Cargando…

Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis

BACKGROUND: Algorithms to diagnose gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT, sleeping sickness) are often complex due to the unsatisfactory sensitivity and/or specificity of available tests, and typically include a screening (serological), confirmation (parasitological) and staging component. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Checchi, Francesco, Chappuis, François, Karunakara, Unni, Priotto, Gerardo, Chandramohan, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001233
_version_ 1782207571957907456
author Checchi, Francesco
Chappuis, François
Karunakara, Unni
Priotto, Gerardo
Chandramohan, Daniel
author_facet Checchi, Francesco
Chappuis, François
Karunakara, Unni
Priotto, Gerardo
Chandramohan, Daniel
author_sort Checchi, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Algorithms to diagnose gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT, sleeping sickness) are often complex due to the unsatisfactory sensitivity and/or specificity of available tests, and typically include a screening (serological), confirmation (parasitological) and staging component. There is insufficient evidence on the relative accuracy of these algorithms. This paper presents estimates of the accuracy of five algorithms used by past Médecins Sans Frontières programmes in the Republic of Congo, Southern Sudan and Uganda. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The sequence of tests in each algorithm was programmed into a probabilistic model, informed by distributions of the sensitivity, specificity and staging accuracy of each test, constructed based on a literature review. The accuracy of algorithms was estimated in a baseline scenario and in a worst-case scenario introducing various near worst-case assumptions. In the baseline scenario, sensitivity was estimated as 85–90% in all but one algorithm, with specificity above 99.9% except for the Republic of Congo, where CATT serology was used as independent confirmation test: here, positive predictive value (PPV) was estimated at <50% in realistic active screening prevalence scenarios. Furthermore, most algorithms misclassified about one third of true stage 1 cases as stage 2, and about 10% of true stage 2 cases as stage 1. In the worst-case scenario, sensitivity was 75–90% and PPV no more than 75% at 1% prevalence, with about half of stage 1 cases misclassified as stage 2. CONCLUSIONS: Published evidence on the accuracy of widely used tests is scanty. Algorithms should carefully weigh the use of serology alone for confirmation, and could enhance sensitivity through serological suspect follow-up and repeat parasitology. Better evidence on the frequency of low-parasitaemia infections is needed. Simulation studies should guide the tailoring of algorithms to specific scenarios of HAT prevalence and availability of control tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31300082011-07-12 Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis Checchi, Francesco Chappuis, François Karunakara, Unni Priotto, Gerardo Chandramohan, Daniel PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Algorithms to diagnose gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT, sleeping sickness) are often complex due to the unsatisfactory sensitivity and/or specificity of available tests, and typically include a screening (serological), confirmation (parasitological) and staging component. There is insufficient evidence on the relative accuracy of these algorithms. This paper presents estimates of the accuracy of five algorithms used by past Médecins Sans Frontières programmes in the Republic of Congo, Southern Sudan and Uganda. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The sequence of tests in each algorithm was programmed into a probabilistic model, informed by distributions of the sensitivity, specificity and staging accuracy of each test, constructed based on a literature review. The accuracy of algorithms was estimated in a baseline scenario and in a worst-case scenario introducing various near worst-case assumptions. In the baseline scenario, sensitivity was estimated as 85–90% in all but one algorithm, with specificity above 99.9% except for the Republic of Congo, where CATT serology was used as independent confirmation test: here, positive predictive value (PPV) was estimated at <50% in realistic active screening prevalence scenarios. Furthermore, most algorithms misclassified about one third of true stage 1 cases as stage 2, and about 10% of true stage 2 cases as stage 1. In the worst-case scenario, sensitivity was 75–90% and PPV no more than 75% at 1% prevalence, with about half of stage 1 cases misclassified as stage 2. CONCLUSIONS: Published evidence on the accuracy of widely used tests is scanty. Algorithms should carefully weigh the use of serology alone for confirmation, and could enhance sensitivity through serological suspect follow-up and repeat parasitology. Better evidence on the frequency of low-parasitaemia infections is needed. Simulation studies should guide the tailoring of algorithms to specific scenarios of HAT prevalence and availability of control tools. Public Library of Science 2011-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3130008/ /pubmed/21750745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001233 Text en Checchi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Checchi, Francesco
Chappuis, François
Karunakara, Unni
Priotto, Gerardo
Chandramohan, Daniel
Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis
title Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_full Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_fullStr Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_short Accuracy of Five Algorithms to Diagnose Gambiense Human African Trypanosomiasis
title_sort accuracy of five algorithms to diagnose gambiense human african trypanosomiasis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001233
work_keys_str_mv AT checchifrancesco accuracyoffivealgorithmstodiagnosegambiensehumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT chappuisfrancois accuracyoffivealgorithmstodiagnosegambiensehumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT karunakaraunni accuracyoffivealgorithmstodiagnosegambiensehumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT priottogerardo accuracyoffivealgorithmstodiagnosegambiensehumanafricantrypanosomiasis
AT chandramohandaniel accuracyoffivealgorithmstodiagnosegambiensehumanafricantrypanosomiasis