Cargando…
A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the interfragmentary compression force across a simulated scaphoid fracture by two commonly used compression screw systems; the Acutrak 2 Standard and the 3.0 mm Synthes headless compression screw. METHODS: Sixteen (8 pairs; 6 female, 2 male) cadaver...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21645410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-27 |
_version_ | 1782207220733181952 |
---|---|
author | Grewal, Ruby Assini, Joseph Sauder, David Ferreira, Louis Johnson, Jim Faber, Kenneth |
author_facet | Grewal, Ruby Assini, Joseph Sauder, David Ferreira, Louis Johnson, Jim Faber, Kenneth |
author_sort | Grewal, Ruby |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the interfragmentary compression force across a simulated scaphoid fracture by two commonly used compression screw systems; the Acutrak 2 Standard and the 3.0 mm Synthes headless compression screw. METHODS: Sixteen (8 pairs; 6 female, 2 male) cadaver scaphoids were randomly assigned to receive either the Acutrak 2 or Synthes screw with the contralateral scaphoid designated to receive the opposite. Guide wires were inserted under fluoroscopic control. Following transverse osteotomy, the distal and proximal fragments were placed on either side of a custom load cell, to measure interfragmentary compression. Screws were placed under fluoroscopic control using the manufacturer's recommended surgical technique. Compressive forces were measured during screw insertion. Recording continued for an additional 60s in order to measure any loss of compression after installation was complete. The peak and final interfragmentary compression were recorded and paired t-tests performed. RESULTS: The mean peak compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was greater than that produced by the Synthes compression screw (103.9 ± 33.2 N vs. 88.7 ± 38.6 N respectively, p = 0.13). The mean final interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 screw (68.6 ± 36.4 N) was significantly greater (p = 0.04) than the Synthes screw (37.2 ± 26.8 N). Specimens typically reached a steady state of compression by 120-150s after final tightening. CONCLUSION: Peak interfragmentary compression observed during screw installation was similar for both screw systems. However, the mean interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was significantly greater. Our study demonstrates that the Synthes headless compression screw experienced a greater loss of interfragmentary compressive force from the time of installation to the final steady state compression level. The higher post-installation compression of the Acutrak 2 Standard may be attributable to the greater number of threads throughout the entire length of the screw. The clinical significance of these results, are, at this point uncertain. We do demonstrate that a fully threaded design offers a more reliable compression that may translate to more predictable bony union. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3125384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31253842011-06-29 A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures Grewal, Ruby Assini, Joseph Sauder, David Ferreira, Louis Johnson, Jim Faber, Kenneth J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the interfragmentary compression force across a simulated scaphoid fracture by two commonly used compression screw systems; the Acutrak 2 Standard and the 3.0 mm Synthes headless compression screw. METHODS: Sixteen (8 pairs; 6 female, 2 male) cadaver scaphoids were randomly assigned to receive either the Acutrak 2 or Synthes screw with the contralateral scaphoid designated to receive the opposite. Guide wires were inserted under fluoroscopic control. Following transverse osteotomy, the distal and proximal fragments were placed on either side of a custom load cell, to measure interfragmentary compression. Screws were placed under fluoroscopic control using the manufacturer's recommended surgical technique. Compressive forces were measured during screw insertion. Recording continued for an additional 60s in order to measure any loss of compression after installation was complete. The peak and final interfragmentary compression were recorded and paired t-tests performed. RESULTS: The mean peak compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was greater than that produced by the Synthes compression screw (103.9 ± 33.2 N vs. 88.7 ± 38.6 N respectively, p = 0.13). The mean final interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 screw (68.6 ± 36.4 N) was significantly greater (p = 0.04) than the Synthes screw (37.2 ± 26.8 N). Specimens typically reached a steady state of compression by 120-150s after final tightening. CONCLUSION: Peak interfragmentary compression observed during screw installation was similar for both screw systems. However, the mean interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was significantly greater. Our study demonstrates that the Synthes headless compression screw experienced a greater loss of interfragmentary compressive force from the time of installation to the final steady state compression level. The higher post-installation compression of the Acutrak 2 Standard may be attributable to the greater number of threads throughout the entire length of the screw. The clinical significance of these results, are, at this point uncertain. We do demonstrate that a fully threaded design offers a more reliable compression that may translate to more predictable bony union. BioMed Central 2011-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3125384/ /pubmed/21645410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-27 Text en Copyright ©2011 Grewal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grewal, Ruby Assini, Joseph Sauder, David Ferreira, Louis Johnson, Jim Faber, Kenneth A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
title | A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
title_full | A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
title_fullStr | A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
title_short | A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
title_sort | comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21645410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grewalruby acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT assinijoseph acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT sauderdavid acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT ferreiralouis acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT johnsonjim acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT faberkenneth acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT grewalruby comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT assinijoseph comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT sauderdavid comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT ferreiralouis comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT johnsonjim comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures AT faberkenneth comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures |