Cargando…

Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaf heteroblasty involves dramatic phenotypic differences between adult and seedling leaves while leaves of homoblastic plants display only small differences. This study tested whether, in low-light environments, the marked difference in the morphology of seedling leaves that c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gamage, Harshi K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22476483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr013
_version_ 1782207544084660224
author Gamage, Harshi K.
author_facet Gamage, Harshi K.
author_sort Gamage, Harshi K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaf heteroblasty involves dramatic phenotypic differences between adult and seedling leaves while leaves of homoblastic plants display only small differences. This study tested whether, in low-light environments, the marked difference in the morphology of seedling leaves that characterizes heteroblastic species confers advantages for seedling survival and growth compared with homoblastic congeners. METHODOLOGY: Four pairs of heteroblastic and homoblastic species in genera Hoheria, Aristotelia, Pseudopanax and Melicope were grown in simulated full sunlight (100 % of light, red:far red ratio (R:FR) = 1.25) or in simulated forest understorey shade (5 % of full sunlight, R:FR ratio = 0.25) in a glasshouse. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: After 9 months, 100 % of seedlings of both homoblastic and heteroblastic species survived in full sun while in the understorey treatment there were 25 % fewer heteroblastic survivors than homoblastic congeners. Compared with homoblastic congeners, all heteroblastic species except for Pseudopanax crassifolius produced more and smaller leaves and branches, but grew more slowly in height, root collar diameter and total biomass both in full sun and in forest understorey treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Homoblastic species survive and grow better in the forest understorey light treatment, suggesting that heteroblastic seedling leaf morphology does not give an advantage over homoblastic congeners under low light intensities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3129537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31295372011-07-05 Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival Gamage, Harshi K. AoB Plants Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaf heteroblasty involves dramatic phenotypic differences between adult and seedling leaves while leaves of homoblastic plants display only small differences. This study tested whether, in low-light environments, the marked difference in the morphology of seedling leaves that characterizes heteroblastic species confers advantages for seedling survival and growth compared with homoblastic congeners. METHODOLOGY: Four pairs of heteroblastic and homoblastic species in genera Hoheria, Aristotelia, Pseudopanax and Melicope were grown in simulated full sunlight (100 % of light, red:far red ratio (R:FR) = 1.25) or in simulated forest understorey shade (5 % of full sunlight, R:FR ratio = 0.25) in a glasshouse. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: After 9 months, 100 % of seedlings of both homoblastic and heteroblastic species survived in full sun while in the understorey treatment there were 25 % fewer heteroblastic survivors than homoblastic congeners. Compared with homoblastic congeners, all heteroblastic species except for Pseudopanax crassifolius produced more and smaller leaves and branches, but grew more slowly in height, root collar diameter and total biomass both in full sun and in forest understorey treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Homoblastic species survive and grow better in the forest understorey light treatment, suggesting that heteroblastic seedling leaf morphology does not give an advantage over homoblastic congeners under low light intensities. Oxford University Press 2011 2011-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3129537/ /pubmed/22476483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr013 Text en Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gamage, Harshi K.
Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
title Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
title_full Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
title_fullStr Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
title_short Phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
title_sort phenotypic variation in heteroblastic woody species does not contribute to shade survival
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22476483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr013
work_keys_str_mv AT gamageharshik phenotypicvariationinheteroblasticwoodyspeciesdoesnotcontributetoshadesurvival