Cargando…
Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice
Diabetes management is firmly based within the primary care community. Landmark randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that even modest reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) can yield improvements in economic and medical end-points. Diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease associate...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare Communications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22127768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0014-4 |
_version_ | 1782207111850098688 |
---|---|
author | Unger, Jeff |
author_facet | Unger, Jeff |
author_sort | Unger, Jeff |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetes management is firmly based within the primary care community. Landmark randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that even modest reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) can yield improvements in economic and medical end-points. Diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease associated with loss of pancreatic β-cell function. Therefore, most patients will eventually require insulin therapies in order to achieve their individualized targeted HbA(1c) as their β-cell function and mass wanes. Although clinicians understand the importance of early insulin initiation, there is little agreement as to when to introduce insulin as a therapeutic option. Once initiated, questions remain as to whether to allow the patients to self-titrate their dose or whether the dosing should be tightly regulated by the clinician. Physicians have many evidence-based basal insulin protocols from which to choose, all of which have been shown to drive HbA1c levels to the American Diabetes Association target of ≤7%. This article will discuss ways by which insulin therapies can be effectively introduced to patients within busy primary care practices. Published evidence-based basal insulin protocols will be evaluated for safety and efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3124644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare Communications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31246442011-08-02 Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice Unger, Jeff Diabetes Ther Review Diabetes management is firmly based within the primary care community. Landmark randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated that even modest reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) can yield improvements in economic and medical end-points. Diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease associated with loss of pancreatic β-cell function. Therefore, most patients will eventually require insulin therapies in order to achieve their individualized targeted HbA(1c) as their β-cell function and mass wanes. Although clinicians understand the importance of early insulin initiation, there is little agreement as to when to introduce insulin as a therapeutic option. Once initiated, questions remain as to whether to allow the patients to self-titrate their dose or whether the dosing should be tightly regulated by the clinician. Physicians have many evidence-based basal insulin protocols from which to choose, all of which have been shown to drive HbA1c levels to the American Diabetes Association target of ≤7%. This article will discuss ways by which insulin therapies can be effectively introduced to patients within busy primary care practices. Published evidence-based basal insulin protocols will be evaluated for safety and efficacy. Springer Healthcare Communications 2011-01-25 2011-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3124644/ /pubmed/22127768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0014-4 Text en © Springer Healthcare 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Unger, Jeff Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
title | Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
title_full | Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
title_fullStr | Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
title_short | Comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
title_sort | comparing the efficacy, safety, and utility of intensive insulin algorithms for a primary care practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22127768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-010-0014-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ungerjeff comparingtheefficacysafetyandutilityofintensiveinsulinalgorithmsforaprimarycarepractice |