Cargando…

Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians

BACKGROUND: The health condition of workers is known to impact on productivity outcomes. The relationship between health and productivity is of increasing interest amid the need to increase productivity to meet global financial challenges. Prevalence of psychological distress is also of growing conc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holden, Libby, Scuffham, Paul A, Hilton, Michael F, Ware, Robert S, Vecchio, Nerina, Whiteford, Harvey A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21627840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-417
_version_ 1782207531767037952
author Holden, Libby
Scuffham, Paul A
Hilton, Michael F
Ware, Robert S
Vecchio, Nerina
Whiteford, Harvey A
author_facet Holden, Libby
Scuffham, Paul A
Hilton, Michael F
Ware, Robert S
Vecchio, Nerina
Whiteford, Harvey A
author_sort Holden, Libby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The health condition of workers is known to impact on productivity outcomes. The relationship between health and productivity is of increasing interest amid the need to increase productivity to meet global financial challenges. Prevalence of psychological distress is also of growing concern in Australia with a two-fold increase in the prevalence of psychological distress in Australia from 1997-2005. METHODS: We used the cross-sectional data set from the Australian Work Outcomes Research Cost-benefit (WORC) study to explore the impacts of health conditions with and without co-morbid psychological distress, compared to those with neither condition, in a sample of approximately 78,000 working Australians. The World Health Organisation Health and Performance Questionnaire was used which provided data on demographic characteristics, health condition and working conditions. Data were analysed using negative binomial logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models for absenteeism and presenteeism respectively. RESULTS: For both absenteeism and presenteeism productivity measures there was a greater risk of productivity loss associated when health conditions were co-morbid with psychological distress. For some conditions this risk was much greater for those with co-morbid psychological distress compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: Co-morbid psychological distress demonstrates an increased risk of productivity loss for a range of health conditions. These findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether co-morbid psychological distress potentially exacerbates lost productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3129311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31293112011-07-05 Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians Holden, Libby Scuffham, Paul A Hilton, Michael F Ware, Robert S Vecchio, Nerina Whiteford, Harvey A BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The health condition of workers is known to impact on productivity outcomes. The relationship between health and productivity is of increasing interest amid the need to increase productivity to meet global financial challenges. Prevalence of psychological distress is also of growing concern in Australia with a two-fold increase in the prevalence of psychological distress in Australia from 1997-2005. METHODS: We used the cross-sectional data set from the Australian Work Outcomes Research Cost-benefit (WORC) study to explore the impacts of health conditions with and without co-morbid psychological distress, compared to those with neither condition, in a sample of approximately 78,000 working Australians. The World Health Organisation Health and Performance Questionnaire was used which provided data on demographic characteristics, health condition and working conditions. Data were analysed using negative binomial logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models for absenteeism and presenteeism respectively. RESULTS: For both absenteeism and presenteeism productivity measures there was a greater risk of productivity loss associated when health conditions were co-morbid with psychological distress. For some conditions this risk was much greater for those with co-morbid psychological distress compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: Co-morbid psychological distress demonstrates an increased risk of productivity loss for a range of health conditions. These findings highlight the need for further research to determine whether co-morbid psychological distress potentially exacerbates lost productivity. BioMed Central 2011-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3129311/ /pubmed/21627840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-417 Text en Copyright ©2011 Holden et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Holden, Libby
Scuffham, Paul A
Hilton, Michael F
Ware, Robert S
Vecchio, Nerina
Whiteford, Harvey A
Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians
title Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians
title_full Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians
title_fullStr Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians
title_full_unstemmed Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians
title_short Health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working Australians
title_sort health-related productivity losses increase when the health condition is co-morbid with psychological distress: findings from a large cross-sectional sample of working australians
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21627840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-417
work_keys_str_mv AT holdenlibby healthrelatedproductivitylossesincreasewhenthehealthconditioniscomorbidwithpsychologicaldistressfindingsfromalargecrosssectionalsampleofworkingaustralians
AT scuffhampaula healthrelatedproductivitylossesincreasewhenthehealthconditioniscomorbidwithpsychologicaldistressfindingsfromalargecrosssectionalsampleofworkingaustralians
AT hiltonmichaelf healthrelatedproductivitylossesincreasewhenthehealthconditioniscomorbidwithpsychologicaldistressfindingsfromalargecrosssectionalsampleofworkingaustralians
AT wareroberts healthrelatedproductivitylossesincreasewhenthehealthconditioniscomorbidwithpsychologicaldistressfindingsfromalargecrosssectionalsampleofworkingaustralians
AT vecchionerina healthrelatedproductivitylossesincreasewhenthehealthconditioniscomorbidwithpsychologicaldistressfindingsfromalargecrosssectionalsampleofworkingaustralians
AT whitefordharveya healthrelatedproductivitylossesincreasewhenthehealthconditioniscomorbidwithpsychologicaldistressfindingsfromalargecrosssectionalsampleofworkingaustralians