Cargando…

Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock

We have reviewed the current pig (Sus scrofa) genomic diversity within and between sites and compared them with human and other livestock. The current Porcine 60K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel has an average SNP distance in a range of 30 - 40 kb. Most of genetic variation was distribute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Chunyan, Plastow, Graham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966252
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920211795564386
_version_ 1782207503320219648
author Zhang, Chunyan
Plastow, Graham
author_facet Zhang, Chunyan
Plastow, Graham
author_sort Zhang, Chunyan
collection PubMed
description We have reviewed the current pig (Sus scrofa) genomic diversity within and between sites and compared them with human and other livestock. The current Porcine 60K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel has an average SNP distance in a range of 30 - 40 kb. Most of genetic variation was distributed within populations, and only a small proportion of them existed between populations. The average heterozygosity was lower in pig than in human and other livestock. Genetic inbreeding coefficient (F(IS)), population differentiation (F(ST)), and Nei’s genetic distance between populations were much larger in pig than in human and other livestock. Higher average genetic distance existed between European and Asian populations than between European or between Asian populations. Asian breeds harboured much larger variability and higher average heterozygosity than European breeds. The samples of wild boar that have been analyzed displayed more extensive genetic variation than domestic breeds. The average linkage disequilibrium (LD) in improved pig breeds extended to 1 - 3 cM, much larger than that in human (~ 30 kb) and cattle (~ 100 kb), but smaller than that in sheep (~ 10 cM). European breeds showed greater LD that decayed more slowly than Asian breeds. We briefly discuss some processes for maintaining genomic diversity in pig, including migration, introgression, selection, and drift. We conclude that, due to the long time of domestication, the pig possesses lower heterozygosity, higher F(IS), and larger LD compared with human and cattle. This implies that a smaller effective population size and less informative markers are needed in pig for genome wide association studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3129048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Bentham Science Publishers Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31290482011-10-01 Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock Zhang, Chunyan Plastow, Graham Curr Genomics Article We have reviewed the current pig (Sus scrofa) genomic diversity within and between sites and compared them with human and other livestock. The current Porcine 60K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel has an average SNP distance in a range of 30 - 40 kb. Most of genetic variation was distributed within populations, and only a small proportion of them existed between populations. The average heterozygosity was lower in pig than in human and other livestock. Genetic inbreeding coefficient (F(IS)), population differentiation (F(ST)), and Nei’s genetic distance between populations were much larger in pig than in human and other livestock. Higher average genetic distance existed between European and Asian populations than between European or between Asian populations. Asian breeds harboured much larger variability and higher average heterozygosity than European breeds. The samples of wild boar that have been analyzed displayed more extensive genetic variation than domestic breeds. The average linkage disequilibrium (LD) in improved pig breeds extended to 1 - 3 cM, much larger than that in human (~ 30 kb) and cattle (~ 100 kb), but smaller than that in sheep (~ 10 cM). European breeds showed greater LD that decayed more slowly than Asian breeds. We briefly discuss some processes for maintaining genomic diversity in pig, including migration, introgression, selection, and drift. We conclude that, due to the long time of domestication, the pig possesses lower heterozygosity, higher F(IS), and larger LD compared with human and cattle. This implies that a smaller effective population size and less informative markers are needed in pig for genome wide association studies. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd 2011-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3129048/ /pubmed/21966252 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920211795564386 Text en ©2011 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Chunyan
Plastow, Graham
Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock
title Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock
title_full Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock
title_fullStr Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock
title_short Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock
title_sort genomic diversity in pig (sus scrofa) and its comparison with human and other livestock
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966252
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920211795564386
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangchunyan genomicdiversityinpigsusscrofaanditscomparisonwithhumanandotherlivestock
AT plastowgraham genomicdiversityinpigsusscrofaanditscomparisonwithhumanandotherlivestock