Cargando…

Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve

PURPOSE: To evaluate and record the common complications that face surgeons when they perform their first few series of deep lamellar keratoplasty and measures to avoid these. SETTING: Dar El Oyoun Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: Retrospective study of the first 40 eyes of 40 patients carried out b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hosny, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S20943
_version_ 1782207666137858048
author Hosny, Mohamed
author_facet Hosny, Mohamed
author_sort Hosny, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate and record the common complications that face surgeons when they perform their first few series of deep lamellar keratoplasty and measures to avoid these. SETTING: Dar El Oyoun Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: Retrospective study of the first 40 eyes of 40 patients carried out by two corneal surgeons working in the same center. All patients were planned to undergo a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big bubble technique. Twelve patients suffered from keratoconus while 28 patients had anterior corneal pathologies. Recorded complications were classified as either intraoperative or postoperative. RESULTS: Perforation of Descemet’s membrane was the most common intraoperative complication. It occurred in nine eyes (22.5%): five eyes (12.5%) had microperforations while four eyes (10%) had macroperforations, three eyes (7.5%) had central perforations, and six eyes (15%) had peripheral perforations. Other complications included incomplete separation of Descemet’s membrane and remnants of peripheral stromal tissue. Postoperative complications included double anterior chamber which occurred in four eyes (10%) and Descemet’s membrane corrugations. Postoperative astigmatism ranged from 1.25 to 4.5 diopters with a mean of 2.86 diopters in the whole series, but in the six cases with identified residual stroma in the periphery of the host bed, the astigmatism ranged from 2.75 to 4.5 diopters with a mean of 3.62 diopters. CONCLUSION: Deep lamellar keratoplasty is sensitive to procedural details. Learning the common complications and how to avoid them helps novice surgeons to learn the procedure faster.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31309162011-07-12 Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve Hosny, Mohamed Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate and record the common complications that face surgeons when they perform their first few series of deep lamellar keratoplasty and measures to avoid these. SETTING: Dar El Oyoun Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: Retrospective study of the first 40 eyes of 40 patients carried out by two corneal surgeons working in the same center. All patients were planned to undergo a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big bubble technique. Twelve patients suffered from keratoconus while 28 patients had anterior corneal pathologies. Recorded complications were classified as either intraoperative or postoperative. RESULTS: Perforation of Descemet’s membrane was the most common intraoperative complication. It occurred in nine eyes (22.5%): five eyes (12.5%) had microperforations while four eyes (10%) had macroperforations, three eyes (7.5%) had central perforations, and six eyes (15%) had peripheral perforations. Other complications included incomplete separation of Descemet’s membrane and remnants of peripheral stromal tissue. Postoperative complications included double anterior chamber which occurred in four eyes (10%) and Descemet’s membrane corrugations. Postoperative astigmatism ranged from 1.25 to 4.5 diopters with a mean of 2.86 diopters in the whole series, but in the six cases with identified residual stroma in the periphery of the host bed, the astigmatism ranged from 2.75 to 4.5 diopters with a mean of 3.62 diopters. CONCLUSION: Deep lamellar keratoplasty is sensitive to procedural details. Learning the common complications and how to avoid them helps novice surgeons to learn the procedure faster. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3130916/ /pubmed/21750612 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S20943 Text en © 2011 Hosny, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hosny, Mohamed
Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
title Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
title_full Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
title_fullStr Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
title_full_unstemmed Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
title_short Common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
title_sort common complications of deep lamellar keratoplasty in the early phase of the learning curve
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21750612
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S20943
work_keys_str_mv AT hosnymohamed commoncomplicationsofdeeplamellarkeratoplastyintheearlyphaseofthelearningcurve