Cargando…

Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up

BACKGROUND: Radial club hand includes wide spectrum of malformations that involve radial side of forearm. Conservative treatments are recommended to the milder types and surgical interventions specially centralization for the severe forms. Recurrence after centralization is one of the challenging pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shariatzadeh, Hooman, Jafari, Dawood, Taheri, Hamid, Mazhar, Farid Najid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772880
_version_ 1782207505761304576
author Shariatzadeh, Hooman
Jafari, Dawood
Taheri, Hamid
Mazhar, Farid Najid
author_facet Shariatzadeh, Hooman
Jafari, Dawood
Taheri, Hamid
Mazhar, Farid Najid
author_sort Shariatzadeh, Hooman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radial club hand includes wide spectrum of malformations that involve radial side of forearm. Conservative treatments are recommended to the milder types and surgical interventions specially centralization for the severe forms. Recurrence after centralization is one of the challenging problems in this anomaly. In this study, we assessed the recurrence rate of centralization in radial club hand surgery in long term follow up. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the records and radiographies of 9 patients with radial club hand who underwent centralization to correct the deformity in the hand surgery department. Patients’ age, type of the thumb anomaly, associated anomalies in other systems, involved side, type of radial club hand, hand-forearm angle preoperative, post operative and in the last follow up visit, and centralized wrists motion range in the final follow up visit were all assessed and reported. RESULTS: Eleven cases of radial club hand in nine patients underwent centralization. Mean age at the time of the centralization was 17 (6-72) months and mean follow up was 90 (48-170) months. Preoperative hand-forearm angle was 75 (30-110) degrees, immediate postoperative angle was 25 (15-35) degrees and in the last follow up visit it was 52 (40-60) degrees. The amount of correction was 66% and loss of correction in long term was 54%. CONCLUSION: Centralization still can be a standard procedure in treatment of patients with radial club hand with acceptable results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3129058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31290582011-07-19 Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up Shariatzadeh, Hooman Jafari, Dawood Taheri, Hamid Mazhar, Farid Najid J Res Med Sci Short Communication BACKGROUND: Radial club hand includes wide spectrum of malformations that involve radial side of forearm. Conservative treatments are recommended to the milder types and surgical interventions specially centralization for the severe forms. Recurrence after centralization is one of the challenging problems in this anomaly. In this study, we assessed the recurrence rate of centralization in radial club hand surgery in long term follow up. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the records and radiographies of 9 patients with radial club hand who underwent centralization to correct the deformity in the hand surgery department. Patients’ age, type of the thumb anomaly, associated anomalies in other systems, involved side, type of radial club hand, hand-forearm angle preoperative, post operative and in the last follow up visit, and centralized wrists motion range in the final follow up visit were all assessed and reported. RESULTS: Eleven cases of radial club hand in nine patients underwent centralization. Mean age at the time of the centralization was 17 (6-72) months and mean follow up was 90 (48-170) months. Preoperative hand-forearm angle was 75 (30-110) degrees, immediate postoperative angle was 25 (15-35) degrees and in the last follow up visit it was 52 (40-60) degrees. The amount of correction was 66% and loss of correction in long term was 54%. CONCLUSION: Centralization still can be a standard procedure in treatment of patients with radial club hand with acceptable results. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3129058/ /pubmed/21772880 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Shariatzadeh, Hooman
Jafari, Dawood
Taheri, Hamid
Mazhar, Farid Najid
Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
title Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
title_full Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
title_fullStr Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
title_short Recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
title_sort recurrence rate after radial club hand surgery in long term follow up
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21772880
work_keys_str_mv AT shariatzadehhooman recurrencerateafterradialclubhandsurgeryinlongtermfollowup
AT jafaridawood recurrencerateafterradialclubhandsurgeryinlongtermfollowup
AT taherihamid recurrencerateafterradialclubhandsurgeryinlongtermfollowup
AT mazharfaridnajid recurrencerateafterradialclubhandsurgeryinlongtermfollowup