Cargando…

Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses

We have developed poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based composites using sol–gel derived bioactive glasses (S-BG), previously described by our group, as composite components. Two different composite types were manufactured that contained either S2—high content silica S-BG, or A2—high content lim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pamula, Elzbieta, Kokoszka, Justyna, Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna, Laczka, Maria, Kantor, Lukasz, Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz, Reilly, Gwendolen C., Filipowska, Joanna, Madej, Wojciech, Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata, Tylko, Grzegorz, Osyczka, Anna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21487840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4
_version_ 1782207318260187136
author Pamula, Elzbieta
Kokoszka, Justyna
Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna
Laczka, Maria
Kantor, Lukasz
Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz
Reilly, Gwendolen C.
Filipowska, Joanna
Madej, Wojciech
Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata
Tylko, Grzegorz
Osyczka, Anna M.
author_facet Pamula, Elzbieta
Kokoszka, Justyna
Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna
Laczka, Maria
Kantor, Lukasz
Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz
Reilly, Gwendolen C.
Filipowska, Joanna
Madej, Wojciech
Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata
Tylko, Grzegorz
Osyczka, Anna M.
author_sort Pamula, Elzbieta
collection PubMed
description We have developed poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based composites using sol–gel derived bioactive glasses (S-BG), previously described by our group, as composite components. Two different composite types were manufactured that contained either S2—high content silica S-BG, or A2—high content lime S-BG. The composites were evaluated in the form of sheets and 3D scaffolds. Sheets containing 12, 21, and 33 vol.% of each bioactive glass were characterized for mechanical properties, wettability, hydrolytic degradation, and surface bioactivity. Sheets containing A2 S-BG rapidly formed a hydroxyapatite surface layer after incubation in simulated body fluid. The incorporation of either S-BG increased the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the composites and tailored their degradation rates compared to starting compounds. Sheets and 3D scaffolds were evaluated for their ability to support growth of human bone marrow cells (BMC) and MG-63 cells, respectively. Cells were grown in non-differentiating, osteogenic or osteoclast-inducing conditions. Osteogenesis was induced with either recombinant human BMP-2 or dexamethasone, and osteoclast formation with M-CSF. BMC viability was lower at higher S-BG content, though specific ALP/cell was significantly higher on PLGA/A2-33 composites. Composites containing S2 S-BG enhanced calcification of extracellular matrix by BMC, whereas incorporation of A2 S-BG in the composites promoted osteoclast formation from BMC. MG-63 osteoblast-like cells seeded in porous scaffolds containing S2 maintained viability and secreted collagen and calcium throughout the scaffolds. Overall, the presented data show functional versatility of the composites studied and indicate their potential to design a wide variety of implant materials differing in physico-chemical properties and biological applications. We propose these sol–gel derived bioactive glass–PLGA composites may prove excellent potential orthopedic and dental biomaterials supporting bone formation and remodeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3127015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31270152011-08-09 Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses Pamula, Elzbieta Kokoszka, Justyna Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna Laczka, Maria Kantor, Lukasz Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz Reilly, Gwendolen C. Filipowska, Joanna Madej, Wojciech Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata Tylko, Grzegorz Osyczka, Anna M. Ann Biomed Eng Article We have developed poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based composites using sol–gel derived bioactive glasses (S-BG), previously described by our group, as composite components. Two different composite types were manufactured that contained either S2—high content silica S-BG, or A2—high content lime S-BG. The composites were evaluated in the form of sheets and 3D scaffolds. Sheets containing 12, 21, and 33 vol.% of each bioactive glass were characterized for mechanical properties, wettability, hydrolytic degradation, and surface bioactivity. Sheets containing A2 S-BG rapidly formed a hydroxyapatite surface layer after incubation in simulated body fluid. The incorporation of either S-BG increased the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of the composites and tailored their degradation rates compared to starting compounds. Sheets and 3D scaffolds were evaluated for their ability to support growth of human bone marrow cells (BMC) and MG-63 cells, respectively. Cells were grown in non-differentiating, osteogenic or osteoclast-inducing conditions. Osteogenesis was induced with either recombinant human BMP-2 or dexamethasone, and osteoclast formation with M-CSF. BMC viability was lower at higher S-BG content, though specific ALP/cell was significantly higher on PLGA/A2-33 composites. Composites containing S2 S-BG enhanced calcification of extracellular matrix by BMC, whereas incorporation of A2 S-BG in the composites promoted osteoclast formation from BMC. MG-63 osteoblast-like cells seeded in porous scaffolds containing S2 maintained viability and secreted collagen and calcium throughout the scaffolds. Overall, the presented data show functional versatility of the composites studied and indicate their potential to design a wide variety of implant materials differing in physico-chemical properties and biological applications. We propose these sol–gel derived bioactive glass–PLGA composites may prove excellent potential orthopedic and dental biomaterials supporting bone formation and remodeling. Springer US 2011-04-13 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3127015/ /pubmed/21487840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Pamula, Elzbieta
Kokoszka, Justyna
Cholewa-Kowalska, Katarzyna
Laczka, Maria
Kantor, Lukasz
Niedzwiedzki, Lukasz
Reilly, Gwendolen C.
Filipowska, Joanna
Madej, Wojciech
Kolodziejczyk, Malgorzata
Tylko, Grzegorz
Osyczka, Anna M.
Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
title Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
title_full Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
title_fullStr Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
title_full_unstemmed Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
title_short Degradation, Bioactivity, and Osteogenic Potential of Composites Made of PLGA and Two Different Sol–Gel Bioactive Glasses
title_sort degradation, bioactivity, and osteogenic potential of composites made of plga and two different sol–gel bioactive glasses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21487840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pamulaelzbieta degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT kokoszkajustyna degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT cholewakowalskakatarzyna degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT laczkamaria degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT kantorlukasz degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT niedzwiedzkilukasz degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT reillygwendolenc degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT filipowskajoanna degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT madejwojciech degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT kolodziejczykmalgorzata degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT tylkogrzegorz degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses
AT osyczkaannam degradationbioactivityandosteogenicpotentialofcompositesmadeofplgaandtwodifferentsolgelbioactiveglasses