Cargando…

Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter

AIM: To compare the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P noncontact specular microscope (NCSM) and the DGH 500 ultrasound pachymeter (USP). METHODS: Triplicate measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) for 100 eyes were taken with an NCSM and a USP in 2 visits separated by 1 week. Repeatability wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almubrad, Turki M, Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L, AlAbbadi, Ibrahim, Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760714
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S21247
_version_ 1782207894116106240
author Almubrad, Turki M
Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L
AlAbbadi, Ibrahim
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
author_facet Almubrad, Turki M
Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L
AlAbbadi, Ibrahim
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
author_sort Almubrad, Turki M
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P noncontact specular microscope (NCSM) and the DGH 500 ultrasound pachymeter (USP). METHODS: Triplicate measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) for 100 eyes were taken with an NCSM and a USP in 2 visits separated by 1 week. Repeatability was assessed by computing the differences between all 3 readings from each subject. Coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were computed. RESULTS: Mean CCT as measured by each instrument were: 518.53 ± 34.96 μm (range 417.33–592.67) and 516.94 ± 33.60 μm (range 431.67–582.67) for sessions 1 and 2 respectively, with the NCSM; 546.69 ± 36.62 μm (range 457.33–617.00) and 549.78 ± 35.26 μm (range 454.00–618.67) for sessions 1 and 2 respectively, with the USP. The ultrasound CCT measurements were consistently higher than those obtained with the NCSM in both sessions 28.17 ± 19.20 μm (mean ± SD, session 1) and 32.81 ± 14.04 (mean ± SD, session 2). The repeatability coefficient for the NCSM was better in both sessions than those for USP (±10 μm vs ± 12 μm in session 1 and ±8 μm vs ±10 μm in session 2). The reproducibility coefficient with the NCSM was half that with the USP (±21 μm vs ±41 μm). CONCLUSION: The SP-3000P NCSM is a more precise and reproducible instrument for measurement of CCT than the USP, but both instruments are reliable, useful instruments for measuring CCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3133003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31330032011-07-14 Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter Almubrad, Turki M Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L AlAbbadi, Ibrahim Ogbuehi, Kelechi C Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIM: To compare the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P noncontact specular microscope (NCSM) and the DGH 500 ultrasound pachymeter (USP). METHODS: Triplicate measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) for 100 eyes were taken with an NCSM and a USP in 2 visits separated by 1 week. Repeatability was assessed by computing the differences between all 3 readings from each subject. Coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were computed. RESULTS: Mean CCT as measured by each instrument were: 518.53 ± 34.96 μm (range 417.33–592.67) and 516.94 ± 33.60 μm (range 431.67–582.67) for sessions 1 and 2 respectively, with the NCSM; 546.69 ± 36.62 μm (range 457.33–617.00) and 549.78 ± 35.26 μm (range 454.00–618.67) for sessions 1 and 2 respectively, with the USP. The ultrasound CCT measurements were consistently higher than those obtained with the NCSM in both sessions 28.17 ± 19.20 μm (mean ± SD, session 1) and 32.81 ± 14.04 (mean ± SD, session 2). The repeatability coefficient for the NCSM was better in both sessions than those for USP (±10 μm vs ± 12 μm in session 1 and ±8 μm vs ±10 μm in session 2). The reproducibility coefficient with the NCSM was half that with the USP (±21 μm vs ±41 μm). CONCLUSION: The SP-3000P NCSM is a more precise and reproducible instrument for measurement of CCT than the USP, but both instruments are reliable, useful instruments for measuring CCT. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3133003/ /pubmed/21760714 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S21247 Text en © 2011 Almubrad et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Almubrad, Turki M
Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L
AlAbbadi, Ibrahim
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C
Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
title Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
title_full Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
title_fullStr Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
title_short Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
title_sort comparison of the precision of the topcon sp-3000p specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760714
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S21247
work_keys_str_mv AT almubradturkim comparisonoftheprecisionofthetopconsp3000pspecularmicroscopeandanultrasoundpachymeter
AT osuagwuuchechukwul comparisonoftheprecisionofthetopconsp3000pspecularmicroscopeandanultrasoundpachymeter
AT alabbadiibrahim comparisonoftheprecisionofthetopconsp3000pspecularmicroscopeandanultrasoundpachymeter
AT ogbuehikelechic comparisonoftheprecisionofthetopconsp3000pspecularmicroscopeandanultrasoundpachymeter