Cargando…
Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a pros...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21264472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5909-0 |
_version_ | 1782207817305817088 |
---|---|
author | Gröschel, Klaus Schnaudigel, Sonja Wasser, Katrin Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M. Ernemann, Ulrike Knauth, Michael Kastrup, Andreas |
author_facet | Gröschel, Klaus Schnaudigel, Sonja Wasser, Katrin Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M. Ernemann, Ulrike Knauth, Michael Kastrup, Andreas |
author_sort | Gröschel, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a prospective two-center CAS database was carried out to investigate the potential factors that influence a delayed CAS treatment. Of 374 patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis, 59.1% were treated beyond ≥14 days. A retinal TIA event (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.47–8.74, p < 0.01) was found to be a predictor for a delayed treatment, whereas the year of the intervention (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.20–0.50, p < 0.01) and a contralateral carotid occlusion (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21–0.86, p = 0.02) were predictive of an early treatment. Similarly, within the subgroup of patients with transient symptoms, the year of the intervention (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.59, p < 0.01) was associated with an early treatment, whereas a retinal TIA as the qualifying event (OR = 6.96, 95% CI 2.37–20.47, p < 0.01) was associated with a delayed treatment. Treatment delay was most pronounced in patients with an amaurosis fugax, whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion led to an early intervention. Although CAS is increasingly performed faster in the last years, there is still scope for an even more accelerated treatment strategy, which might prevent future recurrent strokes prior to treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3132402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31324022011-08-24 Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis Gröschel, Klaus Schnaudigel, Sonja Wasser, Katrin Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M. Ernemann, Ulrike Knauth, Michael Kastrup, Andreas J Neurol Original Communication Treatment of a symptomatic stenosis is known to be most beneficial within 14 days after the presenting event but this can frequently not be achieved in daily practice. The aim of this study was the assessment of factors responsible for this time delay to treatment. A retrospective analysis of a prospective two-center CAS database was carried out to investigate the potential factors that influence a delayed CAS treatment. Of 374 patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis, 59.1% were treated beyond ≥14 days. A retinal TIA event (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.47–8.74, p < 0.01) was found to be a predictor for a delayed treatment, whereas the year of the intervention (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.20–0.50, p < 0.01) and a contralateral carotid occlusion (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.21–0.86, p = 0.02) were predictive of an early treatment. Similarly, within the subgroup of patients with transient symptoms, the year of the intervention (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.14–0.59, p < 0.01) was associated with an early treatment, whereas a retinal TIA as the qualifying event (OR = 6.96, 95% CI 2.37–20.47, p < 0.01) was associated with a delayed treatment. Treatment delay was most pronounced in patients with an amaurosis fugax, whereas a contralateral carotid occlusion led to an early intervention. Although CAS is increasingly performed faster in the last years, there is still scope for an even more accelerated treatment strategy, which might prevent future recurrent strokes prior to treatment. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-25 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3132402/ /pubmed/21264472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5909-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Communication Gröschel, Klaus Schnaudigel, Sonja Wasser, Katrin Pilgram-Pastor, Sara M. Ernemann, Ulrike Knauth, Michael Kastrup, Andreas Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
title | Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
title_full | Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
title_fullStr | Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
title_short | Factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
title_sort | factors associated with time delay to carotid stenting in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21264472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-5909-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groschelklaus factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis AT schnaudigelsonja factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis AT wasserkatrin factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis AT pilgrampastorsaram factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis AT ernemannulrike factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis AT knauthmichael factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis AT kastrupandreas factorsassociatedwithtimedelaytocarotidstentinginpatientswithasymptomaticcarotidarterystenosis |