Cargando…
Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results
BACKGROUND: Studies integrating transcriptomic data with proteomic data can illuminate the proteome more clearly than either separately. Integromic studies can deepen understanding of the dynamic complex regulatory relationship between the transcriptome and the proteome. Integrating these data dicta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-213 |
_version_ | 1782207088691249152 |
---|---|
author | Day, Roger S McDade, Kevin K Chandran, Uma R Lisovich, Alex Conrads, Thomas P Hood, Brian L Kolli, VS Kumar Kirchner, David Litzi, Traci Maxwell, G Larry |
author_facet | Day, Roger S McDade, Kevin K Chandran, Uma R Lisovich, Alex Conrads, Thomas P Hood, Brian L Kolli, VS Kumar Kirchner, David Litzi, Traci Maxwell, G Larry |
author_sort | Day, Roger S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies integrating transcriptomic data with proteomic data can illuminate the proteome more clearly than either separately. Integromic studies can deepen understanding of the dynamic complex regulatory relationship between the transcriptome and the proteome. Integrating these data dictates a reliable mapping between the identifier nomenclature resultant from the two high-throughput platforms. However, this kind of analysis is well known to be hampered by lack of standardization of identifier nomenclature among proteins, genes, and microarray probe sets. Therefore data integration may also play a role in critiquing the fallible gene identifications that both platforms emit. RESULTS: We compared three freely available internet-based identifier mapping resources for mapping UniProt accessions (ACCs) to Affymetrix probesets identifications (IDs): DAVID, EnVision, and NetAffx. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses of 91 endometrial cancer and 7 noncancer samples generated 11,879 distinct ACCs. For each ACC, we compared the retrieval sets of probeset IDs from each mapping resource. We confirmed a high level of discrepancy among the mapping resources. On the same samples, mRNA expression was available. Therefore, to evaluate the quality of each ACC-to-probeset match, we calculated proteome-transcriptome correlations, and compared the resources presuming that better mapping of identifiers should generate a higher proportion of mapped pairs with strong inter-platform correlations. A mixture model for the correlations fitted well and supported regression analysis, providing a window into the performance of the mapping resources. The resources have added and dropped matches over two years, but their overall performance has not changed. CONCLUSIONS: The methods presented here serve to achieve concrete context-specific insight, to support well-informed decisions in choosing an ID mapping strategy for "omic" data merging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3124437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31244372011-06-28 Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results Day, Roger S McDade, Kevin K Chandran, Uma R Lisovich, Alex Conrads, Thomas P Hood, Brian L Kolli, VS Kumar Kirchner, David Litzi, Traci Maxwell, G Larry BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Studies integrating transcriptomic data with proteomic data can illuminate the proteome more clearly than either separately. Integromic studies can deepen understanding of the dynamic complex regulatory relationship between the transcriptome and the proteome. Integrating these data dictates a reliable mapping between the identifier nomenclature resultant from the two high-throughput platforms. However, this kind of analysis is well known to be hampered by lack of standardization of identifier nomenclature among proteins, genes, and microarray probe sets. Therefore data integration may also play a role in critiquing the fallible gene identifications that both platforms emit. RESULTS: We compared three freely available internet-based identifier mapping resources for mapping UniProt accessions (ACCs) to Affymetrix probesets identifications (IDs): DAVID, EnVision, and NetAffx. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analyses of 91 endometrial cancer and 7 noncancer samples generated 11,879 distinct ACCs. For each ACC, we compared the retrieval sets of probeset IDs from each mapping resource. We confirmed a high level of discrepancy among the mapping resources. On the same samples, mRNA expression was available. Therefore, to evaluate the quality of each ACC-to-probeset match, we calculated proteome-transcriptome correlations, and compared the resources presuming that better mapping of identifiers should generate a higher proportion of mapped pairs with strong inter-platform correlations. A mixture model for the correlations fitted well and supported regression analysis, providing a window into the performance of the mapping resources. The resources have added and dropped matches over two years, but their overall performance has not changed. CONCLUSIONS: The methods presented here serve to achieve concrete context-specific insight, to support well-informed decisions in choosing an ID mapping strategy for "omic" data merging. BioMed Central 2011-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3124437/ /pubmed/21619611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-213 Text en Copyright ©2011 Day et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Day, Roger S McDade, Kevin K Chandran, Uma R Lisovich, Alex Conrads, Thomas P Hood, Brian L Kolli, VS Kumar Kirchner, David Litzi, Traci Maxwell, G Larry Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
title | Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
title_full | Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
title_fullStr | Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
title_short | Identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
title_sort | identifier mapping performance for integrating transcriptomics and proteomics experimental results |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dayrogers identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT mcdadekevink identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT chandranumar identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT lisovichalex identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT conradsthomasp identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT hoodbrianl identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT kollivskumar identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT kirchnerdavid identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT litzitraci identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults AT maxwellglarry identifiermappingperformanceforintegratingtranscriptomicsandproteomicsexperimentalresults |