Cargando…

How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?

BACKGROUND: The number of days of pedometer or accelerometer data needed to reliably assess physical activity (PA) is important for research that examines the relationship with health. While this important research has been completed in young to middle-aged adults, data is lacking in older adults. F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Teresa L, Swartz, Ann M, Cashin, Susan E, Strath, Scott J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21679426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-62
_version_ 1782207627681333248
author Hart, Teresa L
Swartz, Ann M
Cashin, Susan E
Strath, Scott J
author_facet Hart, Teresa L
Swartz, Ann M
Cashin, Susan E
Strath, Scott J
author_sort Hart, Teresa L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of days of pedometer or accelerometer data needed to reliably assess physical activity (PA) is important for research that examines the relationship with health. While this important research has been completed in young to middle-aged adults, data is lacking in older adults. Further, data determining the number of days of self-reports PA data is also void. The purpose of this study was to examine the number of days needed to predict habitual PA and sedentary behaviour across pedometer, accelerometer, and physical activity log (PA log) data in older adults. METHODS: Participants (52 older men and women; age = 69.3 ± 7.4 years, range= 55-86 years) wore a Yamax Digiwalker SW-200 pedometer and an ActiGraph 7164 accelerometer while completing a PA log for 21 consecutive days. Mean differences each instrument and intensity between days of the week were examined using separate repeated measures analysis of variance for with pairwise comparisons. Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formulae based on Intraclass Correlations of .80, .85, .90 and .95 were used to predict the number of days of accelerometer or pedometer wear or PA log daily records needed to represent total PA, light PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA, and sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: Results of this study showed that three days of accelerometer data, four days of pedometer data, or four days of completing PA logs are needed to accurately predict PA levels in older adults. When examining time spent in specific intensities of PA, fewer days of data are needed for accurate prediction of time spent in that activity for ActiGraph but more for the PA log. To accurately predict average daily time spent in sedentary behaviour, five days of ActiGraph data are needed. CONCLUSIONS: The number days of objective (pedometer and ActiGraph) and subjective (PA log) data needed to accurately estimate daily PA in older adults was relatively consistent. Despite no statistical differences between days for total PA by the pedometer and ActiGraph, the magnitude of differences between days suggests that day of the week cannot be completely ignored in the design and analysis of PA studies that involve < 7-day monitoring protocols for these instruments. More days of accelerometer data were needed to determine typical sedentary behaviour than PA level in this population of older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31306312011-07-07 How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults? Hart, Teresa L Swartz, Ann M Cashin, Susan E Strath, Scott J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The number of days of pedometer or accelerometer data needed to reliably assess physical activity (PA) is important for research that examines the relationship with health. While this important research has been completed in young to middle-aged adults, data is lacking in older adults. Further, data determining the number of days of self-reports PA data is also void. The purpose of this study was to examine the number of days needed to predict habitual PA and sedentary behaviour across pedometer, accelerometer, and physical activity log (PA log) data in older adults. METHODS: Participants (52 older men and women; age = 69.3 ± 7.4 years, range= 55-86 years) wore a Yamax Digiwalker SW-200 pedometer and an ActiGraph 7164 accelerometer while completing a PA log for 21 consecutive days. Mean differences each instrument and intensity between days of the week were examined using separate repeated measures analysis of variance for with pairwise comparisons. Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formulae based on Intraclass Correlations of .80, .85, .90 and .95 were used to predict the number of days of accelerometer or pedometer wear or PA log daily records needed to represent total PA, light PA, moderate-to-vigorous PA, and sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: Results of this study showed that three days of accelerometer data, four days of pedometer data, or four days of completing PA logs are needed to accurately predict PA levels in older adults. When examining time spent in specific intensities of PA, fewer days of data are needed for accurate prediction of time spent in that activity for ActiGraph but more for the PA log. To accurately predict average daily time spent in sedentary behaviour, five days of ActiGraph data are needed. CONCLUSIONS: The number days of objective (pedometer and ActiGraph) and subjective (PA log) data needed to accurately estimate daily PA in older adults was relatively consistent. Despite no statistical differences between days for total PA by the pedometer and ActiGraph, the magnitude of differences between days suggests that day of the week cannot be completely ignored in the design and analysis of PA studies that involve < 7-day monitoring protocols for these instruments. More days of accelerometer data were needed to determine typical sedentary behaviour than PA level in this population of older adults. BioMed Central 2011-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3130631/ /pubmed/21679426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-62 Text en Copyright ©2011 Hart et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hart, Teresa L
Swartz, Ann M
Cashin, Susan E
Strath, Scott J
How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
title How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
title_full How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
title_fullStr How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
title_full_unstemmed How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
title_short How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
title_sort how many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21679426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-62
work_keys_str_mv AT hartteresal howmanydaysofmonitoringpredictphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinolderadults
AT swartzannm howmanydaysofmonitoringpredictphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinolderadults
AT cashinsusane howmanydaysofmonitoringpredictphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinolderadults
AT strathscottj howmanydaysofmonitoringpredictphysicalactivityandsedentarybehaviourinolderadults