Cargando…
Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentenc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045 |
_version_ | 1782207853042335744 |
---|---|
author | Hald, Lea A. Marshall, Julie-Ann Janssen, Dirk P. Garnham, Alan |
author_facet | Hald, Lea A. Marshall, Julie-Ann Janssen, Dirk P. Garnham, Alan |
author_sort | Hald, Lea A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentence describing a second fact grounded in a different modality. For example, “A cellar is dark” (visual), was preceded by either another visual property “Ham is pink” or by a tactile property “A mitten is soft.” We also investigated whether the modality switch effect occurs for false sentences (“A cellar is light”). We found that, for true sentences, the ERP at the critical word “dark” elicited a significantly greater frontal, early N400-like effect (270–370 ms) when there was a modality mismatch than when there was a modality-match. This pattern was not found for the critical word “light” in false sentences. Results similar to the frontal negativity were obtained in a late time window (500–700 ms). The obtained ERP effect is similar to one previously obtained for pictures. We conclude that in this paradigm we obtained fast access to conceptual properties for modality-matched pairs, which leads to embodiment effects similar to those previously obtained with pictorial stimuli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3132671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31326712011-07-21 Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing Hald, Lea A. Marshall, Julie-Ann Janssen, Dirk P. Garnham, Alan Front Psychol Psychology In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentence describing a second fact grounded in a different modality. For example, “A cellar is dark” (visual), was preceded by either another visual property “Ham is pink” or by a tactile property “A mitten is soft.” We also investigated whether the modality switch effect occurs for false sentences (“A cellar is light”). We found that, for true sentences, the ERP at the critical word “dark” elicited a significantly greater frontal, early N400-like effect (270–370 ms) when there was a modality mismatch than when there was a modality-match. This pattern was not found for the critical word “light” in false sentences. Results similar to the frontal negativity were obtained in a late time window (500–700 ms). The obtained ERP effect is similar to one previously obtained for pictures. We conclude that in this paradigm we obtained fast access to conceptual properties for modality-matched pairs, which leads to embodiment effects similar to those previously obtained with pictorial stimuli. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3132671/ /pubmed/21779254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hald, Marshall, Janssen and Garnham. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hald, Lea A. Marshall, Julie-Ann Janssen, Dirk P. Garnham, Alan Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing |
title | Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing |
title_full | Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing |
title_fullStr | Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing |
title_short | Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing |
title_sort | switching modalities in a sentence verification task: erp evidence for embodied language processing |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haldleaa switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing AT marshalljulieann switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing AT janssendirkp switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing AT garnhamalan switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing |