Cargando…

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials

INTRODUCTION: Intervertebral spacers are made of different materials, which can affect the postfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Susceptibility artifacts, especially for metallic implants, can decrease the image quality. This study aimed to determine whether magnesium as a lightweight a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernstberger, T., Buchhorn, G., Heidrich, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19693644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0394-5
_version_ 1782207473955897344
author Ernstberger, T.
Buchhorn, G.
Heidrich, G.
author_facet Ernstberger, T.
Buchhorn, G.
Heidrich, G.
author_sort Ernstberger, T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intervertebral spacers are made of different materials, which can affect the postfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Susceptibility artifacts, especially for metallic implants, can decrease the image quality. This study aimed to determine whether magnesium as a lightweight and biocompatible metal is suitable as a biomaterial for spinal implants based on its MRI artifacting behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare artifacting behaviors, we implanted into one porcine cadaveric spine different test spacers made of magnesium, titanium, and CFRP. All test spacers were scanned using two T1-TSE MRI sequences. The artifact dimensions were traced on all scans and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The total artifact volume and median artifact area of the titanium spacers were statistically significantly larger than magnesium spacers (P < 0.001), while magnesium and CFRP spacers produced almost identical artifacting behaviors (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that spinal implants made with magnesium alloys will behave more like CFRP devices in MRI scans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3128752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31287522011-08-10 RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials Ernstberger, T. Buchhorn, G. Heidrich, G. Ir J Med Sci Retraction INTRODUCTION: Intervertebral spacers are made of different materials, which can affect the postfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Susceptibility artifacts, especially for metallic implants, can decrease the image quality. This study aimed to determine whether magnesium as a lightweight and biocompatible metal is suitable as a biomaterial for spinal implants based on its MRI artifacting behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare artifacting behaviors, we implanted into one porcine cadaveric spine different test spacers made of magnesium, titanium, and CFRP. All test spacers were scanned using two T1-TSE MRI sequences. The artifact dimensions were traced on all scans and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The total artifact volume and median artifact area of the titanium spacers were statistically significantly larger than magnesium spacers (P < 0.001), while magnesium and CFRP spacers produced almost identical artifacting behaviors (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that spinal implants made with magnesium alloys will behave more like CFRP devices in MRI scans. Springer-Verlag 2009-08-20 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3128752/ /pubmed/19693644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0394-5 Text en © Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2009
spellingShingle Retraction
Ernstberger, T.
Buchhorn, G.
Heidrich, G.
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
title RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
title_full RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
title_fullStr RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
title_full_unstemmed RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
title_short RETRACTED ARTICLE: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
title_sort retracted article: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials
topic Retraction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3128752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19693644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0394-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ernstbergert retractedarticlemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofintervertebraltestspacersanexperimentalcomparisonofmagnesiumversustitaniumandcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersasbiomaterials
AT buchhorng retractedarticlemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofintervertebraltestspacersanexperimentalcomparisonofmagnesiumversustitaniumandcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersasbiomaterials
AT heidrichg retractedarticlemagneticresonanceimagingevaluationofintervertebraltestspacersanexperimentalcomparisonofmagnesiumversustitaniumandcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersasbiomaterials