Cargando…

A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the interfragmentary compression force across a simulated scaphoid fracture by two commonly used compression screw systems; the Acutrak 2 Standard and the 3.0 mm Synthes headless compression screw. METHODS: Sixteen (8 pairs; 6 female, 2 male) cadaver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grewal, Ruby, Assini, Joseph, Sauder, David, Ferreira, Louis, Johnson, Jim, Faber, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21645410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-27
_version_ 1782207220733181952
author Grewal, Ruby
Assini, Joseph
Sauder, David
Ferreira, Louis
Johnson, Jim
Faber, Kenneth
author_facet Grewal, Ruby
Assini, Joseph
Sauder, David
Ferreira, Louis
Johnson, Jim
Faber, Kenneth
author_sort Grewal, Ruby
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the interfragmentary compression force across a simulated scaphoid fracture by two commonly used compression screw systems; the Acutrak 2 Standard and the 3.0 mm Synthes headless compression screw. METHODS: Sixteen (8 pairs; 6 female, 2 male) cadaver scaphoids were randomly assigned to receive either the Acutrak 2 or Synthes screw with the contralateral scaphoid designated to receive the opposite. Guide wires were inserted under fluoroscopic control. Following transverse osteotomy, the distal and proximal fragments were placed on either side of a custom load cell, to measure interfragmentary compression. Screws were placed under fluoroscopic control using the manufacturer's recommended surgical technique. Compressive forces were measured during screw insertion. Recording continued for an additional 60s in order to measure any loss of compression after installation was complete. The peak and final interfragmentary compression were recorded and paired t-tests performed. RESULTS: The mean peak compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was greater than that produced by the Synthes compression screw (103.9 ± 33.2 N vs. 88.7 ± 38.6 N respectively, p = 0.13). The mean final interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 screw (68.6 ± 36.4 N) was significantly greater (p = 0.04) than the Synthes screw (37.2 ± 26.8 N). Specimens typically reached a steady state of compression by 120-150s after final tightening. CONCLUSION: Peak interfragmentary compression observed during screw installation was similar for both screw systems. However, the mean interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was significantly greater. Our study demonstrates that the Synthes headless compression screw experienced a greater loss of interfragmentary compressive force from the time of installation to the final steady state compression level. The higher post-installation compression of the Acutrak 2 Standard may be attributable to the greater number of threads throughout the entire length of the screw. The clinical significance of these results, are, at this point uncertain. We do demonstrate that a fully threaded design offers a more reliable compression that may translate to more predictable bony union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3125384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31253842011-06-29 A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures Grewal, Ruby Assini, Joseph Sauder, David Ferreira, Louis Johnson, Jim Faber, Kenneth J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the interfragmentary compression force across a simulated scaphoid fracture by two commonly used compression screw systems; the Acutrak 2 Standard and the 3.0 mm Synthes headless compression screw. METHODS: Sixteen (8 pairs; 6 female, 2 male) cadaver scaphoids were randomly assigned to receive either the Acutrak 2 or Synthes screw with the contralateral scaphoid designated to receive the opposite. Guide wires were inserted under fluoroscopic control. Following transverse osteotomy, the distal and proximal fragments were placed on either side of a custom load cell, to measure interfragmentary compression. Screws were placed under fluoroscopic control using the manufacturer's recommended surgical technique. Compressive forces were measured during screw insertion. Recording continued for an additional 60s in order to measure any loss of compression after installation was complete. The peak and final interfragmentary compression were recorded and paired t-tests performed. RESULTS: The mean peak compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was greater than that produced by the Synthes compression screw (103.9 ± 33.2 N vs. 88.7 ± 38.6 N respectively, p = 0.13). The mean final interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 screw (68.6 ± 36.4 N) was significantly greater (p = 0.04) than the Synthes screw (37.2 ± 26.8 N). Specimens typically reached a steady state of compression by 120-150s after final tightening. CONCLUSION: Peak interfragmentary compression observed during screw installation was similar for both screw systems. However, the mean interfragmentary compression generated by the Acutrak 2 Standard was significantly greater. Our study demonstrates that the Synthes headless compression screw experienced a greater loss of interfragmentary compressive force from the time of installation to the final steady state compression level. The higher post-installation compression of the Acutrak 2 Standard may be attributable to the greater number of threads throughout the entire length of the screw. The clinical significance of these results, are, at this point uncertain. We do demonstrate that a fully threaded design offers a more reliable compression that may translate to more predictable bony union. BioMed Central 2011-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3125384/ /pubmed/21645410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-27 Text en Copyright ©2011 Grewal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grewal, Ruby
Assini, Joseph
Sauder, David
Ferreira, Louis
Johnson, Jim
Faber, Kenneth
A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
title A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
title_full A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
title_fullStr A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
title_short A comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
title_sort comparison of two headless compression screws for operative treatment of scaphoid fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21645410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-27
work_keys_str_mv AT grewalruby acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT assinijoseph acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT sauderdavid acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT ferreiralouis acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT johnsonjim acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT faberkenneth acomparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT grewalruby comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT assinijoseph comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT sauderdavid comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT ferreiralouis comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT johnsonjim comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures
AT faberkenneth comparisonoftwoheadlesscompressionscrewsforoperativetreatmentofscaphoidfractures