Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps

Traditionally, patients with colonic polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal require open colectomy for management. We evaluated our experience with minimally invasive approaches including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic polypectomy (LAEP), and laparoscopic-ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, R. Alejandro, Ragupathi, Madhu, Pedraza, Rodrigo, Pickron, T. Bartley, Le, Anne T., Haas, Eric M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/682793
_version_ 1782207673132908544
author Cruz, R. Alejandro
Ragupathi, Madhu
Pedraza, Rodrigo
Pickron, T. Bartley
Le, Anne T.
Haas, Eric M.
author_facet Cruz, R. Alejandro
Ragupathi, Madhu
Pedraza, Rodrigo
Pickron, T. Bartley
Le, Anne T.
Haas, Eric M.
author_sort Cruz, R. Alejandro
collection PubMed
description Traditionally, patients with colonic polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal require open colectomy for management. We evaluated our experience with minimally invasive approaches including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic polypectomy (LAEP), and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC). Patients referred for surgery for colonic polyps were selected for one of three minimally invasive modalities. A total of 123 patients were referred for resection of “difficult” polyps. Thirty underwent EMR, 25 underwent LAEP, and 68 underwent LAC. Of those selected to undergo EMR or LAEP, 76.4% were successfully managed without colon resection. The remaining 23.6% underwent LAC. Nine complications were encountered, including two requiring reoperative intervention. Of the 123 patients, three were found to have malignant disease on final pathology. Surgical resection can be avoided in a significant number of patients with “difficult” polyps referred for surgery by performing EMR and LAEP. In those who require surgery, minimally invasive resection can be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3130970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31309702011-07-11 Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps Cruz, R. Alejandro Ragupathi, Madhu Pedraza, Rodrigo Pickron, T. Bartley Le, Anne T. Haas, Eric M. Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article Traditionally, patients with colonic polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal require open colectomy for management. We evaluated our experience with minimally invasive approaches including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic polypectomy (LAEP), and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC). Patients referred for surgery for colonic polyps were selected for one of three minimally invasive modalities. A total of 123 patients were referred for resection of “difficult” polyps. Thirty underwent EMR, 25 underwent LAEP, and 68 underwent LAC. Of those selected to undergo EMR or LAEP, 76.4% were successfully managed without colon resection. The remaining 23.6% underwent LAC. Nine complications were encountered, including two requiring reoperative intervention. Of the 123 patients, three were found to have malignant disease on final pathology. Surgical resection can be avoided in a significant number of patients with “difficult” polyps referred for surgery by performing EMR and LAEP. In those who require surgery, minimally invasive resection can be achieved. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3130970/ /pubmed/21747655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/682793 Text en Copyright © 2011 R. Alejandro Cruz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cruz, R. Alejandro
Ragupathi, Madhu
Pedraza, Rodrigo
Pickron, T. Bartley
Le, Anne T.
Haas, Eric M.
Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps
title Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps
title_full Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps
title_short Minimally Invasive Approaches for the Management of “Difficult” Colonic Polyps
title_sort minimally invasive approaches for the management of “difficult” colonic polyps
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3130970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/682793
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzralejandro minimallyinvasiveapproachesforthemanagementofdifficultcolonicpolyps
AT ragupathimadhu minimallyinvasiveapproachesforthemanagementofdifficultcolonicpolyps
AT pedrazarodrigo minimallyinvasiveapproachesforthemanagementofdifficultcolonicpolyps
AT pickrontbartley minimallyinvasiveapproachesforthemanagementofdifficultcolonicpolyps
AT leannet minimallyinvasiveapproachesforthemanagementofdifficultcolonicpolyps
AT haasericm minimallyinvasiveapproachesforthemanagementofdifficultcolonicpolyps