Cargando…

Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies

Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to ado...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satterlund, Travis D., Cassady, Diana, Treiber, Jeanette, Lemp, Cathy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21193951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6
_version_ 1782207663881322496
author Satterlund, Travis D.
Cassady, Diana
Treiber, Jeanette
Lemp, Cathy
author_facet Satterlund, Travis D.
Cassady, Diana
Treiber, Jeanette
Lemp, Cathy
author_sort Satterlund, Travis D.
collection PubMed
description Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to adopting and implementing outdoor smoke-free policies, focusing on the major barriers faced by local-level tobacco control organizations in this process. Ninety-six projects funded by the California Tobacco Control Program submitted final evaluation reports pertaining to an outdoor smoking objective, and the reports from these projects were analyzed. The barriers were grouped in three primary areas: politically polarizing barriers, organizational barriers, and local political orientation. The barriers identified in this study underscore the need for an organized action plan in adopting local tobacco policy. The authors also suggest potential strategies to offset the barriers, including: (1) having a “champion” who helps to carry an objective forward; (2) tapping into a pool of youth volunteers; (3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool; (4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts; (5) working strategically within the local political climate; and (6) demonstrating to policymakers the constituent support for proposed policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31309062011-08-10 Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies Satterlund, Travis D. Cassady, Diana Treiber, Jeanette Lemp, Cathy J Community Health Original Paper Although California communities have been relatively successful in adopting and implementing a wide range of local tobacco control policies, the process has not been without its setbacks and barriers. Little is known about local policy adoption, and this paper examines these processes related to adopting and implementing outdoor smoke-free policies, focusing on the major barriers faced by local-level tobacco control organizations in this process. Ninety-six projects funded by the California Tobacco Control Program submitted final evaluation reports pertaining to an outdoor smoking objective, and the reports from these projects were analyzed. The barriers were grouped in three primary areas: politically polarizing barriers, organizational barriers, and local political orientation. The barriers identified in this study underscore the need for an organized action plan in adopting local tobacco policy. The authors also suggest potential strategies to offset the barriers, including: (1) having a “champion” who helps to carry an objective forward; (2) tapping into a pool of youth volunteers; (3) collecting and using local data as a persuasive tool; (4) educating the community in smoke-free policy efforts; (5) working strategically within the local political climate; and (6) demonstrating to policymakers the constituent support for proposed policy. Springer US 2010-12-31 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3130906/ /pubmed/21193951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Satterlund, Travis D.
Cassady, Diana
Treiber, Jeanette
Lemp, Cathy
Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
title Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
title_full Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
title_fullStr Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
title_short Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Local-Level Tobacco Control Policies
title_sort barriers to adopting and implementing local-level tobacco control policies
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21193951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9350-6
work_keys_str_mv AT satterlundtravisd barrierstoadoptingandimplementinglocalleveltobaccocontrolpolicies
AT cassadydiana barrierstoadoptingandimplementinglocalleveltobaccocontrolpolicies
AT treiberjeanette barrierstoadoptingandimplementinglocalleveltobaccocontrolpolicies
AT lempcathy barrierstoadoptingandimplementinglocalleveltobaccocontrolpolicies