Cargando…
The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
Allergic contact dermatitis is the second most commonly reported occupational illness, accounting for 10% to 15% of all occupational diseases. This highlights the importance of developing rapid and sensitive methods for hazard identification of chemical sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/424203 |
_version_ | 1782207138125316096 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Stacey E. Siegel, Paul D. Meade, B. J. |
author_facet | Anderson, Stacey E. Siegel, Paul D. Meade, B. J. |
author_sort | Anderson, Stacey E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Allergic contact dermatitis is the second most commonly reported occupational illness, accounting for 10% to 15% of all occupational diseases. This highlights the importance of developing rapid and sensitive methods for hazard identification of chemical sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed and validated for the identification of low molecular weight sensitizing chemicals. It provides several benefits over other tests for sensitization because it provides a quantitative endpoint, dose-responsive data, and allows for prediction of potency. However, there are also several concerns with this assay including: levels of false positive responses, variability due to vehicle, and predictivity. This report serves as a concise review which briefly summarizes the progress, advances and limitations of the assay over the last decade. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3124934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31249342011-07-11 The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations Anderson, Stacey E. Siegel, Paul D. Meade, B. J. J Allergy (Cairo) Review Article Allergic contact dermatitis is the second most commonly reported occupational illness, accounting for 10% to 15% of all occupational diseases. This highlights the importance of developing rapid and sensitive methods for hazard identification of chemical sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed and validated for the identification of low molecular weight sensitizing chemicals. It provides several benefits over other tests for sensitization because it provides a quantitative endpoint, dose-responsive data, and allows for prediction of potency. However, there are also several concerns with this assay including: levels of false positive responses, variability due to vehicle, and predictivity. This report serves as a concise review which briefly summarizes the progress, advances and limitations of the assay over the last decade. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3124934/ /pubmed/21747867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/424203 Text en Copyright © 2011 Stacey E. Anderson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Anderson, Stacey E. Siegel, Paul D. Meade, B. J. The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations |
title | The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations |
title_full | The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations |
title_fullStr | The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations |
title_full_unstemmed | The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations |
title_short | The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations |
title_sort | llna: a brief review of recent advances and limitations |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/424203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonstaceye thellnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations AT siegelpauld thellnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations AT meadebj thellnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations AT andersonstaceye llnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations AT siegelpauld llnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations AT meadebj llnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations |