Cargando…

Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing

In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hald, Lea A., Marshall, Julie-Ann, Janssen, Dirk P., Garnham, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045
_version_ 1782207853042335744
author Hald, Lea A.
Marshall, Julie-Ann
Janssen, Dirk P.
Garnham, Alan
author_facet Hald, Lea A.
Marshall, Julie-Ann
Janssen, Dirk P.
Garnham, Alan
author_sort Hald, Lea A.
collection PubMed
description In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentence describing a second fact grounded in a different modality. For example, “A cellar is dark” (visual), was preceded by either another visual property “Ham is pink” or by a tactile property “A mitten is soft.” We also investigated whether the modality switch effect occurs for false sentences (“A cellar is light”). We found that, for true sentences, the ERP at the critical word “dark” elicited a significantly greater frontal, early N400-like effect (270–370 ms) when there was a modality mismatch than when there was a modality-match. This pattern was not found for the critical word “light” in false sentences. Results similar to the frontal negativity were obtained in a late time window (500–700 ms). The obtained ERP effect is similar to one previously obtained for pictures. We conclude that in this paradigm we obtained fast access to conceptual properties for modality-matched pairs, which leads to embodiment effects similar to those previously obtained with pictorial stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3132671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31326712011-07-21 Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing Hald, Lea A. Marshall, Julie-Ann Janssen, Dirk P. Garnham, Alan Front Psychol Psychology In an event related potential (ERP) experiment using written language materials only, we investigated a potential modulation of the N400 by the modality switch effect. The modality switch effect occurs when a first sentence, describing a fact grounded in one modality, is followed by a second sentence describing a second fact grounded in a different modality. For example, “A cellar is dark” (visual), was preceded by either another visual property “Ham is pink” or by a tactile property “A mitten is soft.” We also investigated whether the modality switch effect occurs for false sentences (“A cellar is light”). We found that, for true sentences, the ERP at the critical word “dark” elicited a significantly greater frontal, early N400-like effect (270–370 ms) when there was a modality mismatch than when there was a modality-match. This pattern was not found for the critical word “light” in false sentences. Results similar to the frontal negativity were obtained in a late time window (500–700 ms). The obtained ERP effect is similar to one previously obtained for pictures. We conclude that in this paradigm we obtained fast access to conceptual properties for modality-matched pairs, which leads to embodiment effects similar to those previously obtained with pictorial stimuli. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3132671/ /pubmed/21779254 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hald, Marshall, Janssen and Garnham. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hald, Lea A.
Marshall, Julie-Ann
Janssen, Dirk P.
Garnham, Alan
Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
title Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
title_full Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
title_fullStr Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
title_full_unstemmed Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
title_short Switching Modalities in A Sentence Verification Task: ERP Evidence for Embodied Language Processing
title_sort switching modalities in a sentence verification task: erp evidence for embodied language processing
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779254
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045
work_keys_str_mv AT haldleaa switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing
AT marshalljulieann switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing
AT janssendirkp switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing
AT garnhamalan switchingmodalitiesinasentenceverificationtaskerpevidenceforembodiedlanguageprocessing