Cargando…

Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use

Viral resistance to small molecule allosteric inhibitors of CCR5 is well documented, and involves either selection of preexisting CXCR4-using HIV-1 variants or envelope sequence evolution to use inhibitor-bound CCR5 for entry. Resistance to macromolecular CCR5 inhibitors has been more difficult to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nedellec, Rebecca, Coetzer, Mia, Lederman, Michael M., Offord, Robin E., Hartley, Oliver, Mosier, Donald E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022020
_version_ 1782207873034485760
author Nedellec, Rebecca
Coetzer, Mia
Lederman, Michael M.
Offord, Robin E.
Hartley, Oliver
Mosier, Donald E.
author_facet Nedellec, Rebecca
Coetzer, Mia
Lederman, Michael M.
Offord, Robin E.
Hartley, Oliver
Mosier, Donald E.
author_sort Nedellec, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Viral resistance to small molecule allosteric inhibitors of CCR5 is well documented, and involves either selection of preexisting CXCR4-using HIV-1 variants or envelope sequence evolution to use inhibitor-bound CCR5 for entry. Resistance to macromolecular CCR5 inhibitors has been more difficult to demonstrate, although selection of CXCR4-using variants might be expected. We have compared the in vitro selection of HIV-1 CC1/85 variants resistant to either the small molecule inhibitor maraviroc (MVC) or the macromolecular inhibitor 5P12-RANTES. High level resistance to MVC was conferred by the same envelope mutations as previously reported after 16–18 weeks of selection by increasing levels of MVC. The MVC-resistant mutants were fully sensitive to inhibition by 5P12-RANTES. By contrast, only transient and low level resistance to 5P12-RANTES was achieved in three sequential selection experiments, and each resulted in a subsequent collapse of virus replication. A fourth round of selection by 5P12-RANTES led, after 36 weeks, to a “resistant” variant that had switched from CCR5 to CXCR4 as a coreceptor. Envelope sequences diverged by 3.8% during selection of the 5P12-RANTES resistant, CXCR4-using variants, with unique and critical substitutions in the V3 region. A subset of viruses recovered from control cultures after 44 weeks of passage in the absence of inhibitors also evolved to use CXCR4, although with fewer and different envelope mutations. Control cultures contained both viruses that evolved to use CXCR4 by deleting four amino acids in V3, and others that maintained entry via CCR5. These results suggest that coreceptor switching may be the only route to resistance for compounds like 5P12-RANTES. This pathway requires more mutations and encounters more fitness obstacles than development of resistance to MVC, confirming the clinical observations that resistance to small molecule CCR5 inhibitors very rarely involves coreceptor switching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3132774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31327742011-07-14 Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use Nedellec, Rebecca Coetzer, Mia Lederman, Michael M. Offord, Robin E. Hartley, Oliver Mosier, Donald E. PLoS One Research Article Viral resistance to small molecule allosteric inhibitors of CCR5 is well documented, and involves either selection of preexisting CXCR4-using HIV-1 variants or envelope sequence evolution to use inhibitor-bound CCR5 for entry. Resistance to macromolecular CCR5 inhibitors has been more difficult to demonstrate, although selection of CXCR4-using variants might be expected. We have compared the in vitro selection of HIV-1 CC1/85 variants resistant to either the small molecule inhibitor maraviroc (MVC) or the macromolecular inhibitor 5P12-RANTES. High level resistance to MVC was conferred by the same envelope mutations as previously reported after 16–18 weeks of selection by increasing levels of MVC. The MVC-resistant mutants were fully sensitive to inhibition by 5P12-RANTES. By contrast, only transient and low level resistance to 5P12-RANTES was achieved in three sequential selection experiments, and each resulted in a subsequent collapse of virus replication. A fourth round of selection by 5P12-RANTES led, after 36 weeks, to a “resistant” variant that had switched from CCR5 to CXCR4 as a coreceptor. Envelope sequences diverged by 3.8% during selection of the 5P12-RANTES resistant, CXCR4-using variants, with unique and critical substitutions in the V3 region. A subset of viruses recovered from control cultures after 44 weeks of passage in the absence of inhibitors also evolved to use CXCR4, although with fewer and different envelope mutations. Control cultures contained both viruses that evolved to use CXCR4 by deleting four amino acids in V3, and others that maintained entry via CCR5. These results suggest that coreceptor switching may be the only route to resistance for compounds like 5P12-RANTES. This pathway requires more mutations and encounters more fitness obstacles than development of resistance to MVC, confirming the clinical observations that resistance to small molecule CCR5 inhibitors very rarely involves coreceptor switching. Public Library of Science 2011-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3132774/ /pubmed/21760945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022020 Text en Nedellec et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nedellec, Rebecca
Coetzer, Mia
Lederman, Michael M.
Offord, Robin E.
Hartley, Oliver
Mosier, Donald E.
Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use
title Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use
title_full Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use
title_fullStr Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use
title_full_unstemmed Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use
title_short Resistance to the CCR5 Inhibitor 5P12-RANTES Requires a Difficult Evolution from CCR5 to CXCR4 Coreceptor Use
title_sort resistance to the ccr5 inhibitor 5p12-rantes requires a difficult evolution from ccr5 to cxcr4 coreceptor use
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3132774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022020
work_keys_str_mv AT nedellecrebecca resistancetotheccr5inhibitor5p12rantesrequiresadifficultevolutionfromccr5tocxcr4coreceptoruse
AT coetzermia resistancetotheccr5inhibitor5p12rantesrequiresadifficultevolutionfromccr5tocxcr4coreceptoruse
AT ledermanmichaelm resistancetotheccr5inhibitor5p12rantesrequiresadifficultevolutionfromccr5tocxcr4coreceptoruse
AT offordrobine resistancetotheccr5inhibitor5p12rantesrequiresadifficultevolutionfromccr5tocxcr4coreceptoruse
AT hartleyoliver resistancetotheccr5inhibitor5p12rantesrequiresadifficultevolutionfromccr5tocxcr4coreceptoruse
AT mosierdonalde resistancetotheccr5inhibitor5p12rantesrequiresadifficultevolutionfromccr5tocxcr4coreceptoruse