Cargando…
Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies
PURPOSE: We assessed test–retest variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O positron emission tomography (PET) scans. PROCEDURES: In seven healthy vol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0382-1 |
_version_ | 1782207434785292288 |
---|---|
author | Bremmer, Jochem P. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Persoon, Suzanne Kappelle, L. Jaap Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Kloet, Reina Luurtsema, Gert Rijbroek, Abraham Klijn, Catharina J. M. Boellaard, Ronald |
author_facet | Bremmer, Jochem P. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Persoon, Suzanne Kappelle, L. Jaap Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Kloet, Reina Luurtsema, Gert Rijbroek, Abraham Klijn, Catharina J. M. Boellaard, Ronald |
author_sort | Bremmer, Jochem P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We assessed test–retest variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O positron emission tomography (PET) scans. PROCEDURES: In seven healthy volunteers, complete test–retest (15)O PET studies were obtained; test–retest variability and left-to-right ratios of CBF, CBV, OEF, and CMRO(2) in arterial flow territories were calculated. RESULTS: Whole-brain test–retest coefficients of variation for CBF, CBV, CMRO(2), and OEF were 8.8%, 13.8%, 5.3%, and 9.3%, respectively. Test–retest variability of CBV left-to-right ratios was <7.4% across all territories. Corresponding values for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF were better, i.e., <4.5%, <4.0%, and <1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test–retest variability of CMRO(2) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O PET scans is comparable to within-session test–retest variability derived from steady-state (15)O PET scans. Excellent regional test–retest variability was observed for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF. Variability of absolute CBF and OEF measurements is probably affected by physiological day-to-day variability of CBF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3128261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31282612011-08-10 Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies Bremmer, Jochem P. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Persoon, Suzanne Kappelle, L. Jaap Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Kloet, Reina Luurtsema, Gert Rijbroek, Abraham Klijn, Catharina J. M. Boellaard, Ronald Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: We assessed test–retest variability of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O positron emission tomography (PET) scans. PROCEDURES: In seven healthy volunteers, complete test–retest (15)O PET studies were obtained; test–retest variability and left-to-right ratios of CBF, CBV, OEF, and CMRO(2) in arterial flow territories were calculated. RESULTS: Whole-brain test–retest coefficients of variation for CBF, CBV, CMRO(2), and OEF were 8.8%, 13.8%, 5.3%, and 9.3%, respectively. Test–retest variability of CBV left-to-right ratios was <7.4% across all territories. Corresponding values for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF were better, i.e., <4.5%, <4.0%, and <1.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The test–retest variability of CMRO(2) measurements derived from dynamic (15)O PET scans is comparable to within-session test–retest variability derived from steady-state (15)O PET scans. Excellent regional test–retest variability was observed for CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF. Variability of absolute CBF and OEF measurements is probably affected by physiological day-to-day variability of CBF. Springer-Verlag 2010-08-11 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3128261/ /pubmed/20700768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0382-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bremmer, Jochem P. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Persoon, Suzanne Kappelle, L. Jaap Lammertsma, Adriaan A. Kloet, Reina Luurtsema, Gert Rijbroek, Abraham Klijn, Catharina J. M. Boellaard, Ronald Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies |
title | Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies |
title_full | Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies |
title_fullStr | Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies |
title_short | Day-to-Day Test–Retest Variability of CBF, CMRO(2), and OEF Measurements Using Dynamic (15)O PET Studies |
title_sort | day-to-day test–retest variability of cbf, cmro(2), and oef measurements using dynamic (15)o pet studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20700768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0382-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bremmerjochemp daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT vanberckelbartnm daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT persoonsuzanne daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT kappelleljaap daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT lammertsmaadriaana daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT kloetreina daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT luurtsemagert daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT rijbroekabraham daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT klijncatharinajm daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies AT boellaardronald daytodaytestretestvariabilityofcbfcmro2andoefmeasurementsusingdynamic15opetstudies |