Cargando…

Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care

BACKGROUND: Physiology-based severity of illness scores are often used for risk adjustment in observational studies of intensive care unit (ICU) outcome. However, the complexity and time constraints of these scoring systems may limit their use in administrative databases. Comorbidity is a main deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Steffen, Johansen, Martin Berg, Christiansen, Christian Fynbo, Jensen, Reinhold, Lemeshow, Stanley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750629
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S20247
_version_ 1782207663654830080
author Christensen, Steffen
Johansen, Martin Berg
Christiansen, Christian Fynbo
Jensen, Reinhold
Lemeshow, Stanley
author_facet Christensen, Steffen
Johansen, Martin Berg
Christiansen, Christian Fynbo
Jensen, Reinhold
Lemeshow, Stanley
author_sort Christensen, Steffen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physiology-based severity of illness scores are often used for risk adjustment in observational studies of intensive care unit (ICU) outcome. However, the complexity and time constraints of these scoring systems may limit their use in administrative databases. Comorbidity is a main determinant of ICU outcome, and comorbidity scores can be computed based on data from most administrative databases. However, limited data exist on the performance of comorbidity scores in predicting mortality of ICU patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the performance of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) alone and in combination with other readily available administrative data and three physiology-based scores (acute physiology and chronic health evaluations [APACHE] II, simplified acute physiology score [SAPS] II, and SAPS III) in predicting short- and long-term mortality following intensive care. METHODS: For all adult patients (n = 469) admitted to a tertiary university–affiliated ICU in 2007, we computed APACHE II, SAPS II, and SAPS III scores based on data from medical records. Data on CCI score age and gender, surgical/medical status, social factors, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy, primary diagnosis, and complete follow-up for 1-year mortality was obtained from administrative databases. We computed goodness-of-fit statistics and c-statistics (area under ROC [receiver operating characteristic] curve) as measures of model calibration (ability to predict mortality proportions over classes of risk) and discrimination (ability to discriminate among the patients who will die or survive), respectively. RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit statistics supported model fit for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality of all combinations of the CCI score. Combining the CCI score with other administrative data revealed c-statistics of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.81) for in-hospital mortality, 0.75 (95% CI 0.70–0.80) for 30-day mortality, and 0.72 (95% CI 0.68–0.77) for 1-year mortality. There were no major differences in c-statistics between physiology-based systems and the CCI combined with other administrative data. CONCLUSION: The CCI combined with administrative data predict short- and long-term mortality for ICU patients as well as physiology-based scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31309052011-07-12 Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care Christensen, Steffen Johansen, Martin Berg Christiansen, Christian Fynbo Jensen, Reinhold Lemeshow, Stanley Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: Physiology-based severity of illness scores are often used for risk adjustment in observational studies of intensive care unit (ICU) outcome. However, the complexity and time constraints of these scoring systems may limit their use in administrative databases. Comorbidity is a main determinant of ICU outcome, and comorbidity scores can be computed based on data from most administrative databases. However, limited data exist on the performance of comorbidity scores in predicting mortality of ICU patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the performance of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) alone and in combination with other readily available administrative data and three physiology-based scores (acute physiology and chronic health evaluations [APACHE] II, simplified acute physiology score [SAPS] II, and SAPS III) in predicting short- and long-term mortality following intensive care. METHODS: For all adult patients (n = 469) admitted to a tertiary university–affiliated ICU in 2007, we computed APACHE II, SAPS II, and SAPS III scores based on data from medical records. Data on CCI score age and gender, surgical/medical status, social factors, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy, primary diagnosis, and complete follow-up for 1-year mortality was obtained from administrative databases. We computed goodness-of-fit statistics and c-statistics (area under ROC [receiver operating characteristic] curve) as measures of model calibration (ability to predict mortality proportions over classes of risk) and discrimination (ability to discriminate among the patients who will die or survive), respectively. RESULTS: Goodness-of-fit statistics supported model fit for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality of all combinations of the CCI score. Combining the CCI score with other administrative data revealed c-statistics of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.81) for in-hospital mortality, 0.75 (95% CI 0.70–0.80) for 30-day mortality, and 0.72 (95% CI 0.68–0.77) for 1-year mortality. There were no major differences in c-statistics between physiology-based systems and the CCI combined with other administrative data. CONCLUSION: The CCI combined with administrative data predict short- and long-term mortality for ICU patients as well as physiology-based scores. Dove Medical Press 2011-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3130905/ /pubmed/21750629 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S20247 Text en © 2011 Christensen et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Christensen, Steffen
Johansen, Martin Berg
Christiansen, Christian Fynbo
Jensen, Reinhold
Lemeshow, Stanley
Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
title Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
title_full Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
title_fullStr Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
title_short Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
title_sort comparison of charlson comorbidity index with saps and apache scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750629
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S20247
work_keys_str_mv AT christensensteffen comparisonofcharlsoncomorbidityindexwithsapsandapachescoresforpredictionofmortalityfollowingintensivecare
AT johansenmartinberg comparisonofcharlsoncomorbidityindexwithsapsandapachescoresforpredictionofmortalityfollowingintensivecare
AT christiansenchristianfynbo comparisonofcharlsoncomorbidityindexwithsapsandapachescoresforpredictionofmortalityfollowingintensivecare
AT jensenreinhold comparisonofcharlsoncomorbidityindexwithsapsandapachescoresforpredictionofmortalityfollowingintensivecare
AT lemeshowstanley comparisonofcharlsoncomorbidityindexwithsapsandapachescoresforpredictionofmortalityfollowingintensivecare