Cargando…

Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery

INTRODUCTION: During the past five years, ridged sternal fixation has been utilized for sternal closure after cardiac surgery. It is known that this procedure provides better sternal stability; however, its contribution to patient recovery has not been investigated. METHODS: Retrospective chart revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirose, Hitoshi, Yamane, Kentaro, Youdelman, Benjamin A, Bogar, Linda, Diehl, James T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3134981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760857
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401105010148
_version_ 1782208040257191936
author Hirose, Hitoshi
Yamane, Kentaro
Youdelman, Benjamin A
Bogar, Linda
Diehl, James T
author_facet Hirose, Hitoshi
Yamane, Kentaro
Youdelman, Benjamin A
Bogar, Linda
Diehl, James T
author_sort Hirose, Hitoshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: During the past five years, ridged sternal fixation has been utilized for sternal closure after cardiac surgery. It is known that this procedure provides better sternal stability; however, its contribution to patient recovery has not been investigated. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent CABG and/or valve surgery in our institution between 2009 and 2010. Preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data of patients with ridgid fixation (group R, n=89) were collected and compared with those patients with conventional sternal closure (group C, n=133). The decision regarding the sternal closure method was based on the surgeon’s preferences. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the dominant factor of sternal lock usage and to evaluate postoperative recoveries. The factors included in the analyses were; age, sex, coronary risk factors, urgency of surgery, ejection fraction, coronary anatomy, preoperative stroke, renal function, and preoperative presence of heart failure. All statistical analyses were performed by JMP software. RESULTS: Group R was younger (62 ± 9 in group R vs 69 ± 11 in group C, p<0.0001) than group C, more male dominant (61% vs 49%, p=0.0452), had a lower percentage of patients undergoing redo-surgery (2.2% vs 9.0%, p<0.0418), was more likely to be used in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (71% vs 46%, p=0.0002), more often to be used for large patient (body mass index, BMI greater than 30) (58% vs 37%. P=0.0045), and patients were more likely to have a low EuroSCORE (2.6 ± 2.3 vs 4.4 ± 2.7). Intubation time (13 ± 20 hours vs 39 ± 97 hours, p=0.0030), ICU stay (58 ± 40 hours vs 99 ± 119 hours, p=0.0003), and postoperative length of stay (7.0 ± 3.7 days vs 8.4 ± 4.7 days, p<0.0141) were significantly shorter in group R than group C. Multivariate analyses showed ridged sternal fixation was the most dominant factor affecting intubation time and ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Rigid sternal fixation systems were more frequently applied to low risk young male patients. Among these selected patients, ridgid sternal fixation can contribute to early patient recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3134981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31349812011-07-14 Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery Hirose, Hitoshi Yamane, Kentaro Youdelman, Benjamin A Bogar, Linda Diehl, James T Open Cardiovasc Med J Article INTRODUCTION: During the past five years, ridged sternal fixation has been utilized for sternal closure after cardiac surgery. It is known that this procedure provides better sternal stability; however, its contribution to patient recovery has not been investigated. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent CABG and/or valve surgery in our institution between 2009 and 2010. Preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data of patients with ridgid fixation (group R, n=89) were collected and compared with those patients with conventional sternal closure (group C, n=133). The decision regarding the sternal closure method was based on the surgeon’s preferences. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the dominant factor of sternal lock usage and to evaluate postoperative recoveries. The factors included in the analyses were; age, sex, coronary risk factors, urgency of surgery, ejection fraction, coronary anatomy, preoperative stroke, renal function, and preoperative presence of heart failure. All statistical analyses were performed by JMP software. RESULTS: Group R was younger (62 ± 9 in group R vs 69 ± 11 in group C, p<0.0001) than group C, more male dominant (61% vs 49%, p=0.0452), had a lower percentage of patients undergoing redo-surgery (2.2% vs 9.0%, p<0.0418), was more likely to be used in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (71% vs 46%, p=0.0002), more often to be used for large patient (body mass index, BMI greater than 30) (58% vs 37%. P=0.0045), and patients were more likely to have a low EuroSCORE (2.6 ± 2.3 vs 4.4 ± 2.7). Intubation time (13 ± 20 hours vs 39 ± 97 hours, p=0.0030), ICU stay (58 ± 40 hours vs 99 ± 119 hours, p=0.0003), and postoperative length of stay (7.0 ± 3.7 days vs 8.4 ± 4.7 days, p<0.0141) were significantly shorter in group R than group C. Multivariate analyses showed ridged sternal fixation was the most dominant factor affecting intubation time and ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Rigid sternal fixation systems were more frequently applied to low risk young male patients. Among these selected patients, ridgid sternal fixation can contribute to early patient recovery. Bentham Open 2011-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3134981/ /pubmed/21760857 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401105010148 Text en © Hirose et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Hirose, Hitoshi
Yamane, Kentaro
Youdelman, Benjamin A
Bogar, Linda
Diehl, James T
Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery
title Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery
title_full Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery
title_fullStr Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery
title_short Rigid Sternal Fixation Improves Postoperative Recovery
title_sort rigid sternal fixation improves postoperative recovery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3134981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21760857
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401105010148
work_keys_str_mv AT hirosehitoshi rigidsternalfixationimprovespostoperativerecovery
AT yamanekentaro rigidsternalfixationimprovespostoperativerecovery
AT youdelmanbenjamina rigidsternalfixationimprovespostoperativerecovery
AT bogarlinda rigidsternalfixationimprovespostoperativerecovery
AT diehljamest rigidsternalfixationimprovespostoperativerecovery