Cargando…

The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients

BACKGROUND: The Charlson comorbidity index is often used to control for confounding in research based on medical databases. There are few studies of the accuracy of the codes obtained from these databases. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10 diagnostic coding in the Danish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thygesen, Sandra K, Christiansen, Christian F, Christensen, Steffen, Lash, Timothy L, Sørensen, Henrik T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-83
_version_ 1782207221658025984
author Thygesen, Sandra K
Christiansen, Christian F
Christensen, Steffen
Lash, Timothy L
Sørensen, Henrik T
author_facet Thygesen, Sandra K
Christiansen, Christian F
Christensen, Steffen
Lash, Timothy L
Sørensen, Henrik T
author_sort Thygesen, Sandra K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Charlson comorbidity index is often used to control for confounding in research based on medical databases. There are few studies of the accuracy of the codes obtained from these databases. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10 diagnostic coding in the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP) for the 19 Charlson conditions. METHODS: Among all hospitalizations in Northern Denmark between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007 with a first-listed diagnosis of a Charlson condition in the NRP, we selected 50 hospital contacts for each condition. We reviewed discharge summaries and medical records to verify the NRP diagnoses, and computed the PPV as the proportion of confirmed diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 950 records were reviewed. The overall PPV for the 19 Charlson conditions was 98.0% (95% CI; 96.9, 98.8). The PPVs ranged from 82.0% (95% CI; 68.6%, 91.4%) for diabetes with diabetic complications to 100% (one-sided 97.5% CI; 92.9%, 100%) for congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, mild and severe liver disease, hemiplegia, renal disease, leukaemia, lymphoma, metastatic tumour, and AIDS. CONCLUSION: The PPV of NRP coding of the Charlson conditions was consistently high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3125388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31253882011-06-29 The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients Thygesen, Sandra K Christiansen, Christian F Christensen, Steffen Lash, Timothy L Sørensen, Henrik T BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Charlson comorbidity index is often used to control for confounding in research based on medical databases. There are few studies of the accuracy of the codes obtained from these databases. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10 diagnostic coding in the Danish National Registry of Patients (NRP) for the 19 Charlson conditions. METHODS: Among all hospitalizations in Northern Denmark between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007 with a first-listed diagnosis of a Charlson condition in the NRP, we selected 50 hospital contacts for each condition. We reviewed discharge summaries and medical records to verify the NRP diagnoses, and computed the PPV as the proportion of confirmed diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 950 records were reviewed. The overall PPV for the 19 Charlson conditions was 98.0% (95% CI; 96.9, 98.8). The PPVs ranged from 82.0% (95% CI; 68.6%, 91.4%) for diabetes with diabetic complications to 100% (one-sided 97.5% CI; 92.9%, 100%) for congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, mild and severe liver disease, hemiplegia, renal disease, leukaemia, lymphoma, metastatic tumour, and AIDS. CONCLUSION: The PPV of NRP coding of the Charlson conditions was consistently high. BioMed Central 2011-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3125388/ /pubmed/21619668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-83 Text en Copyright ©2011 Thygesen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thygesen, Sandra K
Christiansen, Christian F
Christensen, Steffen
Lash, Timothy L
Sørensen, Henrik T
The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
title The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
title_full The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
title_fullStr The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
title_full_unstemmed The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
title_short The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
title_sort predictive value of icd-10 diagnostic coding used to assess charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based danish national registry of patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3125388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21619668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-83
work_keys_str_mv AT thygesensandrak thepredictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT christiansenchristianf thepredictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT christensensteffen thepredictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT lashtimothyl thepredictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT sørensenhenrikt thepredictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT thygesensandrak predictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT christiansenchristianf predictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT christensensteffen predictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT lashtimothyl predictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients
AT sørensenhenrikt predictivevalueoficd10diagnosticcodingusedtoassesscharlsoncomorbidityindexconditionsinthepopulationbaseddanishnationalregistryofpatients