Cargando…

Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings

BACKGROUND: Metal oxides in nanoparticle form such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide now appear on the ingredient lists of household products as common and diverse as cosmetics, sunscreens, toothpaste, and medicine. Previous studies of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide in non-nanoparticle format usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Julia X, Li, Thomas H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-1-19
_version_ 1782207180906168320
author Yu, Julia X
Li, Thomas H
author_facet Yu, Julia X
Li, Thomas H
author_sort Yu, Julia X
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metal oxides in nanoparticle form such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide now appear on the ingredient lists of household products as common and diverse as cosmetics, sunscreens, toothpaste, and medicine. Previous studies of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide in non-nanoparticle format using animals have found few adverse effects. This has led the FDA to classify zinc oxide as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) for use as a food additive. However, there is no regulation specific for the use of these chemicals in nanoparticle format. Recent studies, however, have begun to raise concerns over the pervasive use of these compounds in nanoparticle forms. Unfortunately, there is a lack of easily-adaptable screening methods that would allow for the detection of their biological effects. RESULTS: We adapted two image-based assays, a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based caspase activation assay and a green fluorescent protein coupled-LC3 assay, to test for the biological effects of different nanoparticles in a high-throughput format. We show that zinc oxide nanoparticles are cytotoxic. We also show that titanium dioxide nanoparticles are highly effective in inducing autophagy, a cellular disposal mechanism that is often activated when the cell is under stress. CONCLUSION: We suggest that these image-based assays provide a method of screening for the biological effects of similar compounds that is both efficient and sensitive as well as do not involve the use of animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3125209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31252092011-06-29 Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings Yu, Julia X Li, Thomas H Cell Biosci Research BACKGROUND: Metal oxides in nanoparticle form such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide now appear on the ingredient lists of household products as common and diverse as cosmetics, sunscreens, toothpaste, and medicine. Previous studies of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide in non-nanoparticle format using animals have found few adverse effects. This has led the FDA to classify zinc oxide as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) for use as a food additive. However, there is no regulation specific for the use of these chemicals in nanoparticle format. Recent studies, however, have begun to raise concerns over the pervasive use of these compounds in nanoparticle forms. Unfortunately, there is a lack of easily-adaptable screening methods that would allow for the detection of their biological effects. RESULTS: We adapted two image-based assays, a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based caspase activation assay and a green fluorescent protein coupled-LC3 assay, to test for the biological effects of different nanoparticles in a high-throughput format. We show that zinc oxide nanoparticles are cytotoxic. We also show that titanium dioxide nanoparticles are highly effective in inducing autophagy, a cellular disposal mechanism that is often activated when the cell is under stress. CONCLUSION: We suggest that these image-based assays provide a method of screening for the biological effects of similar compounds that is both efficient and sensitive as well as do not involve the use of animals. BioMed Central 2011-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3125209/ /pubmed/21711940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-1-19 Text en Copyright ©2011 Yu and Li; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Yu, Julia X
Li, Thomas H
Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
title Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
title_full Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
title_fullStr Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
title_full_unstemmed Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
title_short Distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
title_sort distinct biological effects of different nanoparticles commonly used in cosmetics and medicine coatings
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3701-1-19
work_keys_str_mv AT yujuliax distinctbiologicaleffectsofdifferentnanoparticlescommonlyusedincosmeticsandmedicinecoatings
AT lithomash distinctbiologicaleffectsofdifferentnanoparticlescommonlyusedincosmeticsandmedicinecoatings