Cargando…

Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study

This study was undertaken to assess vitamin D status in nonmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome (MeS) and to evaluate its possible role in inflammation and other components of MeS. A case-control study was conducted during late fall and winter 2009–10. A total of 375 women with waist circumferen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salekzamani, Shabnam, Neyestani, Tirang R, Alavi-Majd, Hamid, Houshiarrad, Anahita, Kalayi, Ali, Shariatzadeh, Nastaran, Gharavi, A’azam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760737
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S21061
_version_ 1782207765292253184
author Salekzamani, Shabnam
Neyestani, Tirang R
Alavi-Majd, Hamid
Houshiarrad, Anahita
Kalayi, Ali
Shariatzadeh, Nastaran
Gharavi, A’azam
author_facet Salekzamani, Shabnam
Neyestani, Tirang R
Alavi-Majd, Hamid
Houshiarrad, Anahita
Kalayi, Ali
Shariatzadeh, Nastaran
Gharavi, A’azam
author_sort Salekzamani, Shabnam
collection PubMed
description This study was undertaken to assess vitamin D status in nonmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome (MeS) and to evaluate its possible role in inflammation and other components of MeS. A case-control study was conducted during late fall and winter 2009–10. A total of 375 women with waist circumference (WC) ≥88 cm were examined to find 100 who met MeS criteria according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)/Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria (NCEP/ATP III). Of those without MeS, 100 age- and residence area-matched women were selected as a control group. Anthropometric and laboratory evaluations were performed. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), body mass index (BMI), homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and body fat mass (FM) were also evaluated. Women with MeS had significantly higher BMI, waist circumference (WC) and FM but lower serum osteocalcin than controls. There was no significant difference in serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) or vitamin D status between the two groups. Serum highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration was significantly higher in the MeS group, compared to the controls (3.4 ± 3.3 vs 2.0 ± 1.9 mg/L, P < 0.001). The difference remained significant even after controlling for BMI (P = 0.011), WC (P = 0.014) and FM (P = 0.005). When comparison was made only in those subjects with insulin resistance (HOMA-IR > 2.4), hsCRP was still higher in the MeS group (n = 79) than in the control group (n = 61) (P < 0.001). When data were categorized according to vitamin D status, in the MeS group significantly higher plasma glucose concentrations were observed in subjects with vitamin D deficiency compared to those with insufficiency or sufficiency (104.0 ± 11.7, 83.0 ± 11.3 and 83.2 ± 9.9 mg/dL, respectively, P < 0.001). Interestingly, their WC or WHR did not show any significant difference. In stepwise regression analysis, 25(OH)D was the main predictor of both hsCRP and plasma glucose. Vitamin D status may, at least in part, be a determining factor of systemic inflammation and the related metabolic derangements of MeS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3131801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31318012011-07-14 Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study Salekzamani, Shabnam Neyestani, Tirang R Alavi-Majd, Hamid Houshiarrad, Anahita Kalayi, Ali Shariatzadeh, Nastaran Gharavi, A’azam Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Original Research This study was undertaken to assess vitamin D status in nonmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome (MeS) and to evaluate its possible role in inflammation and other components of MeS. A case-control study was conducted during late fall and winter 2009–10. A total of 375 women with waist circumference (WC) ≥88 cm were examined to find 100 who met MeS criteria according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)/Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III criteria (NCEP/ATP III). Of those without MeS, 100 age- and residence area-matched women were selected as a control group. Anthropometric and laboratory evaluations were performed. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), body mass index (BMI), homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and body fat mass (FM) were also evaluated. Women with MeS had significantly higher BMI, waist circumference (WC) and FM but lower serum osteocalcin than controls. There was no significant difference in serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) or vitamin D status between the two groups. Serum highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration was significantly higher in the MeS group, compared to the controls (3.4 ± 3.3 vs 2.0 ± 1.9 mg/L, P < 0.001). The difference remained significant even after controlling for BMI (P = 0.011), WC (P = 0.014) and FM (P = 0.005). When comparison was made only in those subjects with insulin resistance (HOMA-IR > 2.4), hsCRP was still higher in the MeS group (n = 79) than in the control group (n = 61) (P < 0.001). When data were categorized according to vitamin D status, in the MeS group significantly higher plasma glucose concentrations were observed in subjects with vitamin D deficiency compared to those with insufficiency or sufficiency (104.0 ± 11.7, 83.0 ± 11.3 and 83.2 ± 9.9 mg/dL, respectively, P < 0.001). Interestingly, their WC or WHR did not show any significant difference. In stepwise regression analysis, 25(OH)D was the main predictor of both hsCRP and plasma glucose. Vitamin D status may, at least in part, be a determining factor of systemic inflammation and the related metabolic derangements of MeS. Dove Medical Press 2011-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3131801/ /pubmed/21760737 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S21061 Text en © 2011 Salekzamani et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Salekzamani, Shabnam
Neyestani, Tirang R
Alavi-Majd, Hamid
Houshiarrad, Anahita
Kalayi, Ali
Shariatzadeh, Nastaran
Gharavi, A’azam
Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study
title Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study
title_full Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study
title_fullStr Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study
title_short Is vitamin D status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? A case-control study
title_sort is vitamin d status a determining factor for metabolic syndrome? a case-control study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760737
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S21061
work_keys_str_mv AT salekzamanishabnam isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT neyestanitirangr isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT alavimajdhamid isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT houshiarradanahita isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT kalayiali isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT shariatzadehnastaran isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy
AT gharaviaazam isvitamindstatusadeterminingfactorformetabolicsyndromeacasecontrolstudy