Cargando…

Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana

Nepenthes pitchers are specialized leaves that function as insect traps. Several pitcher components may contribute to trapping, including the pitcher fluid, slippery wax crystals and downward-pointing epidermal cells on the inner pitcher wall, and the wetness-dependent pitcher rim (peristome), but t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bauer, Ulrike, Grafe, T. Ulmar, Federle, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21459766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err082
_version_ 1782207592372633600
author Bauer, Ulrike
Grafe, T. Ulmar
Federle, Walter
author_facet Bauer, Ulrike
Grafe, T. Ulmar
Federle, Walter
author_sort Bauer, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description Nepenthes pitchers are specialized leaves that function as insect traps. Several pitcher components may contribute to trapping, including the pitcher fluid, slippery wax crystals and downward-pointing epidermal cells on the inner pitcher wall, and the wetness-dependent pitcher rim (peristome), but the relative importance of these traits is unclear. Mechanisms of prey capture and retention in the field were investigated by quantifying the effect of ‘knock-out’ manipulations of individual pitcher structures, and by testing the ability of pitcher fluids and water to retain insects. Two forms of Nepenthes rafflesiana Jack (‘elongate’ and ‘typical’) with contrasting combinations of pitcher traits were compared. Wax crystals on the inner pitcher wall were found to be the most important trapping structure in the elongate form, whereas the typical form relied primarily on the peristome. The pitcher fluids of both forms, differing markedly in the degree of viscoelasticity, retained significantly more ants than water. The present results show that pitcher plants utilize several mechanisms for prey capture and retention, varying in efficiency and relative importance between forms. It is proposed that these differences represent alternative prey capture strategies that may provide a mechanism to reduce competition and facilitate species co-existence in nutrient-limited habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31301842011-07-06 Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana Bauer, Ulrike Grafe, T. Ulmar Federle, Walter J Exp Bot Research Papers Nepenthes pitchers are specialized leaves that function as insect traps. Several pitcher components may contribute to trapping, including the pitcher fluid, slippery wax crystals and downward-pointing epidermal cells on the inner pitcher wall, and the wetness-dependent pitcher rim (peristome), but the relative importance of these traits is unclear. Mechanisms of prey capture and retention in the field were investigated by quantifying the effect of ‘knock-out’ manipulations of individual pitcher structures, and by testing the ability of pitcher fluids and water to retain insects. Two forms of Nepenthes rafflesiana Jack (‘elongate’ and ‘typical’) with contrasting combinations of pitcher traits were compared. Wax crystals on the inner pitcher wall were found to be the most important trapping structure in the elongate form, whereas the typical form relied primarily on the peristome. The pitcher fluids of both forms, differing markedly in the degree of viscoelasticity, retained significantly more ants than water. The present results show that pitcher plants utilize several mechanisms for prey capture and retention, varying in efficiency and relative importance between forms. It is proposed that these differences represent alternative prey capture strategies that may provide a mechanism to reduce competition and facilitate species co-existence in nutrient-limited habitats. Oxford University Press 2011-06 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3130184/ /pubmed/21459766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err082 Text en © 2011 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details)
spellingShingle Research Papers
Bauer, Ulrike
Grafe, T. Ulmar
Federle, Walter
Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana
title Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana
title_full Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana
title_fullStr Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana
title_short Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana
title_sort evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, nepenthes rafflesiana
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21459766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err082
work_keys_str_mv AT bauerulrike evidenceforalternativetrappingstrategiesintwoformsofthepitcherplantnepenthesrafflesiana
AT grafetulmar evidenceforalternativetrappingstrategiesintwoformsofthepitcherplantnepenthesrafflesiana
AT federlewalter evidenceforalternativetrappingstrategiesintwoformsofthepitcherplantnepenthesrafflesiana