Cargando…
Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
We have developed poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based composites using sol–gel derived bioactive glasses (S-BG), previously described by our group, as composite components. Two different composite types were manufactured that contained either S2—high content silica S-BG, or A2—high content lim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21487840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4 |
_version_ | 1782207318260187136 |
---|---|
author | Pamula, Elzbieta Kokoszka, Justyna Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna Laczka, Maria Kantor, Lukasz Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz Reilly, Gwendolen C. Filipowska, Joanna Madej, Wojciech Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata Tylko, Grzegorz Osyczka, Anna M. |
author_facet | Pamula, Elzbieta Kokoszka, Justyna Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna Laczka, Maria Kantor, Lukasz Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz Reilly, Gwendolen C. Filipowska, Joanna Madej, Wojciech Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata Tylko, Grzegorz Osyczka, Anna M. |
author_sort | Pamula, Elzbieta |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have developed poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based composites using sol–gel derived bioactive glasses (S-BG), previously described by our group, as composite components. Two different composite types were manufactured that contained either S2—high content silica S-BG, or A2—high content lime S-BG. The composites were evaluated in the form of sheets and 3D scaffolds. Sheets containing 12, 21, and 33 vol.% of each bioactive glass were characterized for mechanical properties, wettability, hydrolytic degradation, and surface bioactivity. Sheets containing A2 S-BG rapidly formed a hydroxyapatite surface layer after incubation in simulated body fluid. The incorporation of either S-BG increased the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the composites and tailored their degradation rates compared to starting compounds. Sheets and 3D scaffolds were evaluated for their ability to support growth of human bone marrow cells (BMC) and MG-63 cells, respectively. Cells were grown in non-differentiating, osteogenic or osteoclast-inducing conditions. Osteogenesis was induced with either recombinant human BMP-2 or dexamethasone, and osteoclast formation with M-CSF. BMC viability was lower at higher S-BG content, though specific ALP/cell was significantly higher on PLGA/A2-33 composites. Composites containing S2 S-BG enhanced calcification of extracellular matrix by BMC, whereas incorporation of A2 S-BG in the composites promoted osteoclast formation from BMC. MG-63 osteoblast-like cells seeded in porous scaffolds containing S2 maintained viability and secreted collagen and calcium throughout the scaffolds. Overall, the presented data show functional versatility of the composites studied and indicate their potential to design a wide variety of implant materials differing in physico-chemical properties and biological applications. We propose these sol–gel derived bioactive glass–PLGA composites may prove excellent potential orthopedic and dental biomaterials supporting bone formation and remodeling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3127015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31270152011-08-09 Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses Pamula, Elzbieta Kokoszka, Justyna Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna Laczka, Maria Kantor, Lukasz Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz Reilly, Gwendolen C. Filipowska, Joanna Madej, Wojciech Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata Tylko, Grzegorz Osyczka, Anna M. Ann Biomed Eng Article We have developed poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based composites using sol–gel derived bioactive glasses (S-BG), previously described by our group, as composite components. Two different composite types were manufactured that contained either S2—high content silica S-BG, or A2—high content lime S-BG. The composites were evaluated in the form of sheets and 3D scaffolds. Sheets containing 12, 21, and 33 vol.% of each bioactive glass were characterized for mechanical properties, wettability, hydrolytic degradation, and surface bioactivity. Sheets containing A2 S-BG rapidly formed a hydroxyapatite surface layer after incubation in simulated body fluid. The incorporation of either S-BG increased the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the composites and tailored their degradation rates compared to starting compounds. Sheets and 3D scaffolds were evaluated for their ability to support growth of human bone marrow cells (BMC) and MG-63 cells, respectively. Cells were grown in non-differentiating, osteogenic or osteoclast-inducing conditions. Osteogenesis was induced with either recombinant human BMP-2 or dexamethasone, and osteoclast formation with M-CSF. BMC viability was lower at higher S-BG content, though specific ALP/cell was significantly higher on PLGA/A2-33 composites. Composites containing S2 S-BG enhanced calcification of extracellular matrix by BMC, whereas incorporation of A2 S-BG in the composites promoted osteoclast formation from BMC. MG-63 osteoblast-like cells seeded in porous scaffolds containing S2 maintained viability and secreted collagen and calcium throughout the scaffolds. Overall, the presented data show functional versatility of the composites studied and indicate their potential to design a wide variety of implant materials differing in physico-chemical properties and biological applications. We propose these sol–gel derived bioactive glass–PLGA composites may prove excellent potential orthopedic and dental biomaterials supporting bone formation and remodeling. Springer US 2011-04-13 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3127015/ /pubmed/21487840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Pamula, Elzbieta Kokoszka, Justyna Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna Laczka, Maria Kantor, Lukasz Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz Reilly, Gwendolen C. Filipowska, Joanna Madej, Wojciech Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata Tylko, Grzegorz Osyczka, Anna M. Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses |
title | Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses |
title_full | Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses |
title_fullStr | Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses |
title_full_unstemmed | Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses |
title_short | Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses |
title_sort | degradation, bioactivity, and osteogenic potential of composites made of plga and two different sol–gel bioactive glasses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21487840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pamulaelzbieta degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT kokoszkajustyna degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT cholewakowalskakatarzyna degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT laczkamaria degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT kantorlukasz degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT niedzwiedzkilukasz degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT reillygwendolenc degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT filipowskajoanna degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT madejwojciech degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT kolodziejczykmalgorzata degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT tylkogrzegorz degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses AT osyczkaannam degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses |