Cargando…

Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel

AIM: To evaluate the peri-operative morbidity of men taking clopidogrel who underwent photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was collected. Between March 2005 and July 2010, 480 men underwent PVP. Of these, 18 men underwent PVP treatment while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spernat, Daniel M. G., Hossack, Tania A., Woo, Henry H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747600
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.82176
_version_ 1782207616753074176
author Spernat, Daniel M. G.
Hossack, Tania A.
Woo, Henry H.
author_facet Spernat, Daniel M. G.
Hossack, Tania A.
Woo, Henry H.
author_sort Spernat, Daniel M. G.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the peri-operative morbidity of men taking clopidogrel who underwent photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was collected. Between March 2005 and July 2010, 480 men underwent PVP. Of these, 18 men underwent PVP treatment while on clopidogrel. The surgery was carried out with either an 80W KTP laser or a 120W lithium triborate laser. RESULTS: In the peri-operative period there were no complications related to PVP. There were no urinary tract infections, nor did any patient require bladder re-catheterisation. No cardiovascular events were reported within 3 months of the procedure. At 3 months post operatively, the International Prostate Symptom Score±standard deviation had improved from was 17.5±10.6 to 9.2±6.1 P<0.05. While the Quality of Life±standard deviation improved from 4.7±1.2 to 2.2±1.5 P<0.01. The maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post void residual volume (PVR) improved from 6.2±3.0 mL/s to 19.7±9.1 mL/s (P<0.01), and 140±102 mL to 59±77 mL (P<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVP is a safe and efficacious in the treatment of high risk patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Further, the ability to continue therapeutic anticoagulation and anti-platelet agents, is a significant advantage over Holmium enucleation of the prostate and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Larger studies with greater numbers of patients are required prior to PVP becoming the gold standard for high-risk patients with bladder outlet obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31304862011-07-11 Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel Spernat, Daniel M. G. Hossack, Tania A. Woo, Henry H. Urol Ann Original Article AIM: To evaluate the peri-operative morbidity of men taking clopidogrel who underwent photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective database was collected. Between March 2005 and July 2010, 480 men underwent PVP. Of these, 18 men underwent PVP treatment while on clopidogrel. The surgery was carried out with either an 80W KTP laser or a 120W lithium triborate laser. RESULTS: In the peri-operative period there were no complications related to PVP. There were no urinary tract infections, nor did any patient require bladder re-catheterisation. No cardiovascular events were reported within 3 months of the procedure. At 3 months post operatively, the International Prostate Symptom Score±standard deviation had improved from was 17.5±10.6 to 9.2±6.1 P<0.05. While the Quality of Life±standard deviation improved from 4.7±1.2 to 2.2±1.5 P<0.01. The maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post void residual volume (PVR) improved from 6.2±3.0 mL/s to 19.7±9.1 mL/s (P<0.01), and 140±102 mL to 59±77 mL (P<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PVP is a safe and efficacious in the treatment of high risk patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Further, the ability to continue therapeutic anticoagulation and anti-platelet agents, is a significant advantage over Holmium enucleation of the prostate and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Larger studies with greater numbers of patients are required prior to PVP becoming the gold standard for high-risk patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3130486/ /pubmed/21747600 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.82176 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Spernat, Daniel M. G.
Hossack, Tania A.
Woo, Henry H.
Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
title Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
title_full Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
title_fullStr Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
title_full_unstemmed Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
title_short Photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
title_sort photoselective vaporization of the prostate in men taking clopidogrel
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747600
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.82176
work_keys_str_mv AT spernatdanielmg photoselectivevaporizationoftheprostateinmentakingclopidogrel
AT hossacktaniaa photoselectivevaporizationoftheprostateinmentakingclopidogrel
AT woohenryh photoselectivevaporizationoftheprostateinmentakingclopidogrel