Cargando…

Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice

BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a worldwide public health concern. It is also a major source of disability that is often overlooked, depriving patients of effective treatments. This study describes the development and validation of a questionnaire specifically assessing C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguilaniu, B, Gonzalez-Bermejo, J, Regnault, A, Barbosa, C Dias, Arnould, B, Mueser, M, Granet, G, Bonnefoy, M, Similowski, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760726
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S20007
_version_ 1782207904400539648
author Aguilaniu, B
Gonzalez-Bermejo, J
Regnault, A
Barbosa, C Dias
Arnould, B
Mueser, M
Granet, G
Bonnefoy, M
Similowski, T
author_facet Aguilaniu, B
Gonzalez-Bermejo, J
Regnault, A
Barbosa, C Dias
Arnould, B
Mueser, M
Granet, G
Bonnefoy, M
Similowski, T
author_sort Aguilaniu, B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a worldwide public health concern. It is also a major source of disability that is often overlooked, depriving patients of effective treatments. This study describes the development and validation of a questionnaire specifically assessing COPD-related disability. METHODS: The DIsability RElated to COPD Tool (DIRECT) was developed according to reference methods, including literature review, patient and clinician interviews and test in a pilot study. A 12-item questionnaire was included for finalization and validation in an observational cross-sectional study conducted by 60 French pulmonologists, who recruited 275 COPD patients of stage II, III and IV according to the GOLD classification. Rasch modeling was conducted and psychometric properties were assessed (internal consistency reliability; concurrent and clinical validity). RESULTS: The DIRECT score was built from the 10 items retained in the Rasch model. Their internal consistency reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95). The score was highly correlated with the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Activity score (r = 0.83) and the London Handicap Scale (r = −0.70), a generic disability measure. It was highly statistically significantly associated to four clinical parameters (P < 0.001): GOLD classification, BODE index, FEV(1) and 6-minute walk distance. CONCLUSION: DIRECT is a promising tool that could help enhance the management of COPD patients by integrating an evaluation of the COPD-related disability into daily practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3133511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31335112011-07-14 Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice Aguilaniu, B Gonzalez-Bermejo, J Regnault, A Barbosa, C Dias Arnould, B Mueser, M Granet, G Bonnefoy, M Similowski, T Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a worldwide public health concern. It is also a major source of disability that is often overlooked, depriving patients of effective treatments. This study describes the development and validation of a questionnaire specifically assessing COPD-related disability. METHODS: The DIsability RElated to COPD Tool (DIRECT) was developed according to reference methods, including literature review, patient and clinician interviews and test in a pilot study. A 12-item questionnaire was included for finalization and validation in an observational cross-sectional study conducted by 60 French pulmonologists, who recruited 275 COPD patients of stage II, III and IV according to the GOLD classification. Rasch modeling was conducted and psychometric properties were assessed (internal consistency reliability; concurrent and clinical validity). RESULTS: The DIRECT score was built from the 10 items retained in the Rasch model. Their internal consistency reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95). The score was highly correlated with the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Activity score (r = 0.83) and the London Handicap Scale (r = −0.70), a generic disability measure. It was highly statistically significantly associated to four clinical parameters (P < 0.001): GOLD classification, BODE index, FEV(1) and 6-minute walk distance. CONCLUSION: DIRECT is a promising tool that could help enhance the management of COPD patients by integrating an evaluation of the COPD-related disability into daily practice. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3133511/ /pubmed/21760726 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S20007 Text en © 2011 Aguilaniu et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Aguilaniu, B
Gonzalez-Bermejo, J
Regnault, A
Barbosa, C Dias
Arnould, B
Mueser, M
Granet, G
Bonnefoy, M
Similowski, T
Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice
title Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice
title_full Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice
title_fullStr Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice
title_full_unstemmed Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice
title_short Disability related to COPD tool (DIRECT): towards an assessment of COPD-related disability in routine practice
title_sort disability related to copd tool (direct): towards an assessment of copd-related disability in routine practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760726
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S20007
work_keys_str_mv AT aguilaniub disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT gonzalezbermejoj disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT regnaulta disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT barbosacdias disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT arnouldb disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT mueserm disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT granetg disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT bonnefoym disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice
AT similowskit disabilityrelatedtocopdtooldirecttowardsanassessmentofcopdrelateddisabilityinroutinepractice