Cargando…

Spatial dependency of action simulation

In this study, we investigated the spatial dependency of action simulation. From previous research in the field of single-cell recordings, grasping studies and from crossmodal extinction tasks, it is known that our surrounding space can be divided into a peripersonal space and extrapersonal space. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ter Horst, Arjan C., van Lier, Rob, Steenbergen, Bert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21706301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2748-2
_version_ 1782207919447605248
author ter Horst, Arjan C.
van Lier, Rob
Steenbergen, Bert
author_facet ter Horst, Arjan C.
van Lier, Rob
Steenbergen, Bert
author_sort ter Horst, Arjan C.
collection PubMed
description In this study, we investigated the spatial dependency of action simulation. From previous research in the field of single-cell recordings, grasping studies and from crossmodal extinction tasks, it is known that our surrounding space can be divided into a peripersonal space and extrapersonal space. These two spaces are functionally different at both the behavioral and neuronal level. The peripersonal space can be seen as an action space which is limited to the area in which we can grasp objects without moving the object or ourselves. The extrapersonal space is the space beyond the peripersonal space. Objects situated within peripersonal space are mapped onto an egocentric reference frame. This mapping is thought to be accomplished by action simulation. To provide direct evidence of the embodied nature of this simulated motor act, we performed two experiments, in which we used two mental rotation tasks, one with stimuli of hands and one with stimuli of graspable objects. Stimuli were presented in both peri- and extrapersonal space. The results showed increased reaction times for biomechanically difficult to adopt postures compared to more easy to adopt postures for both hand and graspable object stimuli. Importantly, this difference was only present for stimuli presented in peripersonal space but not for the stimuli presented in extrapersonal space. These results extend previous behavioral findings on the functional distinction between peripersonal- and extrapersonal space by providing direct evidence for the spatial dependency of the use of action simulation. Furthermore, these results strengthen the hypothesis that objects situated within the peripersonal space are mapped onto an egocentric reference frame by action simulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3133649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31336492011-08-11 Spatial dependency of action simulation ter Horst, Arjan C. van Lier, Rob Steenbergen, Bert Exp Brain Res Research Article In this study, we investigated the spatial dependency of action simulation. From previous research in the field of single-cell recordings, grasping studies and from crossmodal extinction tasks, it is known that our surrounding space can be divided into a peripersonal space and extrapersonal space. These two spaces are functionally different at both the behavioral and neuronal level. The peripersonal space can be seen as an action space which is limited to the area in which we can grasp objects without moving the object or ourselves. The extrapersonal space is the space beyond the peripersonal space. Objects situated within peripersonal space are mapped onto an egocentric reference frame. This mapping is thought to be accomplished by action simulation. To provide direct evidence of the embodied nature of this simulated motor act, we performed two experiments, in which we used two mental rotation tasks, one with stimuli of hands and one with stimuli of graspable objects. Stimuli were presented in both peri- and extrapersonal space. The results showed increased reaction times for biomechanically difficult to adopt postures compared to more easy to adopt postures for both hand and graspable object stimuli. Importantly, this difference was only present for stimuli presented in peripersonal space but not for the stimuli presented in extrapersonal space. These results extend previous behavioral findings on the functional distinction between peripersonal- and extrapersonal space by providing direct evidence for the spatial dependency of the use of action simulation. Furthermore, these results strengthen the hypothesis that objects situated within the peripersonal space are mapped onto an egocentric reference frame by action simulation. Springer-Verlag 2011-06-26 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3133649/ /pubmed/21706301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2748-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
ter Horst, Arjan C.
van Lier, Rob
Steenbergen, Bert
Spatial dependency of action simulation
title Spatial dependency of action simulation
title_full Spatial dependency of action simulation
title_fullStr Spatial dependency of action simulation
title_full_unstemmed Spatial dependency of action simulation
title_short Spatial dependency of action simulation
title_sort spatial dependency of action simulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21706301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2748-2
work_keys_str_mv AT terhorstarjanc spatialdependencyofactionsimulation
AT vanlierrob spatialdependencyofactionsimulation
AT steenbergenbert spatialdependencyofactionsimulation