Cargando…

Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Dissatisfaction with uniprofessional education structures as a means of improving the quality of healthcare has led to proposals to develop ways of integrating professional learning and organisational development. AIMS: Test the feasibility of introducing practice and professional develo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elwyn, Glyn, Carlisle, Sandra, Hocking, Paul, Smail, Simon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11299046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-2-1
_version_ 1782119977236561920
author Elwyn, Glyn
Carlisle, Sandra
Hocking, Paul
Smail, Simon
author_facet Elwyn, Glyn
Carlisle, Sandra
Hocking, Paul
Smail, Simon
author_sort Elwyn, Glyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dissatisfaction with uniprofessional education structures as a means of improving the quality of healthcare has led to proposals to develop ways of integrating professional learning and organisational development. AIMS: Test the feasibility of introducing practice and professional development plans using a centrally sponsored project in Wales. DESIGN: Qualitative observational study. STUDY SAMPLE: All 541 practices in Wales were alerted to the project and invited to apply. A selection process was suggested to Health Authorities but not always efficiently conducted: 23 practices were selected and 18 participated in the process. METHOD: Central funding was made available to health authorities. The project framework was designed by an educational department and conceptualised as the development of personal portfolios linked to one key organisation change in each practice, facilitated by external consultants who would typically hold workshops or other events. An independent researcher using non-participant observation techniques at workshops and practices undertook documentary analysis and fieldwork in four health authorities. RESULTS: Difficulties were encountered with the process of implementing the project: marketing and practice selection inconsistencies delayed the work and it was difficult to recruit practices into the project. The lack of experienced individuals to do the work and practitioner suspicion about perceived 'management' agendas were significant problems. After initial hesitancies most practices appreciated the value of developing wider ownership and commitment to proposed practice changes. Organisations found it difficult to support individual completion of the personal portfolio component of the plans. The ability to develop systems for clinical services was dependent on having already established a culture of effective teamwork in the organisation. CONCLUSIONS: This work supports the view that organisational development has considerable potential for bringing about effective change, and individual contributions could form a valuable component of personal portfolios. We believe that the existing structures in education and management in the health service are not yet able to support these processes. Evidence from the fields of risk management and quality improvement all point to the need to develop effective organisational systems and the results of this feasibility study indicate that alternative models of sustaining organisational development need careful evaluation.
format Text
id pubmed-31343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-313432001-05-14 Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study Elwyn, Glyn Carlisle, Sandra Hocking, Paul Smail, Simon BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Dissatisfaction with uniprofessional education structures as a means of improving the quality of healthcare has led to proposals to develop ways of integrating professional learning and organisational development. AIMS: Test the feasibility of introducing practice and professional development plans using a centrally sponsored project in Wales. DESIGN: Qualitative observational study. STUDY SAMPLE: All 541 practices in Wales were alerted to the project and invited to apply. A selection process was suggested to Health Authorities but not always efficiently conducted: 23 practices were selected and 18 participated in the process. METHOD: Central funding was made available to health authorities. The project framework was designed by an educational department and conceptualised as the development of personal portfolios linked to one key organisation change in each practice, facilitated by external consultants who would typically hold workshops or other events. An independent researcher using non-participant observation techniques at workshops and practices undertook documentary analysis and fieldwork in four health authorities. RESULTS: Difficulties were encountered with the process of implementing the project: marketing and practice selection inconsistencies delayed the work and it was difficult to recruit practices into the project. The lack of experienced individuals to do the work and practitioner suspicion about perceived 'management' agendas were significant problems. After initial hesitancies most practices appreciated the value of developing wider ownership and commitment to proposed practice changes. Organisations found it difficult to support individual completion of the personal portfolio component of the plans. The ability to develop systems for clinical services was dependent on having already established a culture of effective teamwork in the organisation. CONCLUSIONS: This work supports the view that organisational development has considerable potential for bringing about effective change, and individual contributions could form a valuable component of personal portfolios. We believe that the existing structures in education and management in the health service are not yet able to support these processes. Evidence from the fields of risk management and quality improvement all point to the need to develop effective organisational systems and the results of this feasibility study indicate that alternative models of sustaining organisational development need careful evaluation. BioMed Central 2001-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC31343/ /pubmed/11299046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-2-1 Text en Copyright © 2001 Elwyn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elwyn, Glyn
Carlisle, Sandra
Hocking, Paul
Smail, Simon
Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study
title Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study
title_full Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study
title_fullStr Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study
title_short Practice and professional development plans (PPDPs): results of a feasibility study
title_sort practice and professional development plans (ppdps): results of a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11299046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-2-1
work_keys_str_mv AT elwynglyn practiceandprofessionaldevelopmentplansppdpsresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT carlislesandra practiceandprofessionaldevelopmentplansppdpsresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT hockingpaul practiceandprofessionaldevelopmentplansppdpsresultsofafeasibilitystudy
AT smailsimon practiceandprofessionaldevelopmentplansppdpsresultsofafeasibilitystudy