Cargando…

The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations

Allergic contact dermatitis is the second most commonly reported occupational illness, accounting for 10% to 15% of all occupational diseases. This highlights the importance of developing rapid and sensitive methods for hazard identification of chemical sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Stacey E., Siegel, Paul D., Meade, B. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/424203
_version_ 1782207138125316096
author Anderson, Stacey E.
Siegel, Paul D.
Meade, B. J.
author_facet Anderson, Stacey E.
Siegel, Paul D.
Meade, B. J.
author_sort Anderson, Stacey E.
collection PubMed
description Allergic contact dermatitis is the second most commonly reported occupational illness, accounting for 10% to 15% of all occupational diseases. This highlights the importance of developing rapid and sensitive methods for hazard identification of chemical sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed and validated for the identification of low molecular weight sensitizing chemicals. It provides several benefits over other tests for sensitization because it provides a quantitative endpoint, dose-responsive data, and allows for prediction of potency. However, there are also several concerns with this assay including: levels of false positive responses, variability due to vehicle, and predictivity. This report serves as a concise review which briefly summarizes the progress, advances and limitations of the assay over the last decade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3124934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31249342011-07-11 The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations Anderson, Stacey E. Siegel, Paul D. Meade, B. J. J Allergy (Cairo) Review Article Allergic contact dermatitis is the second most commonly reported occupational illness, accounting for 10% to 15% of all occupational diseases. This highlights the importance of developing rapid and sensitive methods for hazard identification of chemical sensitizers. The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was developed and validated for the identification of low molecular weight sensitizing chemicals. It provides several benefits over other tests for sensitization because it provides a quantitative endpoint, dose-responsive data, and allows for prediction of potency. However, there are also several concerns with this assay including: levels of false positive responses, variability due to vehicle, and predictivity. This report serves as a concise review which briefly summarizes the progress, advances and limitations of the assay over the last decade. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3124934/ /pubmed/21747867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/424203 Text en Copyright © 2011 Stacey E. Anderson et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Anderson, Stacey E.
Siegel, Paul D.
Meade, B. J.
The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
title The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
title_full The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
title_fullStr The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
title_full_unstemmed The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
title_short The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations
title_sort llna: a brief review of recent advances and limitations
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3124934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/424203
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonstaceye thellnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations
AT siegelpauld thellnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations
AT meadebj thellnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations
AT andersonstaceye llnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations
AT siegelpauld llnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations
AT meadebj llnaabriefreviewofrecentadvancesandlimitations