Cargando…

Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center

In the past vascular surgeons were called in to place tunneled central venous catheter (TVC) for hemodialysis patients. Advent of percutaneous technique has resulted in an increasing number of interventional nephrologists inserting it. A single centre three year audit of 100 TVCs with a cumulative f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sampathkumar, K., Ramakrishnan, M., Sah, A. K., Sooraj, Y., Mahaldhar, A., Ajeshkumar, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769173
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.82133
_version_ 1782207803384922112
author Sampathkumar, K.
Ramakrishnan, M.
Sah, A. K.
Sooraj, Y.
Mahaldhar, A.
Ajeshkumar, R.
author_facet Sampathkumar, K.
Ramakrishnan, M.
Sah, A. K.
Sooraj, Y.
Mahaldhar, A.
Ajeshkumar, R.
author_sort Sampathkumar, K.
collection PubMed
description In the past vascular surgeons were called in to place tunneled central venous catheter (TVC) for hemodialysis patients. Advent of percutaneous technique has resulted in an increasing number of interventional nephrologists inserting it. A single centre three year audit of 100 TVCs with a cumulative follow up of 492 patient months is presented here. From 2007 to 2010, 100 TVCs were placed by nephrologists in a percutaneous fashion in the operative room or the interventional nephrology suite. Those who completed minimum of three months on the catheter were included in analysis. There were 69 males and 31 females with a mean age of 52.3±13.6 years.(range: 25-76). Chronic glomerulonephritis was the commonest cause of CKD (45%) followed by diabetes (39%).Right internal jugular vein was the preferred site (94%). TVC was utilized as the primary access to initiate dialysis in 25% of patients in whom a live donor was available for renal transplant. The blood flow was 250-270 ml/min. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 3 months and 6 months catheter survival rates were 80% and 55%, respectively. The main complications were exit site blood ooze, catheter block and kink. Catheter related bacteremia rate was low at 0.4/1000 patient days. Primary cause of drop out was patient death unrelated to the TVCs. Those under the age of 40 years showed better survival, but there was no bearing of gender, catheter site, and etiology of CKD on survival. Tunneled central venous catheters could find a niche as the primary access of choice for pretransplant live donor renal transplants in view of its immediate usage, high blood flows, low infection rates and adequate patency rates for 3-6 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3132329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31323292011-07-18 Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center Sampathkumar, K. Ramakrishnan, M. Sah, A. K. Sooraj, Y. Mahaldhar, A. Ajeshkumar, R. Indian J Nephrol Original Article In the past vascular surgeons were called in to place tunneled central venous catheter (TVC) for hemodialysis patients. Advent of percutaneous technique has resulted in an increasing number of interventional nephrologists inserting it. A single centre three year audit of 100 TVCs with a cumulative follow up of 492 patient months is presented here. From 2007 to 2010, 100 TVCs were placed by nephrologists in a percutaneous fashion in the operative room or the interventional nephrology suite. Those who completed minimum of three months on the catheter were included in analysis. There were 69 males and 31 females with a mean age of 52.3±13.6 years.(range: 25-76). Chronic glomerulonephritis was the commonest cause of CKD (45%) followed by diabetes (39%).Right internal jugular vein was the preferred site (94%). TVC was utilized as the primary access to initiate dialysis in 25% of patients in whom a live donor was available for renal transplant. The blood flow was 250-270 ml/min. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 3 months and 6 months catheter survival rates were 80% and 55%, respectively. The main complications were exit site blood ooze, catheter block and kink. Catheter related bacteremia rate was low at 0.4/1000 patient days. Primary cause of drop out was patient death unrelated to the TVCs. Those under the age of 40 years showed better survival, but there was no bearing of gender, catheter site, and etiology of CKD on survival. Tunneled central venous catheters could find a niche as the primary access of choice for pretransplant live donor renal transplants in view of its immediate usage, high blood flows, low infection rates and adequate patency rates for 3-6 months. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3132329/ /pubmed/21769173 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.82133 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sampathkumar, K.
Ramakrishnan, M.
Sah, A. K.
Sooraj, Y.
Mahaldhar, A.
Ajeshkumar, R.
Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center
title Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center
title_full Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center
title_fullStr Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center
title_full_unstemmed Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center
title_short Tunneled central venous catheters: Experience from a single center
title_sort tunneled central venous catheters: experience from a single center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769173
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.82133
work_keys_str_mv AT sampathkumark tunneledcentralvenouscathetersexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT ramakrishnanm tunneledcentralvenouscathetersexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT sahak tunneledcentralvenouscathetersexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT soorajy tunneledcentralvenouscathetersexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT mahaldhara tunneledcentralvenouscathetersexperiencefromasinglecenter
AT ajeshkumarr tunneledcentralvenouscathetersexperiencefromasinglecenter