Cargando…
Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work
BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between leisure and commuter cycling with objectively measured levels of road traffic and whether any relationship was affected by traffic levels directly outside of home or in local neighbourhood. FINDINGS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the U...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21663654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-61 |
_version_ | 1782207393960034304 |
---|---|
author | Foster, Charlie E Panter, Jenna R Wareham, Nicholas J |
author_facet | Foster, Charlie E Panter, Jenna R Wareham, Nicholas J |
author_sort | Foster, Charlie E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between leisure and commuter cycling with objectively measured levels of road traffic and whether any relationship was affected by traffic levels directly outside of home or in local neighbourhood. FINDINGS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the UK European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) Norfolk cohort in 2009. We used a geographical information system (GIS) and gender specific multivariate models to relate 13 927 participants' reported levels of cycling with an index of road traffic volume (Road Traffic Volume Index Score - RTVIS). RTVIS were calculated around each participants home, using four distance based buffers, (0.5 km, 1 km, 2 km and 3.2 km). Models were adjusted for age, social status, education, car access and deprivation. Both genders had similar decreases in leisure cycling as traffic volumes increased at greater distances from home (OR 0.42, (95% CI 0.32-0.52, p < 0.001) for women and OR 0.41, (95% CI 0.33-0.50, p < 0.001) for men in the highest quartile at 3.2 km). There was no effect of traffic volumes at any distance on commuter cycling. CONCLUSIONS: Traffic volumes appear to have greater impact on leisure cycling than commuter cycling. Future research should investigate the importance of traffic on different types of cycling and include psychosocial correlates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3127970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31279702011-07-01 Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work Foster, Charlie E Panter, Jenna R Wareham, Nicholas J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Short Paper BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between leisure and commuter cycling with objectively measured levels of road traffic and whether any relationship was affected by traffic levels directly outside of home or in local neighbourhood. FINDINGS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the UK European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) Norfolk cohort in 2009. We used a geographical information system (GIS) and gender specific multivariate models to relate 13 927 participants' reported levels of cycling with an index of road traffic volume (Road Traffic Volume Index Score - RTVIS). RTVIS were calculated around each participants home, using four distance based buffers, (0.5 km, 1 km, 2 km and 3.2 km). Models were adjusted for age, social status, education, car access and deprivation. Both genders had similar decreases in leisure cycling as traffic volumes increased at greater distances from home (OR 0.42, (95% CI 0.32-0.52, p < 0.001) for women and OR 0.41, (95% CI 0.33-0.50, p < 0.001) for men in the highest quartile at 3.2 km). There was no effect of traffic volumes at any distance on commuter cycling. CONCLUSIONS: Traffic volumes appear to have greater impact on leisure cycling than commuter cycling. Future research should investigate the importance of traffic on different types of cycling and include psychosocial correlates. BioMed Central 2011-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3127970/ /pubmed/21663654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-61 Text en Copyright ©2011 Foster et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Paper Foster, Charlie E Panter, Jenna R Wareham, Nicholas J Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
title | Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
title_full | Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
title_fullStr | Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
title_short | Assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
title_sort | assessing the impact of road traffic on cycling for leisure and cycling to work |
topic | Short Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3127970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21663654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-61 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fostercharliee assessingtheimpactofroadtrafficoncyclingforleisureandcyclingtowork AT panterjennar assessingtheimpactofroadtrafficoncyclingforleisureandcyclingtowork AT warehamnicholasj assessingtheimpactofroadtrafficoncyclingforleisureandcyclingtowork |