Cargando…

New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review

BACKGROUND: Lower digestive endoscopy is mostly limited to the cecum without any attempt to penetrate the ileum. One of the probable reasons is the expectation of a low diagnostic yield. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of ileoscopy during colonoscopy and its diagnostic yield. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emami, Mohammad Hasssan, Behbahan, Iman Saramipoor, Zade, Hamed Daghagh, Daneshgar, Hoshang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772877
_version_ 1782207505065050112
author Emami, Mohammad Hasssan
Behbahan, Iman Saramipoor
Zade, Hamed Daghagh
Daneshgar, Hoshang
author_facet Emami, Mohammad Hasssan
Behbahan, Iman Saramipoor
Zade, Hamed Daghagh
Daneshgar, Hoshang
author_sort Emami, Mohammad Hasssan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lower digestive endoscopy is mostly limited to the cecum without any attempt to penetrate the ileum. One of the probable reasons is the expectation of a low diagnostic yield. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of ileoscopy during colonoscopy and its diagnostic yield. METHODS: We prospectively studied 128 consecutive patients, who were referred to Poursina Hakim Research Institute for lower GI disorders evaluation over a four months period, from March to July 2003. We tried to do total colonoscopy and ileal intubation with special attention to the timing and success rate of colonoscopy in each landmark. RESULTS: Out of 128 subjects, successful examination of cecum was done in 120 (93.6%). Out of 120 patients whose cecum was reached and studied, we intended to perform ileal intubation in 99 patients. Successful terminal ileal (TI) intubation was accomplished in 93(93.9 %) of the examinations. Abnormal findings were seen in 4 cases. Normal ileal findings were also helpful in ruling out TI pathology in 78 other patients with abdominal pain, weight loss, lower GI bleeding or colonic inflammation, which made ileoscopy clinically valuable in 82 of 95 normal ileal examinations (86.3%) in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Ileoscopy is safe, fast and feasible, so we recommend it in all symptomatic cases since normal findings are also valuable in patients’ clinical management. Considering normal findings, the routine ileoscopy had surprisingly higher diagnostic yield compared to the results of previous studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3129055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31290552011-07-19 New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review Emami, Mohammad Hasssan Behbahan, Iman Saramipoor Zade, Hamed Daghagh Daneshgar, Hoshang J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Lower digestive endoscopy is mostly limited to the cecum without any attempt to penetrate the ileum. One of the probable reasons is the expectation of a low diagnostic yield. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of ileoscopy during colonoscopy and its diagnostic yield. METHODS: We prospectively studied 128 consecutive patients, who were referred to Poursina Hakim Research Institute for lower GI disorders evaluation over a four months period, from March to July 2003. We tried to do total colonoscopy and ileal intubation with special attention to the timing and success rate of colonoscopy in each landmark. RESULTS: Out of 128 subjects, successful examination of cecum was done in 120 (93.6%). Out of 120 patients whose cecum was reached and studied, we intended to perform ileal intubation in 99 patients. Successful terminal ileal (TI) intubation was accomplished in 93(93.9 %) of the examinations. Abnormal findings were seen in 4 cases. Normal ileal findings were also helpful in ruling out TI pathology in 78 other patients with abdominal pain, weight loss, lower GI bleeding or colonic inflammation, which made ileoscopy clinically valuable in 82 of 95 normal ileal examinations (86.3%) in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Ileoscopy is safe, fast and feasible, so we recommend it in all symptomatic cases since normal findings are also valuable in patients’ clinical management. Considering normal findings, the routine ileoscopy had surprisingly higher diagnostic yield compared to the results of previous studies. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3129055/ /pubmed/21772877 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Emami, Mohammad Hasssan
Behbahan, Iman Saramipoor
Zade, Hamed Daghagh
Daneshgar, Hoshang
New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review
title New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review
title_full New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review
title_fullStr New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review
title_full_unstemmed New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review
title_short New interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: A prospective study and a brief review
title_sort new interpretation for diagnostic yield of ileoscopy: a prospective study and a brief review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772877
work_keys_str_mv AT emamimohammadhasssan newinterpretationfordiagnosticyieldofileoscopyaprospectivestudyandabriefreview
AT behbahanimansaramipoor newinterpretationfordiagnosticyieldofileoscopyaprospectivestudyandabriefreview
AT zadehameddaghagh newinterpretationfordiagnosticyieldofileoscopyaprospectivestudyandabriefreview
AT daneshgarhoshang newinterpretationfordiagnosticyieldofileoscopyaprospectivestudyandabriefreview