, Daniel Soullier, Stéphan Duny, Yohan Goubert, Gilles Thomas, Marie Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna Daurès, Jean-Pierre Brunet, Philippe Servel, Marie-Françoise Argilés, Àngel |
author_sort | Ficheux, Alain |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Uraemic toxins in the 8 to 60 kDa molecular weight range have been attracting increasing attention in dialysis therapy. However, there are no available standardized methods to evaluate their removal. Using new filtering membranes, we evaluated SDS–PAGE of spent dialysate to assess cut-off ranges and removal capacities into dialysate, while also measuring classical markers of dialyser function. Methods. Eighteen dialysis patients were washed out for 2 weeks with FX 100 (Helixone(®)), followed by randomization to Xevonta Hi 23 (Amembris(®)) or FX dialysers for 2 weeks, then crossed over for an additional 2 weeks, and finally placed on Xenium 210 (Purema(®)) for 2 weeks. SDS–PAGE scanning of the removed proteins contained in the spent dialysate was performed during all dialysis sessions. Total mass of urea, creatinine, total proteins, beta 2 microglobulin (β2m), retinol-binding protein (RBP) and albumin were measured. The reduction rates of serum urea, creatinine, β2m, leptin, RBP, alpha 1-antitrypsin, albumin and total proteins were also determined. Results. SDS–PAGE scanning identified four major protein peaks (10–18, 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa molecular weight) and showed clear differences in the amounts of removed proteins between the dialysers, particularly in the 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa ranges. Total mass of removed β2m, RBP and albumin were in agreement with SDS–PAGE, while serum assays showed differing results. Conclusions. SDS–PAGE scanning provided a good characterization of protein patterns in the spent dialysate; it extended and agreed with protein determinations and allowed a better assessment of dialyser performance in removing 10 to 80 kDa molecular weight substances. It also identified differences between the three mainly filtrating polysulfone dialysers that were not detected with blood measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3124329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31243292011-07-05 The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis Ficheux, Alain Gayrard, Nathalie Szwarc, Ilan Andress, Daniel Soullier, Stéphan Duny, Yohan Goubert, Gilles Thomas, Marie Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna Daurès, Jean-Pierre Brunet, Philippe Servel, Marie-Françoise Argilés, Àngel Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Article Background. Uraemic toxins in the 8 to 60 kDa molecular weight range have been attracting increasing attention in dialysis therapy. However, there are no available standardized methods to evaluate their removal. Using new filtering membranes, we evaluated SDS–PAGE of spent dialysate to assess cut-off ranges and removal capacities into dialysate, while also measuring classical markers of dialyser function. Methods. Eighteen dialysis patients were washed out for 2 weeks with FX 100 (Helixone(®)), followed by randomization to Xevonta Hi 23 (Amembris(®)) or FX dialysers for 2 weeks, then crossed over for an additional 2 weeks, and finally placed on Xenium 210 (Purema(®)) for 2 weeks. SDS–PAGE scanning of the removed proteins contained in the spent dialysate was performed during all dialysis sessions. Total mass of urea, creatinine, total proteins, beta 2 microglobulin (β2m), retinol-binding protein (RBP) and albumin were measured. The reduction rates of serum urea, creatinine, β2m, leptin, RBP, alpha 1-antitrypsin, albumin and total proteins were also determined. Results. SDS–PAGE scanning identified four major protein peaks (10–18, 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa molecular weight) and showed clear differences in the amounts of removed proteins between the dialysers, particularly in the 20–22.5, 23–30 and 60–80 kDa ranges. Total mass of removed β2m, RBP and albumin were in agreement with SDS–PAGE, while serum assays showed differing results. Conclusions. SDS–PAGE scanning provided a good characterization of protein patterns in the spent dialysate; it extended and agreed with protein determinations and allowed a better assessment of dialyser performance in removing 10 to 80 kDa molecular weight substances. It also identified differences between the three mainly filtrating polysulfone dialysers that were not detected with blood measurements. Oxford University Press 2011-07 2010-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3124329/ /pubmed/21148683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq709 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ficheux, Alain Gayrard, Nathalie Szwarc, Ilan Andress, Daniel Soullier, Stéphan Duny, Yohan Goubert, Gilles Thomas, Marie Bismuth-Mondolfo, Johanna Daurès, Jean-Pierre Brunet, Philippe Servel, Marie-Françoise Argilés, Àngel The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
title | The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
title_full | The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
title_fullStr | The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
title_short | The use of SDS–PAGE scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
title_sort | use of sds–page scanning of spent dialysate to assess uraemic toxin removal by dialysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ficheuxalain theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT gayrardnathalie theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT szwarcilan theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT andressdaniel theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT soullierstephan theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT dunyyohan theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT goubertgilles theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT thomasmarie theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT bismuthmondolfojohanna theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT dauresjeanpierre theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT brunetphilippe theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT servelmariefrancoise theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT argilesangel theuseofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT ficheuxalain useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT gayrardnathalie useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT szwarcilan useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT andressdaniel useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT soullierstephan useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT dunyyohan useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT goubertgilles useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT thomasmarie useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT bismuthmondolfojohanna useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT dauresjeanpierre useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT brunetphilippe useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT servelmariefrancoise useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis AT argilesangel useofsdspagescanningofspentdialysatetoassessuraemictoxinremovalbydialysis |