Cargando…

Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis

Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gröschel, Klaus, Schnaudigel, Sonja, Wasser, Katrin, Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M., Ernemann, Ulrike, Knauth, Michael, Kastrup, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21264472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5909-0
_version_ 1782207817305817088
author Gröschel, Klaus
Schnaudigel, Sonja
Wasser, Katrin
Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M.
Ernemann, Ulrike
Knauth, Michael
Kastrup, Andreas
author_facet Gröschel, Klaus
Schnaudigel, Sonja
Wasser, Katrin
Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M.
Ernemann, Ulrike
Knauth, Michael
Kastrup, Andreas
author_sort Gröschel, Klaus
collection PubMed
description Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a prospective two-center CAS database was carried out to investigate the potential factors that influence a delayed CAS treatment. Of 374 patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis, 59.1% were treated beyond ≥14 days. A retinal TIA event (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.47–8.74, p < 0.01) was found to be a predictor for a delayed treatment, whereas the year of the intervention (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.20–0.50, p < 0.01) and a contralateral carotid occlusion (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21–0.86, p = 0.02) were predictive of an early treatment. Similarly, within the subgroup of patients with transient symptoms, the year of the intervention (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.59, p < 0.01) was associated with an early treatment, whereas a retinal TIA as the qualifying event (OR = 6.96, 95% CI 2.37–20.47, p < 0.01) was associated with a delayed treatment. Treatment delay was most pronounced in patients with an amaurosis fugax, whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion led to an early intervention. Although CAS is increasingly performed faster in the last years, there is still scope for an even more accelerated treatment strategy, which might prevent future recurrent strokes prior to treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3132402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31324022011-08-24 Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis Gröschel, Klaus Schnaudigel, Sonja Wasser, Katrin Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M. Ernemann, Ulrike Knauth, Michael Kastrup, Andreas J Neurol Original Communication Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a prospective two-center CAS database was carried out to investigate the potential factors that influence a delayed CAS treatment. Of 374 patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis, 59.1% were treated beyond ≥14 days. A retinal TIA event (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.47–8.74, p < 0.01) was found to be a predictor for a delayed treatment, whereas the year of the intervention (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.20–0.50, p < 0.01) and a contralateral carotid occlusion (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21–0.86, p = 0.02) were predictive of an early treatment. Similarly, within the subgroup of patients with transient symptoms, the year of the intervention (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.59, p < 0.01) was associated with an early treatment, whereas a retinal TIA as the qualifying event (OR = 6.96, 95% CI 2.37–20.47, p < 0.01) was associated with a delayed treatment. Treatment delay was most pronounced in patients with an amaurosis fugax, whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion led to an early intervention. Although CAS is increasingly performed faster in the last years, there is still scope for an even more accelerated treatment strategy, which might prevent future recurrent strokes prior to treatment. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-25 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3132402/ /pubmed/21264472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5909-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Gröschel, Klaus
Schnaudigel, Sonja
Wasser, Katrin
Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M.
Ernemann, Ulrike
Knauth, Michael
Kastrup, Andreas
Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
title Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
title_full Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
title_fullStr Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
title_short Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
title_sort factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21264472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5909-0
work_keys_str_mv AT groschelklaus factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis
AT schnaudigelsonja factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis
AT wasserkatrin factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis
AT pilgrampastorsaram factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis
AT ernemannulrike factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis
AT knauthmichael factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis
AT kastrupandreas factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis